Started By
Message

re: I'll ask AGAIN, why are DEMS so damn terrified of Matt dead lift Whitaker?

Posted on 11/12/18 at 4:54 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

But he has a R behind his name as it should be. Because the President has an R behind his name and the DOJ is a executive branch function that serves at the pleasure of the Executive just like they have done in prior administrations and party affiliations.


Makes no sense relative to my post.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14179 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Do you think that, as Sessions Chief of Staff, Whitaker didn't keep track of the Mueller investigation?

100%.I believe all parties have acknowledged that.

I was called a "dishonest little pile of shite" by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay for suggesting just that.

I guess your percentage should be 99.9%.

Or you could leave it at 100% and change the next sentence to "I believe all intelligible parties have acknowledged that.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 5:54 pm to
He’ll be a great wing man
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3058 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 5:57 pm to
1) He won't recuse himself

2) He's not going to sit on his arse and do nothing
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42584 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

The problem with Whitaker is that he supports (Christian) sharia law... having claimed that judges should have a “biblical view,” that he could not support nominees who are “secular”.


Is he in position to weigh in on SCOTUS justices??

Is some sort of religious test now the name of the game for libtards??
Posted by TuDog
Boston
Member since Jun 2005
4154 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 5:59 pm to
Terrified of everyone. Protest everyone.
DT continues the winning.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

I was called a "dishonest little pile of shite" by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay for suggesting just that.
If you said Whitaker didn't keep track of the Mueller investigation, and HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay called you dishonest for that opinion, HHHATW was wrong.

However, I suspect you simply misread my response, or he misread yours.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14179 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

However, I suspect you simply misread my response, or he misread yours.

Seems like I misread yours.

Do you think that, as Sessions Chief of Staff, Whitaker did or did not keep track of the Mueller investigation?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:45 pm to
What does that matter when Whitaker wasn't involved with the Trump campaign? His being aware of the investigation is absolutely irrelevant.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:10 pm to
Wrong.

Not scared.

Certain.

He has said he thinks the Mueller Russia aspect is bogosity.

Hence he's not able to be impartial.

In fact 15 Russians have been indicted already and trump just has call his pal putIn and they will be remanded into custody of the fbi so they can expound on who in the trump campaign worked with Wikileaks and muh russkys.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 10:11 pm
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

In fact 15 Russians have been indicted already and trump just has call his pal putIn and they will be remanded into custody of the fbi so they can expound on who in the trump campaign worked with Wikileaks and muh russkys.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Hence he's not able to be impartial.
Why does he have to be impartial? Is he a judge? On a jury? Is he participating in writing Mueller’s report?

No to all of these.

So, why does he need to be impartial, Otto?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

In fact 15 Russians have been indicted already and trump just has call his pal putIn and they will be remanded into custody of the fbi so they can expound on who in the trump campaign worked with Wikileaks and muh russkys.
You just proved yourself to be totally clueless about what they were indicted for.
Posted by PaulieJ
Member since Nov 2018
51 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:16 pm to
It’s not just liberals.
Conservatives like Jennifer Rubin and Bill Kristol have joined Ruth Marcus and Dana Milbank in blasting Whitaker.
So you see it’s not just liberals, it’s a wise swath of journalists whose only common denominator are being journalists.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:16 pm to
Hey new guy tell us about yourself!
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Conservatives like Jennifer Rubin and Bill Kristol have joined Ruth Marcus and Dana Milbank in blasting Whitaker



it's a bad look that his most recent private work was for a company found guilty of fraud and he had a hand in it.
Posted by Highway_Man
Member since May 2014
291 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Wrong.

Not scared.

Certain.

He has said he thinks the Mueller Russia aspect is bogosity.

Hence he's not able to be impartial.

In fact 15 Russians have been indicted already and trump just has call his pal putIn and they will be remanded into custody of the fbi so they can expound on who in the trump campaign worked with Wikileaks and muh russkys.



At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14807 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 2:39 am to


Because he's gonna break Mueller Bane-style
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 3:21 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/3/20 at 9:14 am
Posted by Volkosoby
Member since May 2017
2699 posts
Posted on 11/13/18 at 3:33 am to
That's a bad bad man
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram