- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Job numbers crush 195k vs 150k expected
Posted on 9/5/19 at 2:21 pm to Zanzibaw
Posted on 9/5/19 at 2:21 pm to Zanzibaw
quote:
I don't think this says what you think it says
July headline number was +156k
After further calculations it came in at +142k?
Yes it was lower for last month.
Not this month.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 2:22 pm to Lsujacket66
If things don’t change soon, and change drastically, this recession may not get off the ground.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 2:24 pm to Lsujacket66
Where I have lived the last 27 yrs yesterday was the first time I have seen three help wanted signs posted at once in store windows in my tiny town of 1500 pop.
The lumber mill also expanded and just opened a new glue-lam section. Now they can make giant glu-lam beams with very mall diameter lumber.
The lumber mill also expanded and just opened a new glue-lam section. Now they can make giant glu-lam beams with very mall diameter lumber.
This post was edited on 9/5/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:10 pm to Chief One Word
Hope they don't have to 'adjust" downward again by 500k
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:28 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Hope they don't have to 'adjust" downward again by 500k
Yes you do. Helps you progs if they have to adjust down. You can be honest.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:30 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
Job numbers crush 195k vs 150k expected
Muh Recession!
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:30 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:So remember to vote Democrat. Just way too many people employed. Welfare is good for the economy!!
Job numbers crush 195k vs 150k expected
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:30 pm to Lsujacket66
It’s good that it beat expectations. Below 200k is probably stagnant to mild decrease of labor participation rate.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:02 pm to Zanzibaw
And how do you think the other guy read it?
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:32 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
And how do you think the other guy read it?
While j’ing his p’s thinking that 14k jobs were lost.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 5:34 pm to Lsujacket66
Tough business selling a RECESSION in this runaway economy isn’t it
LMAO at Democrat Socialist Party
LMAO at Democrat Socialist Party
Posted on 9/5/19 at 6:22 pm to Zanzibaw
why would anyone read his post that way when he quoted the "revised down" part?
Posted on 9/5/19 at 9:23 pm to 90proofprofessional
Why would he respond “always”?
Posted on 9/6/19 at 5:30 am to Zanzibaw
You are saying that because he said "always", he thinks that a positive number being revised into a smaller positive number somehow means a negative number?
Or maybe you just perhaps mis-read him the first time, and responded too hastily?
Or maybe you just perhaps mis-read him the first time, and responded too hastily?
Posted on 9/6/19 at 7:29 am to Lsujacket66
oof, official jobs numbers from BLS are out.
they didn't crush.
they didn't crush.
Posted on 9/6/19 at 7:32 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
Or maybe you just perhaps mis-read him the first time, and responded too hastily?
Or maybe I responded to him and for some reason you took it upon yourself to white knight for him
Posted on 9/6/19 at 7:39 am to bmy
quote:
Always
Hey idiot, it's called the "Obama Method" .
Fortunately we don't do that as much anymore.
Now go back to Mommy's basement and continue to Cosplay with your fellow Anti-fig loser brethren...
Posted on 9/6/19 at 7:50 am to Zanzibaw
All I did was press you for an explanation for whatever you were suggesting but not explaining. Don't be mad at me just because we can now see that it was nonsensical.
Posted on 9/6/19 at 7:51 am to oogabooga68
quote:
Hey idiot, it's called the "Obama Method" .
Fortunately we don't do that as much anymore
:goosechuckle.gif:
Posted on 9/6/19 at 8:08 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
All I did was press you for an explanation for whatever you were suggesting but not explaining.
Which I explained. You on the other hand continue to blindly defend an interpretation of what he meant with no more explanation from the source than I have. At least my comment was directed to the source with for a chance to explain. You see that's the problem with people like you. You need so desperately to be the contrarian that you just challenge on semantics and verbiage and never truly make a point. It's okay to not be a complete dick 100% of the time. Why not cut it back to 80% and see how that feels for a little while.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News