re: Joe Biden Under Active Criminal Investigation for Spygate Actions

It's not hypocritical to believe in some sources and not others, baw.

quote:

---

It's not hypocritical to believe in some sources and not others, baw

---

Yes. We all already know you put your stock in shite tier sources. What with all the "muh Russia, muh Steele Dossier" and whatever other nonsense you've pushed on this board the last couple years.

quote:

---

It's not hypocritical to believe in some sources and not others, baw.

---

Even if the one second you believed in were proven 100 percent false? Perhaps you’re not a hypocrite, just gullible.

BoarEd

Welcome back.

Joe Biden will plead the 4th

quote:

---

BoarEd

Welcome back.

---

Thanks, man.

Good to be back in time for the shitshow to begin. I earned that last ban. Of all the times I've been banned, that was the first that was deserved.

OMG..... I can’t believe Trump is going after his political opponent!

quote:

---

Well, not everything can be as authoritative as Q drops.

---

Nicely done keeping the streak going of the Q-Haters Club being the first one to bring the topic up in the never ending quest for the ad hom sick burn.

That's hilarious.

It was a sincere question because somebody posted a tweet earlier saying Wray was stepping down, and I thought maybe it was this guy.

I think the post was in another thread. You should start ignoring me.

quote:

---

We're talking about grounds to believe anonymous sources and so if you believe an anonymous poster from an image board full of LARPer's who's claiming to be a super-spy and this leads you to draw the conclusions that the slaughter of all your political enemies will lead to a golden age of free energy, release of withheld cures for diseases, and peace and harmony on earth, I'd say that's relevant for one's claims to judge appropriate levels of skepticism.

---

Here's the deal with some of you guys. TigerDoc, you're an intelligent woman. Supposedly. And I know you follow along with the Q thread. Same with boosie and probably several other people who spend crazy inordinate amounts of time following something they supposedly don't believe at all. You, being an intelligent woman, should know that this post is ridiculous. You know damn well that things are unfolding as Q has said they would.

Same with boosie yesterday (and honestly boosie I apologize for using this as an example, its just that it's a great example). That dude is supposedly a lawyer and you are supposedly a doctor. Yet neither of you seems able to reason well enough to put together the truth even when it's staring you straight in the face.

You're supposedly learned people and you're both blind as Ray Charles. This tells me neither of you are who you claim you are. And I'm sure most people that read y'all's posts would agree with this assessment. I honestly can't understand why you guys would keep at it at this point.

Appropriate levels of skepticism?! Your entire persona here induces heavy amounts of skepticism.

But here's the thing with Q since we are talking sources... Q isn't a source. Q is just pointing an arrow down which avenues to research. The research is where the sources are found. And our sources told us, in real time, that what we were seeing was a soft coup attempt... That has proven true.

Bitch all you want. We got scoreboard on your arse.