- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jabs increase risk for 7 major types of cancer
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:01 pm to Night Vision
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:01 pm to Night Vision
Turbo cancer too. Very fast.
0
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is false.
Good to know Dr Hail. I almost wasted a $25 copay at the Oncologist.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:06 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Two landmark studies
Post the studies and let's discuss.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:07 pm to L1C4
Have you seen his post history? q tard tarding hard.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is false.
What is your evidence for it being false? The studies present evidence of facts.
Is your evidence for it being false, your feelings? Nerd.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:10 pm to Night Vision
"Almost 90% Of Positive Covid Tests Were false"
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:11 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
What is your evidence for it being false?
What is your evidence for believing it?
quote:
The studies present evidence of facts.
Which study did you read? None have been posted in this thread.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:11 pm to BTROleMisser
The man that created the PCR tests told them they were using the tests incorrectly and they killed him for it.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:12 pm to Night Vision
It is always Hulscher. They really need to pick another dude to run point on this shite.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:13 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
onmymedicalgrind
Remember everyone this guy went to medical school making him a world renowned professional on virology, genealogy, and vaccinations!
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:14 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
quote:
What is your evidence for it being false?
What is your evidence for believing it?
Actual conducted studies on 8 million people, touted by qualified medical experts who have been correct about everything through the entire pandemic until now? Bitch.
quote:
Which study did you read? None have been posted in this thread.
So, actual studies, among many, concluding the clot shots also cause turbo cancer are < "This is false." - HHTM
Cool. Got it. You fricking moron.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:14 pm to Errerrerrwere
Weird melt
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:15 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Weird melt
Tell the class what kid of doctor you are then...
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:15 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Lots of people in denial about that shot they had to take for being weak minded fools.
Obesity and Diabetes are a much better danger to the fatties on here than any vaccine.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:16 pm to ronricks
quote:
Obesity and Diabetes are a much better danger to the fatties on here than any vaccine.
Still doesn't take away the fact that these threads are a bat signal for those that did.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:17 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Actual conducted studies on 8 million people, touted by qualified medical experts who have been correct about everything through the entire pandemic until now?
Cool. Which study did you read? Share the link so we can discuss.
quote:
Bitch
Angry lil feller, huh?
quote:
So, actual studies, among many, concluding the clot shots also cause turbo cancer are
Cool. Which study did you read? Share the link so we can discuss.
quote:
You fricking moron.
Angry lil feller, huh?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:18 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Tell the class what kid of doctor you are then...
The “kid” that knows how to read research studies.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:18 pm to BTROleMisser
The studies in question were observational and identified statistical associations, which the authors and health experts emphasize do not prove a causal link. The observed associations can be attributed to confounding factors and limitations within the studies' methodologies:
Observational Data: The studies noted epidemiological associations but explicitly stated that further research was warranted to explore potential causal links.
Confounding Factors: Researchers pointed to the "healthy vaccinee bias" (vaccinated people generally interact more with the healthcare system and are more likely to have pre-existing conditions recorded) as a potential explanation for the findings.
Contradictory Findings: One of the studies found the association for some cancers disappeared or reversed when a longer time lag (e.g., 12 months) between vaccination and cancer hospitalization was considered.
Observational Data: The studies noted epidemiological associations but explicitly stated that further research was warranted to explore potential causal links.
Confounding Factors: Researchers pointed to the "healthy vaccinee bias" (vaccinated people generally interact more with the healthcare system and are more likely to have pre-existing conditions recorded) as a potential explanation for the findings.
Contradictory Findings: One of the studies found the association for some cancers disappeared or reversed when a longer time lag (e.g., 12 months) between vaccination and cancer hospitalization was considered.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:20 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
The “kid” that knows how to read research studies.
As an engineer; not only can I read them, I can understand and make judgment calls on the data.
Do you think you need an M.D. to do that? If so, you give yourself way too much credit and probably smell your own farts
AND
could have saved yourself a shitload of money.
Back to the point though. What kind of doctor are you again? Tell the class...
Posted on 12/9/25 at 4:29 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
As an engineer; not only can I read them, I can understand and make judgment calls on the data
Well then post the study you read that validates the conclusion in the OP so we can discuss. JFC what’s going on here
quote:
could have saved yourself a shitload of money.
I’d say my ROI has been pretty nice.
quote:
Back to the point though. What kind of doctor are you again?
When did this become “the point?” I’m trying to discuss the OP!
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News