- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:02 pm to t00f
Them tig ole bitties. All natural too, baws. None of that hard as rocks silicon shite.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:02 pm to slackster
quote:
Because they're hypocritical.
And pathetic like all the ppl defending this
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:03 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:If a one private corporation can filter content on their network why can’t another?
Yeah - in the context of this discussion
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:03 pm to DelU249
quote:
as do we all. I don't have it as the #1 priority and i'm not so obsessed with it that I throw all common sense out of the window and ignore reality.
I don't think I do that, but maybe so.
Idk, I'm not exactly drawn to threads where I agree with the consensus. Posting +1 or upvoting is boring.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:03 pm to BamaAtl
quote:ill take irrelevant assertions for $500, Alex.
Facebook and youtube aren't utilities.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:04 pm to AUstar
quote:
he claims to be running a "news" organization.
Unless he's in court, then his lawyer says that "no reasonable person would believe what he says" and that his show is "opinion masquerading as fact". (This was just last week.)
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:05 pm to Salmon
quote:
wait, what?
They need to decide if they are a publisher or a platform, obviously none of you have followed the court decisions in regards to this. If they want to censor or play favorites they can but then they are legally responsible for ALL content on their site as a publisher.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:05 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
And pathetic like all the ppl defending this
I think there is a difference between saying this is shitty behavior and saying you want government intervention like some of those in here. Invoking constitutional protections like free speech is also dumb considering the context.
None of that changes the fact it is a sketch decision.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:06 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
ill take irrelevant assertions
As usual, you missed the point.
He said ISPs can't censor, but facebook/youtube can, and that's the same thing. Except it's not, because ISPs are utilities, and fb/yt are not.
Glad you're caught up now!
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:06 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Zero issue them blocking him. Also zero issue with anyone refusing to do business with another, outside of unique circumstances.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:06 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
So is that a yes or no? Cause FB lets people perform murders live
I hope you're donating your brain after your inevitable resignation. Is it a chemical imbalance that makes you a fricking idiot? Underdeveloped brain components? CTE? Drug abuse? Brainwash?
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:07 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:They can?
If a one private corporation can filter content on their network why can’t another?
So why'd you say they couldn't filter content?
Content is filtered on this very board every day
Tigerdroppings is not an ISP as far as I know
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:08 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Ability to incite the people is one of the reasons for the 1A.
There's a troublesome trend on this board.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:10 pm to BamaAtl
quote:A point would have to exist for me to miss it.
As usual, you missed the point.
quote:Feel free to repeat this as many times as you like. It won’t rehabilitate the irrelevance of it.
Except it's not, because ISPs are utilities, and fb/yt are not.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:10 pm to slackster
quote:
saying you want government intervention like some of those in here
I never said that. Id prefer TrumpTv, Trumptube, Trumpitter, Trumpgram and Troogle to counter this hypocrisy.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:11 pm to Taxing Authority
I think the confusion is coming from your phrasing, or rather their reading of it:
I believe they're reading this as you claiming that only ISPs have the right to filter content.
quote:
Unless you’re an ISP... then you have no rights to filter content.
I believe they're reading this as you claiming that only ISPs have the right to filter content.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:12 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
I never said that
I know that, but some did.
quote:
Id prefer TrumpTv, Trumptube, Trumpitter, Trumpgram and Troogle to counter this hypocrisy.
, we may get it eventually. Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:12 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:I thought “all traffic was to be treated equal”. At least that’s what the net neutrality proponents said.
So why'd you say they couldn't filter content?
quote:And... no one claimed it was.
Content is filtered on this very board every day Tigerdroppings is not an ISP as far as I know
This post was edited on 8/6/18 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 8/6/18 at 4:13 pm to PEPE
quote:
Private businesses can discriminate but not if they are abusing monopoly power (which Google clearly is)
That's odd, because I just visited bing.com and it still works.
This post was edited on 8/6/18 at 4:14 pm
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News