- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:37 pm to Iron Lion
I take it that when the Iranian Islamist regime openly calls America “The Great Satan,” even over and above Israel, and further calls for the annihilation of our country, you’re guessing they’re just teasing? I don’t know why, but I’m just getting (or have gotten) the sense that they really mean it, ya know. I just don’t know what to think about a Islamic fundamentalist regime who would end up having a nuclear weapon that by all accounts they’ll easily be able to deliver such a weapon to American soil. Am I 1,000% certain about that? Not exactly. But I’ll take their own word for it.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:38 pm to Penrod
True enough, but nukes would make the threat exponentially worse.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:38 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Now that is something everyone should understand
What everyone should understand is that many countries have nukes. Only one has ever actually used them. That one is now assuming moral high ground.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:42 pm to UtahCajun
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:44 pm to UtahCajun
Guys that used IEDs and VBIEDs. Proxy groups throughout the Middle East would never threaten the Gulf region with a nuke.

Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:47 pm to VOR
quote:
The question remains, as of this date, are you prepared for America to send in ground troops to either pacify the country or to secure uranium enrichment sites?
You're missing the point.
What you or I think about it is of no consequence, and not just because we can't make any decisions about it.
The last two Commanders in Chief, both of whom have had access to information that you and I will never have access to (both classified and non-classified), apparently were/are willing to do whatever it takes. Including whatever scenario you keep asking about.
What else did those two agree on? Tariffs, I guess.
Those are the only two things I can think of.
That leads me to believe that what they know/knew that we don't know and will never know is pretty compelling.
If you want to ask me, "If you know what they knew and know, as of this date, are you prepared for America to send in ground troops to either pacify the country or to secure uranium enrichment sites?"
Then I'm going to say, yeah, probably.
I can't imagine my perspective being sufficiently outside the last two CIC's that I would siagree with them both, being that they were pretty much diametrically opposed.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:49 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
Only one has ever actually used them.
And the reason no one else has is because the one who has used them has more than the other countries.
quote:
That one is now assuming moral high ground.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:51 pm to Kat Kat
The second they got one, Israel would nuke them first. They don't win this without Allah coming down and saving them.
Ain't happening.
Ain't happening.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:51 pm to VOR
quote:
The question remains, as of this date, are you prepared for America to send in ground troops to either pacify the country or to secure uranium enrichment sites?
Have you stopped cheating on your taxes?
Which of your bad habits is the worst?
Are you still beating your wife ?
need some more loaded questions ?
Posted on 3/14/26 at 3:59 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
That one is now assuming moral high ground.
It deserves it. WW2 is not comparable to today. Also, Japan was given plenty of chances
to negotiate or surrender before Hiroshima
Posted on 3/14/26 at 4:38 pm to Kat Kat
quote:
Kat Kat
Your brother, Kit, is clearly the smarter sibling.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 5:07 pm to Kat Kat
quote:
Iran would rule the Middle East via nuclear blackmail.
Israel has nukes. How would Iran blackmail a country with nukes?
quote:
Iran would have ballistic nuclear missiles capable of hitting all of Europe and the. east coast of USA.
MAD.
quote:
Iran/North Korea/China/Russia alliance against the West get ready for the end of the dollar as the currency.
Why hasn’t an NK/China/Russia alliance formed to end the dollar as the world’s currency?
quote:
hyper inflation in the USA, 30 % unemployment and our cities burning because we can no longer afford the welfare state. Gas $10 a gallon if you can find it.
We’d just do what we’re doing now—bomb the shite out of people.
We’re America. We’ve been fricking up other areas of the world for decades to ensure our interests.
Posted on 3/14/26 at 5:11 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:The other GCC countries would be held hostage primarily Saudia Arabia, they would dictate the terms of everything the Gulf stated do.
Israel has nukes. How would Iran blackmail a country with nukes?
quote:What the frick are they going to bring to the table to do that?
Why hasn’t an NK/China/Russia alliance formed to end the dollar as the world’s currency?
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:14 pm to davyjones
quote:
You’re equating American moral ground to Iranian moral ground? When was the last time the American government wholesale slaughtered its citizens for merely protesting?
Bruuuuhhhh....
Kent State
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:16 pm to UtahCajun
quote:equates wholesale slaughter.
Kent State
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:17 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
And the reason no one else has is because the one who has used them has more than the other countries
There is one really evil nation with more.
quote:
If you think anything about foreign policy (for anyone) has anything to do with "moral high ground," you need to exit this discussion right away
I am not under that illusion. Never have been. TUSA does what it does to ensure its own power.
I think others may be under the illusion that we have some sort of moral high ground. They should most likely leave.
This post was edited on 3/15/26 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:18 pm to Jbird
quote:
equates wholesale slaughter
It was slaughter none-the-less.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:19 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
It was slaughter none-the-less.
Posted on 3/15/26 at 12:23 pm to Kat Kat
neocons fearmongering again
where are their nukes?
you guys fall for this for almost 40 years.

where are their nukes?
you guys fall for this for almost 40 years.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
This post was edited on 3/15/26 at 12:27 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





