Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:329
Registered on:1/7/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

If you think California, New York, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Washington, Oregon, Vermont and Maryland are red then you belong in a straight jacket.

They aren't red

But, I also don't trust ANY of their metro areas in terms of elections. They are all run by people who are any means necessary types.
By the way.

This Rasmussen poll of Democrats is but one more example of why we need to separate.

Of course, WildTchoupitoulas thinks this is all OK and just "America"

re: Liberals are absolutely deranged

Posted by AussieRock on 1/17/22 at 5:21 pm to
quote:


in truth she wasnt listening to anything you said and was just waiting to spout her talking points a


I was just in a social media thread today with mostly liberals in reference to Youngkin removing the schools mask mandate.

In one thread, inside of 10 minutes, I had people bring up Rittenhouse, Jan 6th, Trump, Fascism, and White Supremacy.

Mind you. My responses were 100%, ALL on the mask point and in support of the freedom associated with how masks provide nearly 0 protection nad simultaneously harm children socially.

There was utterly zero nexus between my posts and fascism, Jan 6th etc etc.

It's just like they all have, at any given moment, 6-8 standard things that pop out of their mouths every time they talk to a conservative. They have absolutely no original ideas of their own.
Yep.

Saving Democracy by threatening the families of political opponents.

That's who liberals are.
quote:

DeSantis is a threat to overtake Trump. And I hate this tactic.

Agreed.

It's completely retarded.
This smells fake as frick mostly because there are literally no identifying details. A common feature of fake
quote:

The problem with Presidential debates is that the questions and topics all slant towards the Democrats. Trans rights, race relations, climate change, voting rights, etc.


And they are ALL framed as, "hey Republican, why are you so fricked up on this issue" while conversely, "hey, Democrat, please take a moment to tell us how awesome you are".
As they should.

It's not a "debate" when the moderator thinks they're part of one side's debate team.
Invite him and whomever win the Australian Open.........offer to match the Aussie winner's money for both just to play and double for the winner.

Then, portray it as the "Real Australian Open Champion".
:lol:
It's like they decided to take Coulter's Law and triple down.
The thread about liberals talking down to minorities reminds me of a key point about liberals that often doesn't get discussed.

Namely, that a core problem liberals have is a complete inability to blame THEMSELVES for any negative traits they have or even take responsibility for them.

This is why liberal white people are so certain that all white people are inherently racist. It's because they know THEY are and, it simply MUST be something innate about being white that they can't help.

Almost every issue you can think of, the rhetoric around the liberal position is one of absolution from self blame.

It's why they run around telling conservatives that we've just been lucky in some way. This is an easy to give themselves absolution when they aren't as successful as they feel they should be.

But worse, it animates their bad behavior, both individually, and as a group. They simply say, "well yeah, but everyone else is gonna do it, so, I might as well too!".

It's why they say absurd shite like, "why do you people vote against your self interests?" Because, a liberal can't even conceive of the mind that votes based on its perception of right and wrong.

Speaking of which, how do liberals even get away with that last one? In what universe is it considered the moral high ground to only vote YOUR OWN interests? I mean shite. Basically, they're complimenting conservatives with that one(except, of course, they don't really mean we care about anyone else........they are just calling us stupid)
quote:

I think it's impossible to prove/disprove any claims.
Well that's silly.

quote:

And one could find dozens of sites that provide believable evidence to that end.
Exactly. Don't confuse "there are people immune to proof" with "you can't prove anything".

Why would ANYONE under the age of 70 want an Omicron Vaccine(other than compromised patients)
quote:

Because they were making it stronger by giving the central government more power than had existed under the Confederation. This is pretty widely known in our country.

Talk to us about how they viewed making it stronger. With excitement or trepidation?

Did they seek to make it a lot more powerful, or barely enough more powerful so that it could solve some of the AoC challenges?

What were the primary AoC challenges that led to the need for the convention?
quote:


And in doing so, you do concede that I've proven to you that my vote is not wasted, correct?
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought your goal was to improve things.

But, if you count making things worse as "not wasted" in search of your goal, I concede, your vote isn't wasted. LOL. Congrats!!!
quote:

Not only is the Union in perpetuity, but even that the federal government would have more power than the confederated one.
I've read every surviving letter exchanged between several key parties in the leadup to and during the constitutional convention. In the original English mind you.

Yes, they recognized the AoC was not going to work, but, they were scared shitless of giving the Fed too much power and spent a GREAT DEAL of time trying to come up with ways to constrict it.

Alas, they couldn't constrain future totalitarians like your people no matter how hard they tried.
quote:

perpetual Union

UNDER THE CONSTITUTION

With the constitution abandoned, you non longer have a union. And, we long since abandoned it. Hell, the people you vote for openly hate the thing, are running around the nation removing statues of the people involved in giving it to us while calling everyone involved a bunch of white supremacists.

Your party is nearly completely populated by people whose hatred for the document is perhaps only superseded by their hatred of the people who wrote and signed it.
quote:

a more perfect Union,

You bolded it so, go ahead. Tell us why they used that phrase.

This should be good.
quote:

And the Constitution itself was only ratified because our nation was founded upon the precept that our God-endowed Natural Rights precede man-made laws. Again, the Constitution would never have been ratified by the sovereign and independent states if the states believed that ratification meant the intended Union was to exist into perpetuity.

Any claim otherwise is to display an utter ignorance of the debates that surrounded the ratification of the Constitution. It may have taken over 200 years, but can any true supporter of the principles of limited government seriously disagree with the prophetic warnings of the Anti-Federalists?

Moreover, people need to remember that we were sort of drug kicking and screaming to the current constitution. The people involved in writing it or voting on it were largely the same people who wanted the Articles of Confederation.

These people quite obviously were very cautious about the idea of a strong federal government and sought to make it barely as strong as necessary.

Alas, from the start, leftist had other ideas.
quote:

It would cause people to research every candidate.

Agreed

Alas, this "research" would necessarily draw them to the people best able to get their information out there and those people would almost always be the best funded so.........meh

Same Same

quote:

I refused to vote for McCain or Romney.

I think McCain was compromised. I think he may have been compromised his entire political career. Romney on the other hand is a classic case of wanting the "in" people to like him too much. Mostly because regardless of his politics, he's just more comfrortable around a bunch of DC elite than he is around rank and file Republicans.

In hindsight, we would have regretted a McCain election mightily. Romney, much as I can't stand him now, would have basically been Bush SR.
quote:

So to confirm, you're conceding your comments only makes sense in a pretend world and has no application in any real world/election situation.

Again, the fact that I had to even attempt to simplify it for you is an indication of your own ignorance. I can't fix that.
quote:

My vote will decide the winner. So now explain how it's a wasted vote??
Well, if your state problem is, "this system produces too much shitty", seems to me that any vote that tends to ensure the MOST shitty result counts as a throw away.

Or, maybe you want the most shitty result?