- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Kent on Piers Morgan
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:52 am to ChatGPT of LA
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:52 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
So to be clear, you dont think he has people in certain positions that he could speak with at any time?
I can’t read my post for you. I agreed with you and asked a question which you ignored.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:54 am to the808bass
Yeah, and its trying to be explained to you that it doesnt matter what I know has been found......its that he knows more than any of us normal citizens.
How is this hard for you to absorb
How is this hard for you to absorb
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:58 am to ChatGPT of LA
These things seem to hit a little close to home for the usually affable 808bass.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:05 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
that he knows more than any of us normal citizens.
Yes. And if there’s nothing to know from a terrorism perspective, he knows the same as you and I do.
You’re assuming that he knows more because you assume there’s more there from an intelligence perspective. He doesn’t refer to that at all in his interview.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:05 pm to SirWinston
Intellectual rigor isn’t your thing.
Tell us about Joe’s jawline.
Tell us about Joe’s jawline.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
And if there’s nothing to know from a terrorism perspective
You have no fricking clue
quote:
And if
Oh boy
quote:
you assume there’s more there from an intelligence
No I dont
quote:
He doesn’t refer to that at all in his interview.
Didn't say he did
See, youre basically arguing with yourself...and losing. Its made up in your head.
I stand by saying as a government official, he had access to information that you dont, and never will. Direct access? Maybe, maybe not. But talking to others in government that have way more knowledge of the information....ABSOLUTELY
you moron
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:13 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
You have no fricking clue
So you and I are in the same boat vis a vis intelligence finds in re: Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
quote:
No I dont
Then you’re retarded. There’s no reason for you to be in this thread if you don’t assume there’s intelligence linking this beyond Tyler Robinson.
quote:
I stand by saying as a government official, he had access to information that you dont, and never will.
None of that contradicts anything I’ve posted. Now who’s arguing with themselves?
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:16 pm to the808bass
You should carry the information I've awarded you, and go back and read my original post that you jumped on...
And if you can't see how fricking dumb you are...then I understand. Its super hard to self diagnose stupidity
And if you can't see how fricking dumb you are...then I understand. Its super hard to self diagnose stupidity
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
As far as the case against Tyler Robinson goes, I can’t speak to him. It sounds to me like they have enough evidence to convict him.
No shite Kent. This is what kills all the conspiracy theories.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:21 pm to theballguy
quote:
I'd much rather Israel and the US take over the world than Muzzies.
"Israel and the US"
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:23 pm to the808bass
That guy is full of crap.....he resigned to make $$$ on interviews, period.
He makes no sense about how, when, why, and where....
He makes no sense about how, when, why, and where....
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:27 pm to ChatGPT of LA
You don’t have an argument with anything that I’ve actually said.
You’re arguing with something you want me to say.
I can’t help that kind of idiot.
You’re arguing with something you want me to say.
I can’t help that kind of idiot.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:46 pm to oldskule
quote:
That guy is full of crap.....he resigned to make $$$ on interviews, period. He makes no sense about how, when, why, and where....
Yep. He’s like those morons screeching about there being no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after we invaded, wrecked the place for 8 years, hung the toadie we had installed decades earlier and buried 4800 servicemen.
Oh, wait…
Posted on 3/28/26 at 1:54 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
It seems to me like the guy just wants the crime to be fully investigated, rather than .Gov jumping to a sole conclusion and demonizing anyone disagrees with that sole conclusion at this stage.
Here's why I disagree: Federal law enforcement only investigates a situation like this initially up to the point that they can determine that it is a federal case. Once/if they decide it's not, they turn it over to state/local law enforcement.
In this case they had DNA, prints, video, and online communication. So they turned it over to local law enforcement, which would be pretty standard in a case like this. It's my understanding that doing so doesn't mean that the FBI can't be involved, but they have to be requested by the state/local LE. It's also my understanding that the authorities are investigating leads to determine who may have radicalized this kid.
As far as Joe Kent, I see a guy who is saying and implying just enough to keep the spotlight on himself, but keeping it vague so he can't be pinned down on anything.
Popular
Back to top


1





