Started By
Message
locked post

It's truly a shame that it's a forgone conclusion all the Democrats vote no

Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:26 am
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53774 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:26 am
on SCOTUS nominee.

When is the media and frankly the President going to hammer the obvious obstruction of serving the American people they were sworn in to do as Senate leaders?

Dick Durbin on CNN said "all it takes is one Republican to vote no and this confirmation is over" (he was talking about McCain being out or unavailable.

So on national TV before the SCOTUS pick was announced this clown was on cable news telling all of us how the Democrats would play this situation. "We must stop the President's pick"...but offered no reason...

What in the hell is going on in our government?

I mean really, how do these people sleep at night?

A judge is either qualified or they are not...Kav seems to be qualified and likable....

The politics around the court is something I guess I will never understand...

Posted by BananaPeel
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2016
265 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:31 am to
It is about to be their Alamo. They are surrounded. They will fight to their death, which isn't far off.

Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79203 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:35 am to
Think of it as life being sucked out of them like death throes
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7837 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:35 am to
quote:

all it takes is one Republican to vote no and this confirmation is over


Maybe I have been watching too much House of Cards, but if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:38 am to
quote:

When is the media and frankly the President going to hammer the obvious obstruction of serving the American people they were sworn in to do as Senate leaders?


You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:39 am to
quote:

You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?


This is relevant how? Whataboutisms are tired, lazy, and completely insufficient as justification for actions.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 6:41 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:43 am to
They won’t all vote no.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31927 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:43 am to
Same thing Republicans said about Obama if he had made a nominee....
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41292 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:44 am to
Lazy answer
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101471 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:46 am to
quote:



You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?




What was the vote tally on him?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Maybe I have been watching too much House of Cards, but if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?



51 Rs in the Senate. 47 Ds and 2 indies. Let's say McCain doesn't vote. All other Rs vote yea. Let's say the 47 and 2 vote nay. From what I know, Pence can only vote in case of a tie vote. Therefore, 50-49 won't get a vote from Pence so I surmise the vote would fail since you need a 50 plus 1 in order for the nomination to pass.

Anyone correct me if I'm wrong. I might be.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16989 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:50 am to
quote:

This is relevant how? Whataboutisms are tired, lazy, and completely insufficient as justification for actions.



Irrational justification last time caused it this time.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 6:52 am
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31927 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Lazy answer

Why? I’m not saying I think Dems should reject any candidate outright, in fact I think that’s irresponsible as representatives of the people.

I’m saying Republicans are no better and would do the same thing if the roles were reversed. Both sides are too obsessed with “winning” a fight to actually make smart choices
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Irrational justification last time caused it this time.


No, politicians who think like you, i.e, in juvenile terms of winning, payback, and pandering to uneducated voters is what caused it this time. It’s also why they are collectively the most ineffective body of people in the country.

The National political issues/discussion could very very easily be elevated to a more productive and substantive level. Irresponsible and shortsighted politicians and their complicit buddies in the media simply choose not to.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 7:02 am
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42633 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:03 am to
quote:

t if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?


Senate is now 50-49 GOP. If one GOP votes 'no' then it is 49-50 = no tie.
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Senate is now 50-49 GOP. If one GOP votes 'no' then it is 49-50 = no tie.


Yep. Because John McCain is nothing more than a self serving politician who cares more about grandstanding and his “legacy” than actually performing his duties as a representative of the people of Arizona.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Senate is now 50-49 GOP.


So you're saying McCain is a no-show?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131411 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:11 am to
Realistically, McCain will never leave Arizona again.

It’s a shame but the Senate has become so partisan it will pretty much be a party line vote.
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:13 am to
Merrick Garland thinks it totally unfair that some democrats are already pledging to vote no
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:15 am to
quote:



You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?

What was the vote tally on him?




How many committee hearings took place on Garland?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram