Started By
Message

re: If people start having serious long term side effects from the vaccine

Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by OGM
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2020
460 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:01 pm to
Well being that neurological and autoimmune disorders can take years to diagnose, yeah there is going to be an increase in known disabling health issues resulting from the vaccine.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24756 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

This article was published in 1999 - have you ever heard of a link between vaccines and diabetes?


that is precisely the point of my OP. If there are long term side effects, how will we know? Can we rely on the government to be up front with us on that?

I think we all know the answer to that question...

This is a vaccine that changes your immune system. I just got done talking to one of my work colleagues who is an Indian guy who lives in Canada. He took the vaccine because he wanted to go visit his family in India, and the Canadiens were giving him all kinds of grief about getting back into the country if he wasn't vaccinated. He just found out that is thyroid has doubled in size - he had it tested because he began having problems with his voice after getting the vaccine. NOBODY will tell him that it has anything to do with the jab, but in his heart of heart, he knows... His treatment options are to have the gland removed or leave it as is and have it tested every 6 months or so.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

ticle in the British Medical Journal by an infectious disease specialist titled "Public should be told that vaccines may have long term adverse effects"

It's based on a study of influenza vaccination in infants & toddlers and later development of diabetes in those children


This study links HiB vaccines to T1 diabetes, not influenza vaccines. HiB is Haemophilus influenzae type B, not the viral influenza, which wasn't made clear by the reference to 'influenza' vaccination. Also one of the source articles they use references chicken pox infection rather than HiB vaccination as a possible cause of an increase in childhood diabetes, but I haven't read the full article reference because it is behind a paywall.
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
2300 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:39 pm to
Correct, I should have clarified that but I hate spelling "Haemophilus"

HiB is a bacterial infection that can cause things like meningitis, not viral flu.

Still, the point I was making is that this vaccine is still recommended by the CDC for all children under 2 and I have never heard mention of any long term link to diabetes. And the overall point of my post was that it is much more difficult to draw a clear link between a vaccine and long term adverse events as there are so many other potential causes in those intervening years that a vaccine becomes a needle in a haystack.

That link becomes even more difficult to find when there is a very small control group of people who have not received a particular vaccine. It doesn't mean there isn't (or that there is) a link, it's just that it becomes much more difficult to rule out other factors.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24756 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

While I suppose there is some non-zero chance there will be some long term negative side effects of the mRNA vaccines, my feeling (non-expert) is that such effects will not happen or will be rare and/or minor when they do.


That is your opinion. Many people want to wait a while before rolling the dice. We should respect their opinion, as well.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24756 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:51 pm to
quote:


So many people on this board are not acting like long term adverse effects are inevitable? Or is that you are trying to claim I have set it is not possible for there to be long term effects?


This is a perfect example why we shouldn't force anyone to take the vaccine.

Most people believe the truth will be in between the two positions you posted. Severe side effects aren't inevitable for most people, nor is there zero risk. We don't know. It's okay to hold off a bit before deciding.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Still, the point I was making is that this vaccine is still recommended by the CDC for all children under 2 and I have never heard mention of any long term link to diabetes.


Because follow-up studies didn't show any clear association, I believe. One was done in 2011, if I recall, and one in 2004 that appeared in NEJM.

There's risks to any treatment protocol, but people are awfully sure of autoimmune squealae of vaccination despite not understanding that each has a distinct pathophysiology. Without direct links between the cause and effect in distinctly molecular and physiological terms, I'm skeptical of any major links between vaccination and autoimmune disorders such that vaccination itself would lead to an increase in rates of AI disorders at higher than expected proportions.
Posted by kennypowers
AR
Member since Mar 2009
509 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Are the Covid vaccines single use? We will never have boosters? Every jab is an opportunity for a vaccine injury.


Again, you're comparing two things that aren't like each other. A once a year booster shot isn't like taking a pill 365 times.

quote:

Is there a cumulative effect? We won't know for years. That doesn't even take into effect the possibility for auto-immune diseases. The deadliest auto-immune diseases kill you very slowly and/or curtail your quality of life. That will never make it on a VAERS report. Someone who dies at sixty after their bones and intestines basically dissolve over many years is not going to be associated with a vaccine from 40 years before.


You're reaching a bit here. Do you drink any type of carbonated beverage, or alcohol, or smoke anything? There are most likely things that are in your drinking water or the air you breathe that are bad for you too.

quote:

To answer the last and next-to-last questions, we knew early on that this virus was much more deadly for certain people and more like influenza for the vast majority of people. Knowing that, should we have shut everything down, like we did? We should not have put millions of people out of work, IMO. We should have put all of the resources towards protecting those who were most vulnerable.


I don't think we really knew that early on. You're looking at the past with the benefit of the knowledge we've collected over the past 18 months.
Posted by BillRose
Texas
Member since Jun 2021
989 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:05 pm to
So what site accepts reports of vaccine injuries that is not voluntary? Where did your figures come from? Remember the CDC and the FDA cannot be trusted so legitimate links only.
Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
451 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Without direct links between the cause and effect in distinctly molecular and physiological terms, I'm skeptical of any major links between vaccination and autoimmune disorders


It's always interesting to hear your insights and explanations.

Wondering if you believe there are ever times where research is not funded to answer a question for which there is no desire to learn the answer? I remember reading a published piece about SV-40 and a cancer connection from polio vaccine contamination in which the author stated that more research was needed but funding was lacking because it was controversial.

Would also love to know your thoughts on Geert Vanden Bossche and his theories on mass vaccinations.

Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
451 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Again, you're comparing two things that aren't like each other. A once a year booster shot isn't like taking a pill 365 times.


You're right it is nothing alike. A vaccine changes how your immune system functions. That is a big deal. If you start a medicine that has a bad side effect, you simply stop taking it. There is no undoing a vaccine. Can you see it from that point of view?
Posted by Brass Ring
Member since Sep 2021
50 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Let's say that 2, 3, or 4 years down the road, vaccinated people start having a sharp increase in cancer, neurological disorders, auto-immune disorders, strokes/heart attacks, and other fatal or crippling health issues, will our government admit they made a mistake?



Hell no! They will somehow blame the unvaxxed.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24756 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Again, you're comparing two things that aren't like each other. A once a year booster shot isn't like taking a pill 365 times.


You're right. Most drugs are designed to be flushed from your system within a matter of hours. If I find out that the drug I am currently taking is causing adverse side effects in some people, I can stop taking it - hopefully before permanent damage is done. The vaccine stays with you for years, if not a lifetime. I can't reverse it. What is the long term effe t to my immune system? Who knows? I can say this: If someone finds a correlation between these vaccines and AI diseases, they will be absolutely destroyed.

ETA: idsrdum has made this same point better than I did.

quote:

You're reaching a bit here. Do you drink any type of carbonated beverage, or alcohol, or smoke anything? There are most likely things that are in your drinking water or the air you breathe that are bad for you too.


Yes, and I eat and drink things that are probably bad for me. Nobody is forcing me to do that. Its my choice.

quote:


I don't think we really knew that early on. You're looking at the past with the benefit of the knowledge we've collected over the past 18 months.


We knew that very early on. The first major deadly outbreaks were in nursing homes. You can find articles going back to March of 2020 stating that the vast majority of deaths were over the age of 65

We also knew that people had asymptomatic cases very early in the game.
This post was edited on 9/28/21 at 2:41 pm
Posted by OGM
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2020
460 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

There's risks to any treatment protocol, but people are awfully sure of autoimmune squealae of vaccination despite not understanding that each has a distinct pathophysiology. Without direct links between the cause and effect in distinctly molecular and physiological terms, I'm skeptical of any major links between vaccination and autoimmune disorders such that vaccination itself would lead to an increase in rates of AI disorders at higher than expected proportions.


I understand being skeptical of any links not clearly identified, but how could you not also be skeptical of there being no possibility of vaccination triggering this type of immune response?

Science cannot yet explain the causes of autoimmune and neurological disease in distinctly molecular and physiological terms nor can they be directly tested for. It has been proven that there is a link between the 2009 Pandemrix vaccine and Narcolepsy, but they can't exactly identify why. So how can you be so certain that something similar could not possibly be happening with covid vaccines?

Mechanisms of vaccine-associated narcolepsy
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
7945 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

vaccine manufacturers

I think its funny the vaccine manufacturers think they won't get screwed by democrats by passing a law making them liable retroactively if the heat gets too hot for the politicians.

We'll be seeing commercials from Sokolov Law with 100% Free legal consultations for years.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Wondering if you believe there are ever times where research is not funded to answer a question for which there is no desire to learn the answer?



Incentives go both ways. People want to research things that could set their careers. That can lead to a lot of pointless research too.

quote:

I remember reading a published piece about SV-40 and a cancer connection from polio vaccine contamination in which the author stated that more research was needed but funding was lacking because it was controversial.


A quick literature search shows me there are over 6000 results with those keywords, so I'm again skeptical. But I don't know anything about this, so it might be true.

quote:

Would also love to know your thoughts on Geert Vanden Bossche and his theories on mass vaccinations.



Just did a quick overview, and his notion that 'leaky' vaccines will breed highly infectious variants can't just be limited to vaccines, if that makes sense. The risk of infectious variants will exist with even wild-type virus, because of the morphological characteristics of the virus itself.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Science cannot yet explain the causes of autoimmune


This isn't exactly true. We know quite a lot about it. Every human has autoreactive lymphocytes. We know there are two ways AI disease can develop, through failure to develop tolerance to self-antigens, and dysregulation of some part of the immune system that leads to loss of tolerance. We know that infectious agents can cause aberrant activation of tissue antigen-presenting cells which cause T-cell auto-reactivity, and there are several features of pathogen evasion, from molecular mimicry to superantigen activation, that provoke auto-reactive responses. We also know what genes are linked to autoimmune disease, and what HLA alleles are linked to autoimmune disease. We can even test for autoantibodies that are fairly specific for certain diseases. Suggesting that the adverse effects of vaccines will modulate an autoimmune route, as though it couldn't possibly modulate disease pathophysiology, is frankly a little weird.

quote:

t has been proven that there is a link between the 2009 Pandemrix vaccine and Narcolepsy, but they can't exactly identify why.


This link says otherwise? LINK

I will read your link later, but the writing style of the author is pretty annoying. I don't think they are a scientist writing for other scientists, looking at their publication record.

quote:

So how can you be so certain that something similar could not possibly be happening with covid vaccines?


Firstly, I'm just extremely skeptical that the long-term effects of the vaccine would be distinctly different from the long-term effects of natural infection. Secondly, the association with vaccines and long-term disease rarely ever plays out, and this has happened time and again, with every new vaccine. People don't remember the panic with the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in the 80s, but the accusations were similar. And vaccines with high injury rates tended to produce injury fairly quickly following injection. The notion that they will absolutely produce long-term effects at rates higher than they would exist in controls, as a surety, is something that has been offered as a caveat for vaccines before, and it really hasn't been proven to be the case.


Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

The vaccine stays with you for years, if not a lifetime. I can't reverse it. What is the long term effe t to my immune system? Who knows? I can say this: If someone finds a correlation between these vaccines and AI diseases, they will be absolutely destroyed.


But don't people see that this is directly asking why natural infection, a process which vaccination emulates, would not produce AI disease as well? And the vaccine elicits a process your body undergoes all the time. You produce 2 to 3 grams of antibodies every day, as you are always exposed to antigenic material all the time. Why vaccines can elicit something that the virus it protects against cannot is a very wild suggestion on its face.
Posted by Daequalizer
Member since Aug 2021
1310 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 4:54 pm to
Democrat playbook: Shift the blame
Posted by obdobd918
Member since Jun 2020
3228 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

will our government admit they made a mistake? Is there any chance this will happen? Or will our government and the vaccine manufacturers deny, deny, deny, and call it a conspiracy theory?


This is why some people have opted out of the vax. The vax focuses on providing protection from covid only while allowing the body's immune system to ignore other diseases it needs to fight. Pick your disease.
There have been experts that discuss this. Only long-term dats will determine if this is true or not. There are claims that some people had diseases in remission, took the vax only for the disease to return. Can one conclude that the vax caused it? There is about as much evidence that the vax caused it as the vax did not. It is unknown, so who wants to take the chance?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram