- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I know many of you hate Loomer but her latest scoop may have ended the NYC civil trial.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:42 am to Ribbed
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:42 am to Ribbed
quote:
Agan, no one thought so with Judge Thomas' wife.
I’m citing the New York judicial code. I realize you’re moving the goalposts, but why would New Yorks judicial code have anything to do with Thomas?
Also, when did Ginny Thomas make a statement about a party during a time her husband was hearing a case involving that party?
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 10:45 am
1
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:44 am to Ribbed
It’s pretty obvious from your comments you’re not married.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:45 am to SPT
It’s HHTM. He literally wanted to blow Rubio.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:45 am to SPT
A lot of things are obvious from his comments.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:46 am to lsuguy84
quote:
It’s HHTM. He literally wanted to blow Rubio.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:49 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I’m citing the New York judicial code. I realize you’re moving the goalposts, but why would New Yorks judicial code have anything to do with Thomas?
It doesn't. But when the Thomas stuff came out everyone now saying this is definitely bias stated there ws no bias. That her opinion didn't imply his.
Besides, as has been poined out multiple times, there is a plethora of reasons to demonstrate bias and get this case thrown out. Why hasn't it been? You really think those same people are going to find this a bridge too far?
It is also my theory that they want to lose this case. Who in their right minds in Washigton or New York wants this precedent? Their goal is not to convict Trump but to bleed him dry.
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 10:57 am
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:54 am to lsuguy84
quote:
It’s HHTM. He literally wanted to blow Rubio.
Daaaaaamn.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:54 am to Ribbed
quote:
The relevant question is can you prove it?
Yes, the fricking guy said in open court that he didn’t care what the Defendant had to say.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:55 am to Chet Donnely
quote:
Yes, the fricking guy said in open court that he didn’t care what the Defendant had to say.
Lol. Well, off topic, but go for it.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:57 am to Ribbed
quote:
Just for the record, do you think this judge is interested in a fair trial in this case? The relevant question is can you prove it?
Looks directly on your topic.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:58 am to Ribbed
quote:
He will not be welcome in his own home unless he convicts I meant legally, which is the only standard I care about in this discussion.
Would you believe that he and his wife likely discuss their politics and feeling about said politics. The answer is obviously yes as she’s demonstrated a public display of bias which we can reasonably assume is as or probably worse in her own home.. A home she shares with the presiding judge.. the mere fact that her open bias is on display without thought shows the level of irrational behavior the judge surrounds himself with in his own home
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:00 am to GumboPot
None of the hack judges and lawyers who are pursuing Trump need to be exposed, they've been exposing themselves for the past 7 years. There's not an honest person who doesn't know the lawfare against Trump is 100% political. My lord, the hack NY AG ran her whole campaign on getting Trump. 
This post was edited on 11/11/23 at 8:16 am
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:04 am to Chet Donnely
quote:
Looks directly on your topic.
Well, we were talking about the family's politics, not his statements, but if you think that works, go for it.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:05 am to TROLA
And, historically, pressures at home have caused some very stupid decision making.
Roe v Wade was decided in a manner well outside the court’s purview by instituting a framework for abortion being legalized based on trimesters and so forth instead of ruling on the constitutionality of the law in question.
The Justice who wrote it did so because his wife and daughters got in his ear on the subject.
Roe v Wade was decided in a manner well outside the court’s purview by instituting a framework for abortion being legalized based on trimesters and so forth instead of ruling on the constitutionality of the law in question.
The Justice who wrote it did so because his wife and daughters got in his ear on the subject.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:05 am to TROLA
quote:
Would you believe that he and his wife likely discuss their politics and feeling about said politics.
Possible. Not proven. I have had jobs that require me to maintain discretion with my wife and limit her access to work information. I do. Bcause ethics are important to me.
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 11:07 am
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:10 am to BBONDS25
quote:What proof do you have that the judge's wife even has a twitter account?
You are denying the judge’s wife posted what she posted?
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 11:12 am
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:10 am to teke184
quote:
The Justice who wrote it did so because his wife and daughters got in his ear on the subject.
This immediately resulted in the case being thrown out or overturned, right?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:11 am to Ribbed
quote:
Bcause ethics are important to me.
And that there is the problem with your argument. You assume and believe everyone feels the same as you
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:13 am to GumboPot
you think this will stop them? lol
Posted on 11/10/23 at 11:14 am to Ribbed
It was 60+ years ago and times were very different, partially in that they did it behind the scenes and his mindset with regards to the case wasn’t examined at the time he made the decision.
It was also the Burger court, IIRC, so they were doing all kinds of expansive shite with little regard for the Constitution much like the Warren court before them.
It was also the Burger court, IIRC, so they were doing all kinds of expansive shite with little regard for the Constitution much like the Warren court before them.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News