Started By
Message

re: I mean four years of open borders We should have expected these terror attacks right?

Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

It's 100% what you do to others.

This is not true

quote:

You have been said open borders had absolutely nothing to do with the terrorist act

That is not what I have said, on this page of this thread, even

quote:

If, in the future, we find out the border was a variable, then I will be discussing those facts. Maintaining logic and honest analysis now does not preclude that future discussion (which is something I imagine lots of people have issues with or emotional reactions to)


You seem to be having the rhetorical issue of assuming that waiting for facts precludes future discussion of new facts.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14280 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

All the facts are not released



Lack of evidence is not evidence of a conspiracy.

Nor is it evidence of it NOT being a conspiracy
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
20919 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

And it's also falsely stating my position.

Well, what is your position?

Have you been arguing, "we don't know whether or not the open border is an element of this attack" ... or ... have you been arguing, "the open border is not an element of this attack" - because one of those things would be true and the other is not.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
32984 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

This is completely incorrect, but feel free to post your typical dishonesty.


As a generalization, this board abandoned collective intellectual honesty, curiosity, and ideological consistency a long, long time ago.

I don't know what you expect to get, but you're wasting your time.
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
1878 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:33 pm to
Happened in New York in 2017 as well. Trump’s border policy was just as effective
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14280 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

It's 100% what you do to others.


This is not true


You do know your answer is a lie.

Now where is your evidence to back your statements OR do you agree it's just your opinion
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Well, what is your position?


There is absolutely nothing that any of us know that links this act to the border, therefore it is not logical to bring the border into any discussion based around the terrorist acts of today. People are jumping to conclusions, even after being made to look completely retarded earlier, base don emotionally-fueled hopium.

And, as I said earlier:

quote:

If, in the future, we find out the border was a variable, then I will be discussing those facts. Maintaining logic and honest analysis now does not preclude that future discussion (which is something I imagine lots of people have issues with or emotional reactions to)


Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14280 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:37 pm to
Sfp where is your evidence. You demand it from others now it's your turn. Do you have indisputable evidence or are you just giving your opinion
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
15023 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

believe in the 1st Amendment. If you disagree, state your hatred of our Constitution clearly.


I sure do, you talking out of both sides of your mouth now. Just like a fricking leftist it’s the left that is supressing free speech so don’t gimme that shite

You’re full of shite dude!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

You demand it from others now it's your turn.


The evidence that there is no evidence that links the border to this terrorist act?

You're asking me to prove something that literally does not exist at this moment
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
21388 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:40 pm to
It’s logical because it’s the fricking title of the thread you dense pos.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14280 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

You're asking me to prove something that literally does not exist at this moment ?


Exactly. So you telling people they are wrong is fully your opinion and not based on any evidence.

Thank you. You played yourself.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

It’s logical because it’s the fricking title of the thread


Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
20919 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

There is absolutely nothing that any of us know that links this act to the border, therefore it is not logical to bring the border into any discussion based around the terrorist acts of today. People are jumping to conclusions, even after being made to look completely retarded earlier, base don emotionally-fueled hopium.

This is weak AF.

It's pretty f'n normal and not illogical to throw the open border onto the pile of things to discuss in relation to this attack. Throw it on the pile like it's a proven fact? - you are correct, that's illogical. But so is arguing that the open border isn't involved like that's a proven fact.

Tell me, before we learned about the flag or had confirmation from the authorities, was it "illogical" to consider the attack involved a jihadist?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

So you telling people they are wrong is fully your opinion and not based on any evidence.



No. If they're telling me that I'm wrong, then they have to show this evidence that does not currently exist.

That's how logic and evidence work.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
39632 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


This “guy” spent a full calendar year
talking about “Project 2025” and how dangerous it was. 2025 hits and it’s the Muslims again.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452474 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Tell me, before we learned about the flag or had confirmation from the authorities, was it "illogical" to consider the attack involved a jihadist?

No, because we literally have examples and precedents from which to refer for that.

We don't have the opposite. Only hopium, emotions, and dishonesty exist on that particular spectrum at this point.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
21388 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:44 pm to
Yes it is dumbass you’re the only one steering the narrative.
Posted by 5WFSHR
Montgomery, AL
Member since Apr 2024
1879 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:45 pm to
Open borders MUST GO
Muslims MUST GO
DEI MUST GO
It’s all of the LEFT.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14280 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

If they're telling me that I'm wrong, then they have to show this evidence that does not currently exist.


Yet you can say that open borders had nothing to do with this act of terrorism without any evidence to support you. Your narcissistic personality is coming through loud and clear
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram