- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin: No "Criminal Conviction" Needed To Bar Trump Via 14th Amendment
Posted on 11/17/23 at 9:44 am to BengalOnTheBay
Posted on 11/17/23 at 9:44 am to BengalOnTheBay
quote:
But nowhere does it say that you need to have a criminal conviction in order to make section three of the 14th Amendment apply.”
Typical leftist tactic. Attempt to redefine something then try passing it off as having always been the case and hope enough people swallow it.
Posted on 11/18/23 at 4:02 pm to Antoninus
God you are just too dumb for words. Insurrection is defined in the us code. It is a frickin law you dumbass. You cannot find that a person engaged in an insurrection outside of the codified statute. Period. End of Story.
Posted on 11/18/23 at 4:24 pm to BengalOnTheBay

Posted on 11/18/23 at 4:26 pm to Pecker
I’ve seen space aliens in the quad look more human than that.
Popular
Back to top


0




