- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is immigration an inalienable constitutional right to all non-citizens?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:37 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:37 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Weird that no one made this argument for Obama's 6 immigration EOs.
What was the legal argument made in the 5th Circuit that blocked his EO regarding immigration?
0
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:44 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:Hell fricking no.
Is immigration an inalienable constitutional right to all non-citizens?
End of discussion.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:46 pm to llfshoals
quote:You tried to stop us, but civilization prevailed.
Frankly we never should have let you white eyes in.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:51 pm to Scoop
quote:Thanks Hugo!
Criminal?
A country has the right to allow or deny immigration for whatever damn reason they see fit.
Glad to see you've finally come to your senses.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:53 pm to Sao
quote:September 12th, 2001.
Can someone provide the exact century and decade we should have shut down our borders to immigration?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:56 pm to gogotigers
quote:Seems like we've had a pretty bad track record in deciding that.
we should not want to ban people who mean us no harm.
9/11/01?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 10:58 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
They thought anyone should be welcomed into the country.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:09 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Yes, I remember reading about our founding fathers advocating for people from foreign lands to immigrate to America who did not share our beliefs or values.
They thought anyone should be welcomed into the country.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 8:39 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
Seems like we've had a pretty bad track record in deciding that.
9/11/01?
Yes we’ve done a very poor job. We should do a better job of keeping those wishing to do us harm and undermine/ over throw our law order out. All I am saying is if our sight is set on those trying to do harm then inalienable rights for immigrants is salvageable. If we go with the idea we can ban people for ANY arbitrary reasons like they have blonde hair/ blue eyes, or they were born on a certain date or their name is Joe. Reasons like this would be arbitrary, unjust and kill the idea of inalienable rights.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 8:47 am to Sao
quote:
Can someone provide the exact century and decade we should have shut down our borders to immigration?
Be specific. Let's pin this shite down once and for all and if anyone says 2009 we're going to ban you.
One could even argue as early as 1935
But certainly by the 1960s after the expansion of the welfare state under Lyndon Johnson's Great society.
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 8:51 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:09 am to WildTchoupitoulas
This statement shows that you may very well be the dumbest motherfricker on the board, and THAT is saying something.
"Anyone", my dying arse!
"Anyone", my dying arse!
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:12 am to KaiserSoze99
Every nation has a right to manage immigration as they see fit. As such, non-citizens have no inalienable rights relative to immigration. Europe is the obvious example of what can happen when immigration runs amok. Allowing Muslims, who have no intention of assimilating into the culture of the recipient nation, is a horrible idea.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News