- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If He Needs to, Can Obama Successfully Claim "Presidential Immunity" For His Crimes?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:38 pm to SDVTiger
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:38 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
All he needs is the law offices of SFP, Boosie and Cwill and nothing will happen when youbhave that power team on yourside
8 years in and you guys are still collecting scalps on the wall
Kevin Clinesmith
2
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Thats one way to deflect racist boosie
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:40 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:I agree. Trump would not be making prejudicial public statements if any prosecution was planned.
It’s a moot point because no one is getting indicted. Not just Obama, I can guarantee not a single indictment will be made. Bookmark this post.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:40 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That’s what I thought. Thank you for admitting you believed the editorialized version you read.
TF are you talking about? I have been saying this entire thread that no report ever claimed vote manipulation but there was election interference
This literally proves my point. Gabbard’s big claim is “votes weren’t manipulated”, yet this is bluntly stated in both the Mueller report and in the senate review from fricking 2019 [SECTION I: Table of contents item VI]
Again, you’re being a disingenuous POS & attempting gotchas. Or a moron. Not sure.
Now go read the section on Manafort (in volume 5) & the section on infrastructure/cybersecurity (in volume 4)
The entire Republican majority committee unanimously signed off on this report. You want me to hold your hand? Do you need me to re-link it for you? You want me to directly quote the entire fricking report here?
Get off your arse & make an effort or admit you’re a hypocrite who hasn’t read more than a headline in the last 10 years + gets their news from Twitter.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:45 pm to KCT
quote:
If He Needs to, Can Obama Successfully Claim "Presidential Immunity" For His Crimes?
Not going to find out. The WH is dragging out some Obama bullshite because their base is obsessed with a man who has been out of any office for almost a decade. They’re hoping to get you off Epstein.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:50 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
They’re hoping to get you off Epstein
This, and it is so obviously to most everyone. And yet 90+% of the MAGA on this board have fallen for it hook, line, and sinker
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:52 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:Seeing your join date we know you were here in the months following the 2020 election. For damn near six months almost every other thread was claiming proof that vote totals were actively changed. Remember that shootout between the CIA and Delta Force over the secret server in Italy that controlled the numbers? Krakens? That Pulitzer guy who lied about inventing QR codes? The MyPillow guy? Please. Don't be dishonest.
TF are you talking about? I have been saying this entire thread that no report ever claimed vote manipulation but there was election interference
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:53 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
he’s not going to read that. No one here will
Dude got owned posting editorialized interpretations of those reports. And you try to mock me? Try harder bro. There is a a certain way to type PhD as well.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:53 pm to 94LSU
quote:
Seeing your join date we know you were here in the months following the 2020 election.
We’re talking about 2016. The senate intelligence review is regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election lol.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
8 years in and you guys are still collecting scalps on the wall
The irony in a thread where you have posted what you posted.
beautiful. 
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:57 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
TF are you talking about? I have been saying this entire thread that no report ever claimed vote manipulation but there was election interference
Non responsive. Please link me to the page and paragraph where you learned of the specific tactics used by Russians to influence the election. Again…don’t be scared to be very specific. Prove you weren’t just parroting an editorialized version.
quote:
The entire Republican majority committee unanimously signed off on this report
Name the republicans and how many votes? You dumb frick. You want context except when it comes to Russians and Facebook ads.
quote:
Get off your arse & make an effort or admit you’re a hypocrite who hasn’t read more than a headline in the last 10 years + gets their news from Twitter.
I don’t let reporters tell me my news. You dumb frick. You do.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:57 pm to BBONDS25
I literally posted 5 different verifiable quotes from named individuals or implicating named entities & then the actual report.
You are claiming, with no evidence whatsoever that Russia didn’t target US elections in 2016.
I’ve answered every ridiculous demand, now you can go read the infrastructure section from volume 4 & the Manafort section from volume 5 or at least make a cogent argument lmao.
There’s a fricking table of contents dude. The link is not non-responsive and anyone else can verify by clicking it.
You are claiming, with no evidence whatsoever that Russia didn’t target US elections in 2016.
I’ve answered every ridiculous demand, now you can go read the infrastructure section from volume 4 & the Manafort section from volume 5 or at least make a cogent argument lmao.
There’s a fricking table of contents dude. The link is not non-responsive and anyone else can verify by clicking it.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 6:58 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
This, and it is so obviously to most everyone. And yet 90+% of the MAGA on this board have fallen for it hook, line, and sinker
You not aware Trump asked Bondi to unseal the GJ testimony? How embarrassing for you.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:00 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Name the republicans and how many votes? You dumb frick.
You’re a lazy sonofabitch aren’t you?
Do you employ this tactic in every argument?
I feel horrible for your wife.
quote:
I don’t let reporters tell me my news.
Just Twitter huh?
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:10 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
You’re a lazy sonofabitch aren’t you? Do you employ this tactic in every argument? I feel horrible for your wife.
Asking for citations and specifics is the standard of every single legal jurisdiction in this entire country. Your ignorance to that fact and the hilarious fact you attempt to mock me over employing the standard to your ridiculous posts speak for itself. You’re a complete moron. I feel sorry for you.
Why don’t you give us the link to the reporter you cited on here? Embarrassed? You should be.
quote:
Just Twitter huh?
Nope. The source documents. You know the one you mock me for asking you to cite.
fricking moron. This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:12 pm to BBONDS25
There. Is. A. Table. Of. Contents.
Volume 5: Manafort
Volume 4: Infrastructure
This is not difficult.
Also, you just going to ignore the fact that your “breaking news” was public knowledge & part of this 4 year old report?
Volume 5: Manafort
Volume 4: Infrastructure
This is not difficult.
Also, you just going to ignore the fact that your “breaking news” was public knowledge & part of this 4 year old report?
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:16 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
There. Is. A. Table. Of. Contents.
Is that what you think happens when you present an argument to court. You submit the entire document without further reference? No. You dumbass. Cite the page and paragraph. Your clear inability to do so shows that you relied upon an editorialized version. Why are you so hesitant to let us know which reporter you’re believing? fricking idiot.
quote:
This is not difficult.
Appears to be VERY difficult for you. But, then again, you’re a useful idiot.
quote:
Also, you just going to ignore the fact that your “breaking news” was public knowledge & part of this 4 year old report?
Which part. Again…I know you struggle with it. Be specific. And also tell us how it matters when it was known. TIA.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:29 pm to BBONDS25
Since you cannot use a table of contents, here’s some sections from Manafort:
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
Since you cannot read, re-stating this quote:
I can do this all day. You’re still dying on a tweet hill.
[/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] [/url] Since you cannot read, re-stating this quote:
quote:
In an exclusive interview with NBC News, Jeanette Manfra, the head of cybersecurity at the Department of Homeland Security, said she couldn't talk about classified information publicly, but in 2016, "We saw a targeting of 21 states and an exceptionally small number of them were actually successfully penetrated. We were able to determine that the scanning and probing of voter registration databases was coming from the Russian government."
I can do this all day. You’re still dying on a tweet hill.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:31 pm to DeathByTossDive225
The vast majority of what You posted is. about election interference in Ukraine, you dumb frick. you can’t even read your own links. Pathetic.
Now tell us which journalist you’re copy and pasting from?
And nobody still believes this. not even the most hardcore leftists. Jesus. You really are a parrot if talking points, aren’t you. Are you not aware of when this report was made? frick. You are so confident in your complete ignorance.
you can’t even read your own links. Pathetic. Now tell us which journalist you’re copy and pasting from?
quote:
We saw a targeting of 21 states and an exceptionally small number of them were actually successfully penetrated. We were able to determine that the scanning and probing of voter registration databases was coming from the Russian government."
And nobody still believes this.
not even the most hardcore leftists. Jesus. You really are a parrot if talking points, aren’t you. Are you not aware of when this report was made? frick. You are so confident in your complete ignorance. This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 7/21/25 at 7:34 pm to KCT
Trump should pardon him tomorrow. Would drive democrats crazy.
We all know nothing is happening to BHO.
We all know nothing is happening to BHO.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News