- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is immigration an inalienable constitutional right to all non-citizens?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:27 pm
...or is it a privilege?
Maybe we should start there?
...and go.
Maybe we should start there?
...and go.
19
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:28 pm to KaiserSoze99
Privilege.
Frankly we never should have let you white eyes in.
Frankly we never should have let you white eyes in.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:29 pm to KaiserSoze99
No
The thing is the new world order/illumati types want unfettered immigration into western countries to destroy whites and western civilization
It's why we don't see them trying to force all these refugees and 3rd worlders into places like Japan
The thing is the new world order/illumati types want unfettered immigration into western countries to destroy whites and western civilization
It's why we don't see them trying to force all these refugees and 3rd worlders into places like Japan
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:35 pm to KaiserSoze99
Do you consider china yours?
Do you consider Iran yours?
Do you consider Syria yours?
Do you consider Zimbabwe yours?
The US is no one other than US citizens' either, US citizens have the right to decide who they bring in just like every other nation does. There are times when it's necessary to supplement our population and times it's not.
We are the most recently founded of the world powers (population wise, not regime). There was a time mass immigration was necessary to spread west and strengthen/grow. Every country/region on earth went through this phase. That time has past, we are established
Do all practices that led to the development of the current US apply due to precedent, or just ones protected by the constitution?
Do you think we still should capture people and bring them over as slaves because it was a part of early America?
Do you consider Iran yours?
Do you consider Syria yours?
Do you consider Zimbabwe yours?
The US is no one other than US citizens' either, US citizens have the right to decide who they bring in just like every other nation does. There are times when it's necessary to supplement our population and times it's not.
We are the most recently founded of the world powers (population wise, not regime). There was a time mass immigration was necessary to spread west and strengthen/grow. Every country/region on earth went through this phase. That time has past, we are established
Do all practices that led to the development of the current US apply due to precedent, or just ones protected by the constitution?
Do you think we still should capture people and bring them over as slaves because it was a part of early America?
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:35 pm to KaiserSoze99
https://postimg.org/image/h4kphak2b/
Times have changed obviously from the original intention.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 2:35 pm to KaiserSoze99
The Left would like to make it so.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 2:45 pm to KaiserSoze99
It's a privilege and those who do it legally for citizenship appreciate its significance in the immigration ceremony.
Immigration is bound by laws via the INS as per Green Cards and citizenship requiring U.S. & applicant criminal background checks, fingerprinting, U.S. interview, etc.
If you're here illegally, you're not an illegal immigrant, you're an invader.
Immigration is bound by laws via the INS as per Green Cards and citizenship requiring U.S. & applicant criminal background checks, fingerprinting, U.S. interview, etc.
If you're here illegally, you're not an illegal immigrant, you're an invader.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 2/4/17 at 2:47 pm to KaiserSoze99
Apparently.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:00 pm to KaiserSoze99
It's inalienable right to be treated equal under the law regardless of nationality. But a government has the right to vet out criminal immigrants to maintain order.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:04 pm to gogotigers
Criminal?
A country has the right to allow or deny immigration for whatever damn reason they see fit.
A country has the right to allow or deny immigration for whatever damn reason they see fit.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:08 pm to KaiserSoze99
Can someone provide the exact century and decade we should have shut down our borders to immigration?
Be specific. Let's pin this shite down once and for all and if anyone says 2009 we're going to ban you.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:08 pm to KaiserSoze99
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:11 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
All men?
You sexist fricking pig
You sexist fricking pig
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:17 pm to KaiserSoze99
the US of A is not Wal Mart were anyone at any time can just walk in, we are a privet, exclusive club, you can come in but you have to follow the rules. First rule is you have to show ID.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:31 pm to Scoop
quote:
A country has the right to allow or deny immigration for whatever damn reason they see fit.
Yes they do but that does not equal a justified reason for using the force of government to do it.
Inherently, we should not want to ban people who mean us no harm.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:34 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Is immigration an inalienable constitutional right to all non-citizens?
Absolutely not, IMO. However, the rules should be similar across the board.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:36 pm to dantes69
quote:
the US of A is not Wal Mart were anyone at any time can just walk in
You either believe in the government as intended by our Founders, or you do not.
They thought anyone should be welcomed into the country.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:41 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
they believed all people could carry a gun at any time, anywhere, and use it for any reason.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:43 pm to dantes69
quote:
they believed all people could carry a gun at any time, anywhere, and use it for any reason.
No, they didn't.
Link?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:43 pm to gogotigers
Correct, you stop them and then attempt to determine if they mean harm
You don't let them in and then do a determination
The infrastructure of access and travel to this country is massive. We aren't attempting to protect a country the size of Sweden or any random European nation
There will never be a system of vetting in a country as massive as ours and with a population of 300+ million that does not unfortunately cause issues with people it does not intend to
As someone who does not like a powerful federal government I do recognize that it serves some basic functions. One of those functions being the protection of its citizens public health and welfare, that is its first and basic function
It's also
Important to recognize that there will ALWAYS be a tension between complete liberty and public safety, always. Especially in a country this massive
For a country to exist, total liberty cannot
You don't let them in and then do a determination
The infrastructure of access and travel to this country is massive. We aren't attempting to protect a country the size of Sweden or any random European nation
There will never be a system of vetting in a country as massive as ours and with a population of 300+ million that does not unfortunately cause issues with people it does not intend to
As someone who does not like a powerful federal government I do recognize that it serves some basic functions. One of those functions being the protection of its citizens public health and welfare, that is its first and basic function
It's also
Important to recognize that there will ALWAYS be a tension between complete liberty and public safety, always. Especially in a country this massive
For a country to exist, total liberty cannot
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 3:49 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News