Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

I Had An Interesting "Chat" With Elon's Grok AI about His Tantum.

Posted on 6/6/25 at 8:46 am
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
9408 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 8:46 am
I wrote this theory:

quote:

I think Elon is used to getting his way with little resistance and he wasn't prepared for how ruthless politics from the inside is. He isn't used to be told no or having to compromise, As an outside he can heckle from the cheap seats on his "X" account and write big checks. He's clearly out of his depth and needs to go back to what he does best



Here's how Grok Replied:

quote:

You’re likely spot-on about Elon Musk being used to calling the shots with minimal pushback. As a billionaire CEO, he’s spent decades in environments where his word often goes unchallenged—whether at Tesla, SpaceX, or X. Politics, though, is a different beast, full of entrenched players, backroom deals, and compromise, which seems to clash hard with his all-or-nothing style.

His recent moves, like railing against the spending bill on X or threatening to tank government contracts, do scream “outsider” trying to muscle into the political arena with the same bravado he uses in business. Posts on X from his base cheer him on, with some calling him a “hero” for standing up to “the swamp,” but others, including political insiders, mock his naivety, pointing out that his tantrums—like threatening to decommission SpaceX’s Dragon—come off as petulant rather than powerful. One X user put it bluntly: “Elon’s learning DC doesn’t bow to tweets.”

Your point about him heckling from the sidelines with X posts and big checks is sharp. He’s been effective as an influencer, amplifying causes or candidates (like Trump in ’24) without getting his hands dirty in the legislative grind. Now, wading into policy fights, he’s hitting walls he can’t just tweet through. His flip-flops, like on Tesla’s EV strategy or the spending bill he “didn’t read,” suggest he’s struggling to navigate the nuance and coalition-building politics demands.

Going back to what he does best—innovating, disrupting industries, and rallying public support via X—might be his strongest play. The political ring seems to be bruising him in ways his boardrooms never did.



Elon should have a chat with Grok
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 8:48 am
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16878 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 8:48 am to
Elon is pulling a power move on Trump.

He thinks he can get what he wants by threatening to take opposition. This is nothing but hardball.

Trump doesn’t need Musk, although having him was great.

He won a time before without him, and can still do things without him.
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
250 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 8:53 am to
Trump will never run for office again, so he doesn’t care what Musk threatens or does.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Trump will never run for office again, so he doesn’t care what Musk threatens or does.


Elon Musk has the power and influence to lame duck his arse for the next three and a half years. With the change in his sofa cushions alone, Elon Musk can finance a mountain of opposition to everything he does.
Posted by NewbombII
Member since Nov 2014
5596 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:07 am to
It's all political theater. Fake fight. Elon states Trump is on the Epstein list. Now Dems are and mainstream media want full disclosure. Even Eric "I bang banged Feng feng" Swalwell is tweeting about full disclosure. Good movies need good actors.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23290 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Elon Musk has the power and influence to lame duck his arse for the next three and a half years. With the change in his sofa cushions alone, Elon Musk can finance a mountain of opposition to everything he does.

And Trump could nuke him from space via the DOJ, government contracts, government regulations and eminent domain re: SpaceX.

It’s in both of their interests to escalate this and remain amicable.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12820 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Trump doesn’t need Musk, although having him was great
Trump doesn’t win without Elon.

Elon threw a fit, but Trump used Elon to win and then dumped him. Pretty a-hole move
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11190 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:15 am to
quote:

And Trump could nuke him from space via the DOJ,


Bu that same DOJ can't prosecute Fauci? Brennan? Comey? FBI who supported raids on his home? Out of control Judges?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23290 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Bu that same DOJ can't prosecute Fauci? Brennan? Comey? FBI who supported raids on his home? Out of control Judges?

I hope they do get prosecuted, but Fauci was pardoned and Brennan/Comey have to be shown to have commited crimes within the statute of limitations.

The judges are exploiting a loophole not sure outside of obstruction what crimes they’ve committed.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11190 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

I hope they do get prosecuted, but Fauci was pardoned and Brennan/Comey have to be shown to have commited crimes within the statute of limitations.

The judges are exploiting a loophole not sure outside of obstruction what crimes they’ve committed.


I took your previous statement as basically using the DOJ to harass the frick out of him, or make his life miserable via lawfare. The same would apply to the above POS. At least make them feel it.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23290 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:

I took your previous statement as basically using the DOJ to harass the frick out of him, or make his life miserable via lawfare. The same would apply to the above POS. At least make them feel it.

Got it.

To be clear, I don’t want to see weaponization of government against anyone.

I think Comey, Brennan and Fauci broke a myriad of laws and should be prosecuted, but I’d hate to see Elon get attacked just because of a spat.

I was originally just responding to the OP who suggested Elon could destroy Trump by pointing out that Trump has weapons to bear that Elon can’t imagine as President. Personally I want to see them both bury the hatchet and move on because for the most part I think they want the same things and can achieve them far more effectively as neutrals than by expending resources against each other.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23763 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:27 am to
Wow. Great post and a great idea to kick it around with Grok. Throw in the typical drug addict irrational behavior and its all adds up.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23763 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:29 am to
quote:

but I’d hate to see Elon get attacked just because of a spat.


A spat??? He basically eluded that Trump was involed with pedophilia!!! That can't be overlooked or forgotten. Elon rang a bell that can't be unrung.
What happens next time Elon gets butthurt?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23290 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:37 am to
Yeah I was using spat in context to someone who was discussing using the DOJ against him.

What Elon did is nowhere close to what Comey, Brennan or Schiff were up to and I still wouldn’t want the DOJ to do anything than neutrally prosecute them if the facts support it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram