Started By
Message

re: It's Mueller's burden to prove the necessity of an interview with President Trump

Posted on 1/28/18 at 6:13 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
46232 posts
Posted on 1/28/18 at 6:13 am to
quote:

in the sense that Trump the candidate and Russian meddling have a possible nexus of connectivity and I can see a judge finding such.


What is this 'nexus" and how probable is the 'possibility?'

I am unaware of anything besides the dossier. And I don't even know what is in that.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131356 posts
Posted on 1/28/18 at 6:35 am to
quote:

How do you know a crime has or has not been committed if you can’t question anyone?

First off, are you honestly asserting Mueller "can’t question anyone?"
Are you honestly asserting that he hasn't questioned a litany of individuals?

Second, in terms of "knowing a crime has or has not been committed," there is something called EVIDENCE.
In absence of evidence, there is something called presumption of innocence.

I know evidence and proof are unpopular precepts among Prog book-burners.
Nonetheless they are foundational to our country.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram