- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I don't think she'll show either.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:34 am
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:34 am
This is like somebody trying to demonstrate to the committee that water really does runs uphill. It IS as bizarre as it seems. The Democrats are trying to sell you shite-on-a-shingle by telling you it's caviar on a water cracker.
"In the letter replying to one by Mike Davis, Chief Counsel for Nominations , [Ford's lawyer] implies that Ford is not one hundred percent committed to appear on Thursday, raising serious reservations about the Republican majority’s plan to have a sex crimes prosecutor question Ford, and stating the hearing plan “does not appear designed to provide Dr. Blasey with fair and respectful treatment.” Bromwich also complained that a “number of outstanding questions” about the hearing have not been answered." LINK
She'll invent a reason not to show. Trust me on this.
"In the letter replying to one by Mike Davis, Chief Counsel for Nominations , [Ford's lawyer] implies that Ford is not one hundred percent committed to appear on Thursday, raising serious reservations about the Republican majority’s plan to have a sex crimes prosecutor question Ford, and stating the hearing plan “does not appear designed to provide Dr. Blasey with fair and respectful treatment.” Bromwich also complained that a “number of outstanding questions” about the hearing have not been answered." LINK
She'll invent a reason not to show. Trust me on this.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:36 am to tigerpawl
You may be right. But I’m gonna wait for something a little less hackish than the Gateway Pundit.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 6:39 am
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:37 am to tigerpawl
I got 350 saying she's a no show.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:43 am to tigerpawl
Timing couldn’t be better for her to bail while saying Grassley changed up the game.
Lol@sex crime prosecutor and SHE is having issue with it?? If anyone should take issue, it should be Kav not her dumb arse
Lol@sex crime prosecutor and SHE is having issue with it?? If anyone should take issue, it should be Kav not her dumb arse
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:44 am to tigerpawl
If she can’t get video and quotes of a bunch of republican white men #notbelievingher, there’s no point to a hearing.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:45 am to tigerpawl
Ask yourself this. Why hasn’t she gone to the police and filed a report?? If she really believes he assaulted her and she really wants to stop his appointment, that would be a sure fire way to do it. The fact of the matter is that she is trying to derail his campaign with allegations without fully committing to them from a legal stand point.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:45 am to tigerpawl
If she doesn't show, the dems can play out the whole "scary white men didn't hear the woman speak" narrative. It's obvious now what is happening.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:46 am to tigerpawl
The letter says a “an experienced sex crimes proseccutor is not relevant as we are not trying a criminal case”.
But...
“Please Idemtify this person and ask your staff to send us her resume immediately. We respectfully request to meet with her tomorrow”.
that’s not how this works. They scared.
But...
“Please Idemtify this person and ask your staff to send us her resume immediately. We respectfully request to meet with her tomorrow”.
that’s not how this works. They scared.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 6:46 am
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:46 am to BobBoucher
The FBI should investigate the prosecutor!
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:47 am to Blizzard of Chizz
Don't fool yourself. Grassley, et al, have teeth. They'll make swiss cheese out of her and send a strong message to the hysterical Dems not to pull this crap again.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:57 am to tigerpawl
Oh, she'll show in some fashion. She is being paid and handled by big money, maybe Soros at this point. So she is being prepared and shielded by massive funding. And she likely doesn't get paid if she doesn't co-operate. Soros likely has to be careful though. And the wildcat lawyer is trying to get his cut so he has his crew. The whole thing is a shitshow of immense proportions trying to capitalize on a popular theme of rich white boy frat types and dumbass young women who give in to them because of their money and power. They picked the wrong Judge however. Likely the only virgin young man with a calendar dictating his responsible actions while a youth. Sounds like he had a strong matriarch behind him. We'll see, the dems are desperate and trying for a get it right this time with a second high tech lynching.
Ramirez is even weaker but they had to get backups. The interesting part is the American people. You can figure with polarization and Trump hatred about 50% mouthing the dem party line that he must be guilty is about right. But that leaves about half. Can 5 to 10% of those walking around Americans be that dumb? Well yes, yes they can.
Ramirez is even weaker but they had to get backups. The interesting part is the American people. You can figure with polarization and Trump hatred about 50% mouthing the dem party line that he must be guilty is about right. But that leaves about half. Can 5 to 10% of those walking around Americans be that dumb? Well yes, yes they can.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:00 am to jimdog
Gonna laugh my arse off if Kav says “oh crap, I forgot I had something to do Thursday. Let’s reschedule for Friday instead and Ford can go ahead. So sorry for the late notice!”
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:02 am to tigerpawl
One of the reasons she won’t show is that, shall we say, the years have not been especially kind to Crissy.
It’s gonna be a tough sell to our image-driven society that someone was hot to trot for her. That’s not a rational response to an alleged sex crime especially decades later. It’s also unavoidable. Anita Hill is better looking now than Crissy was.
It’s gonna be a tough sell to our image-driven society that someone was hot to trot for her. That’s not a rational response to an alleged sex crime especially decades later. It’s also unavoidable. Anita Hill is better looking now than Crissy was.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:03 am to tigerpawl
I bet there has been miles of dick in this whore!
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:03 am to tigerpawl
quote:
She'll invent a reason not to show
This is why a good subpoena, served upon crossing into DC, is in order.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:05 am to jimdog
She didn’t bank on Kav having a calendar. She cannot be more specific in her testimony than she has already been. She’s trapped.
I’m still curious who her marital therapist was. She had a counseling business running out of her home that is now closed.
I’m still curious who her marital therapist was. She had a counseling business running out of her home that is now closed.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:19 am to the808bass
Get out of here with the counseling thing. That was just someone she knew or a friend or a BS buddy.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 7:31 am to Hangit
quote:
This is why a good subpoena, served upon crossing into DC, is in order.
Forget a subpoena. The committee has bent over backwards for her. If she doesn't show at the last minute, that will be the biggest indictment of her yet.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News