Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

I have to give Groomer congress member Sharice Davids props for her political ads..

Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46151 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:01 pm
Davids is the lesbian Indigenous woman who duped the KS brain dead fools in 2018 and again during the 2020 GE to keep her in congress. It's reported by her 2022 republican opponent for congress Amanda Atkins that Davids voted with Whispering Joe 100% of the time. She was also instrumental with help from Groomer Governor Laura Kelly in keeping unfettered abortion available in KS during a special election this past August.

Here's where I'm infuriated and at the same time impressed by both of these deceptive women. Both are currently running political ads and if you didn't know who they were you would swear by their political ads they were likely centrist republicans. Both fraudsters are running ads heavily themed in bringing back American jobs, strengthening the US economy and helping the elderly who are living on fixed incomes. There's no mention of a women's right for abortion, transgender rights, open borders, green energy, DIE (Diversity, Inclusion, Equity) ...no they're not going to pimp the shite they really care about because they understand it's not that popular. If you want to know the truth you have to look at their actions and the policies they support and Davids would have a difficult time hiding her record of voting lock step with Whispering Joe's wishes.

The other thing I've noticed is the ratio of political ads, Groomer vs Republican. In the KC market the KS Groomers are running 4 political ads to every 1 of their republican opponent. It was even worse than that during the special election this past August when the abortion issue was on the ballot, the political ads for unfettered abortion was at least 5 to 1 against the pro life efforts.

Is it like this^^^^ in other parts of the country? And if it is, where are the Groomers getting all of this damn money to spend on their political blitzkrieg for television ads?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28931 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

Is it like this^^^^ in other parts of the country?


There are a ton of democrats in Texas who’s ads are entirely bring jobs and support schools. No mention of party. Republicans usually add “conservative” on their signs.

A portion of Wendy Davis’ (abortion Barbie) constituents didn’t know she was democrat until they showed up to vote for her because she didn’t campaign as a democrat.
This post was edited on 9/11/22 at 8:17 pm
Posted by Shotgun Willie
Member since Apr 2016
3781 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:23 pm to
I’m really surprised at the amount of liberals here in KC
Posted by Mellow Drama
Flyover Country
Member since Aug 2020
3996 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Is it like this^^^^ in other parts of the country? And if it is, where are the Groomers getting all of this damn money to spend on their political blitzkrieg for television ads?



I'm far away from Colorado and I get youtube ads for that Polis guy. Where he sounds moderate and tolerant.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19309 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Is it like this^^^^ in other parts of the country? And if it is, where are the Groomers getting all of this damn money to spend on their political blitzkrieg for television ads?




Yes. Bobby Frank Beto and the Groomers get lots of California and New York $.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68318 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:36 pm to
The corporations, soros, etc are dumping record number of cash into these midterms. More than most presidential years.

They control congress for 2 more years, it's over and they know it
Posted by AUTiger1978
Member since Jan 2018
889 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:43 pm to
I am getting Laura Kelley(D) ads at least 50:1 vs. Derek Schmidt. And it’s always the same as linking Schmidt to Brownback, which, unfortunately is pretty effective with moderates.

In the house race I do see an occasional ad for David’s and you’re right, they are deceptive. I have not seen a single tv ad for Adkins. Not sure how it’s even possible within a few months of the election, especially since the only poll is pretty close.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8867 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:46 pm to
We live in a stupid country. Why on earth is it legal for these candidates running in local elections, to be able to receive out of state funding? And in many cases, out of America funding. I am not sure at what point this was made legal, but it is just one more reason our country is a joke, and basically a banana republic.
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
2608 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 8:48 pm to
I no shite just had a friend return from the Central Valley //Napa area vacation
He talked to locals and they felt the population would be 1/3 within 5 years
These farmers will be eliminated for climate change
He is a straight up left/prog and said this is why Texas would flip
It boggles my mind
Celebrating spreading destruction
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46151 posts
Posted on 9/11/22 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

There are a ton of democrats in Texas who’s ads are entirely bring jobs and support schools. No mention of party. Republicans usually add “conservative” on their signs.

A portion of Wendy Davis’ (abortion Barbie) constituents didn’t know she was democrat until they showed up to vote for her because she didn’t campaign as a democrat.


Many Groomer politicians don't want to bring attention to their party affiliation.....I guess it works. Why would any politician run ads that omit their party affiliation? I wonder?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram