Started By
Message

re: If you vote for a democrat or a republican next election you are supporting this

Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:30 am to
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:30 am to
quote:

It went to millions of those who pay no federal income taxes. Should have been more targeted, but doubtful that would have passed.


Yup

Bottom line. This OP dude is an idiot who is completely ineffective but thinks he's "doing something"
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:32 am to
quote:


You realize voting for republican is still voting for a dem right?
Absurd

quote:

look at Cassidy.
LOOK AT ONE GUY

Cause, you know, a Vote for Cruz was no different than for Beto

Or, for Trump was no different than Hillary

Or, for DeSantis was no different than for his fig druggie opponent
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Message
If you vote for a democrat or a republican next election you are supporting this
Been saying that since I've been able to vote and as long as I've posted on here.

I've never once in my life voted Democrat or republican for a president.

And I do feel that anyone who votes either side can't really complain because this is what you signed up for and it'll never ever ever be resolved as long as democrats and Republicans dominate the votes.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:33 am to
quote:

It is. Sorry you can't understand that
Throwing away a vote, as you call it, is less detrimental than voting for a democrat or republican.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Are you operating under the assumption that 100% of the people who run as a Dem or Rep are compromised?
I have zero reason to operate under any other assumption than this.
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Throwing away a vote, as you call it, is less detrimental than voting for a democrat or republican.

Well that's silly given that, by definition, it's a vote for one of them.

If voting in a competitive race, voting third party is exactly equivalent to voting for the one of the other 2 that you like the least.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Well that's silly given that, by definition, it's a vote for one of them.
and voting for one of them, democrats or Republicans, is why we're in this political hell hole so no its not silly to say voting either D or R is the most detrimental.
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:41 am to
quote:

and voting for one of them, democrats or Republicans, is why we're in this political hell hole so no its not silly to say voting either D or R is the most detrimental.

And, to repeat.

Voting 3rd party is EXACTLY EQUIVALENT to voting for the one of those two you LEAST like.

Congrats on looking at something fricked up and devising a way to guarantee it hits its fricked up maximum!!!!
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Voting 3rd party is EXACTLY EQUIVALENT to voting for the one of those two you LEAST like.
It's quite literally not, but ok.

But I'll ask, what if I dislike all democrats and Republicans equally? You're thinking of this as an individual thing, but the issue is collective.

quote:

Congrats on looking at something fricked up and devising a way to guarantee it hits its fricked up maximum!!!!
Well irs certainly not, you'd be the one guaranteeing that, not me. If everyone follows your lead, we end up where we are now... just complete shite. If everyone followed my lead, it would force politicians to at least try to do more so right by the people because they'd no longer just get an auto vote by attaching a D or R next to their name.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:46 am to
The fight is with the globalists. You should be on that train too, not just be irrelevant
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25260 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:

This OP dude is an idiot who is completely ineffective but thinks he's "doing something"


wrong. I don't think i'm "doing something" at all. I know that my vote is just 1 vote and probably won't decide anything.
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:

It's quite literally not, but ok.


Yelling "nuh uh" doesn't change the indisputable nature of what I said.

quote:

But I'll ask, what if I dislike all democrats and Republicans equally?
You dislike all right leaning and left leaning ideas equally? Well, that's just weird.

quote:

You're thinking of this as an individual thing, but the issue is collective.

Collectively, while both have their issue, the stupid meme that they are exactly the same is, well, stupid.

quote:


Well irs certainly not, you'd be the one guaranteeing that, not me. If everyone follows your lead, we end up where we are now... just complete shite
Your approach changes nothing and, actually votes for the least liked of the two choices on your part no matter how desperately you try to avoid that reality.

quote:

If everyone followed my lead, it would force politicians to at least try to do more so right by the people because they'd no longer just get an auto vote by attaching a D or R next to their name.
Woo Hoo. The "I party" would definitely be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!!!


Good Lord
This post was edited on 1/16/22 at 11:48 am
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25260 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Voting 3rd party is EXACTLY EQUIVALENT to voting for the one of those two you LEAST like.


No. this is an absurd take.
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:48 am to
quote:

wrong. I don't think i'm "doing something" at all. I know that my vote is just 1 vote and probably won't decide anything.

But it COULD do something. You just don't know how, so, you've literally devised a way to eliminate the possibility.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:49 am to
Libertarian worked in the 1780’s
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:50 am to
quote:


No. this is an absurd take.



3 Candidates. 1A, 1B, 1C

2 have a chance. 1A, 1B

Gallo hates 1A a lot, hates 1B slightly less but still hates them, so gallo votes for 1C

Gallo just cost 1B a vote. Thus, helping 1A

Congrats.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Yelling "nuh uh" doesn't change the indisputable nature of what I said.
1-0 is entirely different than 0-0. I just easily disproved the indisputable thing you said.
quote:

You dislike all right leaning and left leaning ideas equally? Well, that's just weird.
Again, you're thinking small scope, not big picture.
quote:

Collectively, while both have their issue, the stupid meme that they are exactly the same is, well, stupid.

Never said they're the same, I said they're collectively the problem, the reason why politics is complete shite.
quote:

Your approach changes nothing and, actually votes for the least liked of the two choices on your part no matter how desperately you try to avoid that reality.
The idea that people should only vote for 1 of the top 2 candidates is wholely un-American, I imagine you know that.
quote:

Woo Hoo. The "I party" would definitely be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!!!

You're still completely whiffing on the point, which I've stated in every post. It has nothing to do with the I party being better.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25260 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Gallo just cost 1B a vote. Thus, helping 1A


are we voting in a vacuum?

because I don't remember the last time a Louisiana election was decided by 1 vote
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:52 am to
quote:

No. this is an absurd take.

NOW, let's pretend that gallo has a lot of like minded friends. Not enough to win mind you, but, certainly enough to be noticed. Let's say he's achieved 15% of the electorate.

Now, Candidates 1A and 1B are still the only viables but, 15% of the vote is gallo type.

If the gallos go for 1C, 1A and 1B really don't care much.

But, if 1A and 1B really feel they have a shot at the gallo party votes...........NOW, you might actually make a fricking difference!
Posted by AussieRock
Member since Jan 2022
329 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 11:54 am to
quote:

because I don't remember the last time a Louisiana election was decided by 1 vote

Which is why my original answer to you said, "by yourself, not much, but as a group, absolutely" your vote can matter.

And, to be blunt, in elections where your vote has no chance of mattering(say, a Repub vote in Cali), you aren't making any difference with any other choice you make either.

So, one presumes you are talking about when voting in a election where a small subset of votes might actually matter. If not, we're wasting time here.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram