- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jacksonville Police investigate themselves and, as per usual, find themselves not-guilty
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:25 pm to HagaDaga
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:25 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
Hi Dex...
"Have you noticed that you never see Grumpy and Dex in the same place at the same time?"
"That's silly. Grumpy wears glasses and is mild mannered. They can't be the same".
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:26 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Grumpy with another anti-police thread, like clockwork
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:28 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
Grumpy with another anti-police thread, like clockwork
Well. I love political talk but frankly, I find the current common subjects a shade boring. I'm certain that will change soon enough because it always does. But I just sort of feel like everything that can be said about Epstein has been. And I kind of feel like the whole Russia and Obama thing is so obvious that I would just be repeating what everybody else is saying
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:29 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Of all the topics you could discuss, this is again the one you chose to bring up.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:31 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
Of all the topics you could discuss, this is again the one you chose to bring up
Well frankly I bumped into the video and remembered the incident from when it was first published. It was kind of happenstance. Regardless don't worry. I am certain that at some point you will see me posting a hundred times in some other thread at least 20% longer than I should
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:38 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
Of all the topics you could discuss, this is again the one you chose to bring up.
Also keep in mind. I obviously could go to some liberal board and have a bunch of people blow smoke up my arse about how terrible police are and theoretically agree with my posts. But nobody is going to fix policing in this country until conservative start to see the problem also. So as a conservative myself who has argued multiple conservative viewpoints on this very board my words are far less wasted here than preaching to some idiot amen chorus. If I was just looking for validation though I suppose I could run to the Democratic Underground. I might end effectively lobotomized but I could do it
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 7/22/25 at 11:45 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Did you mean to use the term pre-textual? Because pre-textual stops are legal.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 12:06 am to AUcs13
quote:IF the actual pretext is a violation. Which, frankly, is a shite decision by the court but still.
Did you mean to use the term pre-textual? Because pre-textual stops are legal.
"No lights because of inclement weather" when IT IS NOT frickING RAINING ain't it.
The courts have NEVER ruled cops can pull you over for completely made up shite.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 12:17 am to Grumpy Nemesis
There needs to be a preset packet of documents that need to be presented to an officer. Once presented, there needs to be zero conversation expected from driver. Write him a ticket, or let him go.
Crack window, hand documents and politely say all information is included and accurate.
Why on earth does there need to be a conversation? Video is there and can be provided should you dispute the ticket.
Crack window, hand documents and politely say all information is included and accurate.
Why on earth does there need to be a conversation? Video is there and can be provided should you dispute the ticket.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 12:31 am to Grumpy Nemesis
Police can lawfully ask you to leave the vehicle during a traffic stop. As soon as he closed the door and refused they had the right to yank him out. He could have gotten out of the vehicle, refused to identify and then provided documents under threat of arrest. He would have received citations that would be dismissed and then would have had a federal lawsuit for rights violations against the officer/department/county. Driver is an idiot.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:58 am to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
Police can lawfully ask you to leave the vehicle during a traffic stop. As soon as he closed the door and refused they had the right to yank him out
2 things.
1. This skips right over the fact the officer pulled the guy over for not having his lights on in inclement weather AND IT WASN"T RAINING!!!!! Come on
2. Ya know. There's no rule that says a cop has to get violent inside of 20 seconds.
I'm continually fascinated by how people like you treat these interactions as if we're talking about coequals in terms of responsibility. "Oh, if the driver had only been better.......blah blah blah". You always have higher expectations of the citizen than you do the fricking supposed professional who is an agent of the state and STARTED the interaction in the 1st place.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:09 am to hogcard1964
quote:
They should have beaten him senseless
“Sovereign citizens” should get a double whupping, make sure the lesson resonates
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:20 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
Grumpy Nemesis
I appreciate your takes and your videos.
So many idiots on this forum claim to be conservative, yet they're too stupid to realize that conservatives do not support tyrannical govt. They believe if you exercise your right to remain silent, then "you're not complying with the wishes of the blue!!!"
They literally end up rooting for the overreaching big govt tyrannical cops, a leftist take.
I grew up respecting the police about 95 percent of the time. That's changed in the past ten years or so
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:37 am to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
I grew up respecting the police about 95 percent of the time. That's changed in the past ten years or so
So you were raised right and made an adult choice to be an idiot.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:43 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
“Sovereign citizens” should get a double whupping, make sure the lesson resonates
Sovereign citizens are fricking morons. Alas, a lot of people think everyone who has an issue with police operating outside their legal authority are "sovereign citizens".
No. SCs are idiots who don't even really think the government has any authority to pass laws affecting them. They think they've found some weird loophole exempting themselves.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:44 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
I'm not supposed to expect the driver to be fricking professional. I mean it's nice if he is but there's no reason for me to expect it
Having such low expectations for hoodrats and being alright with it is a huge, huge problem in American society right now.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:45 am to TheDeerHunter
quote:
So you were raised right and made an adult choice to be an idiot.
There is absolutely zero reason to consider a police officer as anything special in terms of having authority over you unless they have a LEGAL REASON to.
People act like every thought that passes thru a cop's head equals a "lawful order" if they say it out loud. A police officer is just some dude no different than any other dude;
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:47 am to VADawg
quote:Alas, there are literally thousands of videos of NON "hoodrats" dealing with shite cops too.
Having such low expectations for hoodrats and being alright with it is a huge, huge problem in American society right now.
Also, sorry. It's just fricking weird that you cannot distinguish between the expectations we should have of OUR HIRED AGENTS OF THE STATE versus random citizens.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:53 am to Grumpy Nemesis
the headlight thing is ridiculous, and none of the police cruisers had their headlights on either
the POS cop D Bowers (notice how the dept protects the cop's first name, but the "suspect"'s name is plastered all over the media - fricking cowards)
Bowers lied his arse off on saying McNeil "reached for a knife in the floorboard".
"Officer" Bowers is a fagot coward for throwing multiple sucker punches when McNeil couldn't fight back.
The POS police chief is a pathological lying demagogue, lecturing the media because he's used to getting his arse kissed.
I hope "Officer D Bowers" life is pure hell for the next ten years. I hope he's washing dishes at Burger King.
ETA: I hope the police chief's pompous arse is fired, and I hope the city of Jacksonville ends up paying millions in damages.
the POS cop D Bowers (notice how the dept protects the cop's first name, but the "suspect"'s name is plastered all over the media - fricking cowards)
Bowers lied his arse off on saying McNeil "reached for a knife in the floorboard".
"Officer" Bowers is a fagot coward for throwing multiple sucker punches when McNeil couldn't fight back.
The POS police chief is a pathological lying demagogue, lecturing the media because he's used to getting his arse kissed.
I hope "Officer D Bowers" life is pure hell for the next ten years. I hope he's washing dishes at Burger King.
ETA: I hope the police chief's pompous arse is fired, and I hope the city of Jacksonville ends up paying millions in damages.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 6:07 am
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:55 am to TheDeerHunter
quote:
TheDeerHunter
someone can't read
Popular
Back to top


0





