- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How much should a Supreme Court Justice's Salary Be?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 5:54 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 1/31/17 at 5:54 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Seems low, but it is a guaranteed lifetime job. That's a huge perk.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 5:55 pm to Pax Regis
quote:In one sense, yes. Their responsibilities and reach and budgets are vast. But the fact that you could strip the salaries away altogether and still have people lining up to spend $500m to get the job suggests otherwise.
President should be $1,000,000 easily.
Those positions are underpaid. Crazy I know but true.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:06 pm to Navytiger74
quote:I don't really think this is entirely true.
In one sense, yes. Their responsibilities and reach and budgets are vast. But the fact that you could strip the salaries away altogether and still have people lining up to spend $500m to get the job suggests otherwise.
I mean, yes, you get people lining up for the job. But, are you getting the RIGHT people lining up for it? For regular jobs, there are TWO factors to whether a Salary is the right one. 1)Does it attract candidates for the job and 2)Are they GOOD candidates.
I've talked about the salary problem for congress and the President for probably 15 years. To paraphrase a longer argument.
Imagine you weren't electing people for those jobs. Instead, imagine you were running job listings for them. What knowledge skills and abilities would you hope the applicants have? I know that when I think about the KSAs, it's a damned impressive list that I'd like to see and a ridiculously diverse skill set.
Oh, but now imagine that in your job listing, on top of that, you wrote the caveat. "Oh, and if you apply, everyone in your family is fair game to have their lives turned inside out going back as far as the eye can see. If your husband got a DUI 30 years ago, THAT will be news. If your daughters party like normal college kids, THAT will be news. People will call your kids ugly, people will drag your sister, mother, father, uncle, and even long time friends through the mud. All for the salary of $XXXX.
I will submit to you that we have a LOT of people in this country who COMFORTABLY meet the skill set you'd write. Unfortunately, most of those people make MORE than the stated salary AND, they're completely anonymous. At best, they're mildly well known in their local communities. Their kids aren't fodder for TMZ. No one will bring up that they were mean kids in high school 40 fricking years ago. None of that.
I submit to you that yeah, we get a long line of people. People who are clearly motivated due to the POWER involved. People who frankly, must kinda not even like their families or at least not like them enough to spare them the bull shite. And, we get a lot of people(just look at congress) who frankly, wouldn't qualify for HALF that salary doing any regular jobs in the world.
So yeah, it's $200+K plus power. You're going to get people lining up. Unfortunately, it also comes with enough bull shite that you aren't getting the RIGHT people lining up.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:12 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Attorneys at good firms take a major pay cut to sit on the bench. Some entry level positions pay $180k plus a bonus. That said, you shouldn't have to use money to entice an attorney to leave private practice and those that would only switch for a high salary probably aren't those who should be on the bench anyway.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:16 pm to Hahawg
quote:Sigh. This is a painfully stupid way to look at it.
That said, you shouldn't have to use money to entice an attorney to leave private practice and those that would only switch for a high salary probably aren't those who should be on the bench anyway.
Do you want talent or not?
Sheesh.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:17 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
They make millions speaking around the world.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:19 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Sigh. This is a painfully stupid way to look at it.
I actually disagree in this case. Principle is far and away the most important characteristic of a SC Justice. These are the arbiters of our rights as human beings.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:24 pm to LSUminati
quote:Then you're wrong.
I actually disagree in this case. Principle is far and away the most important characteristic of a SC Justice. These are the arbiters of our rights as human beings.
Why the frick do people think the natural economic drivers of the world suddenly cease to be relevant when you want to decide shite based upon emotion?
Do you people think that private companies don't give a frick about principles? Why yes, I'm sure you do think that. But, that would be wrong.
But, before I can worry about choosing the candidate with the greatest combination of talent and principles, I'd like to have access to as many candidates as possible.
I mean, A LOT of people with very solid principles also have families. Families who absolutely WILL be in the firing line during the nastiness that can be associated with the bench.
And, ya know what? They have NORMAL human conversations with those families. I can imagine talking to my wife and saying, "honey, there's this job I'm kind of interested in. It's going to pay me far less than I make now and FAAAAR less than I can make in the future. Oh, and if I take it, every last think you ever did wrong in your life, or our children did will suddenly be an open book. Worse, every thing someone can even think is mildly embarrassing will be an open book. What do ya think honey?"
Do I have to tell you how a lot of wives and children would respond?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:32 pm to ShortyRob
quote:You raise some interesting points. Don't know that there's anyway to separate power from megalomania, though. Maybe we could strengthen privacy laws, but people who won't expose their families for $400K aren't going to do it for $1M or $2M. And people who would do it for $400K will do it for free.
I don't really think this is entirely true.
I mean, yes, you get people lining up for the job. But, are you getting the RIGHT people lining up for it? For regular jobs, there are TWO factors to whether a Salary is the right one. 1)Does it attract candidates for the job and 2)Are they GOOD candidates.
I've talked about the salary problem for congress and the President for probably 15 years. To paraphrase a longer argument.
Imagine you weren't electing people for those jobs. Instead, imagine you were running job listings for them. What knowledge skills and abilities would you hope the applicants have? I know that when I think about the KSAs, it's a damned impressive list that I'd like to see and a ridiculously diverse skill set.
Oh, but now imagine that in your job listing, on top of that, you wrote the caveat. "Oh, and if you apply, everyone in your family is fair game to have their lives turned inside out going back as far as the eye can see. If your husband got a DUI 30 years ago, THAT will be news. If your daughters party like normal college kids, THAT will be news. People will call your kids ugly, people will drag your sister, mother, father, uncle, and even long time friends through the mud. All for the salary of $XXXX.
I will submit to you that we have a LOT of people in this country who COMFORTABLY meet the skill set you'd write. Unfortunately, most of those people make MORE than the stated salary AND, they're completely anonymous. At best, they're mildly well known in their local communities. Their kids aren't fodder for TMZ. No one will bring up that they were mean kids in high school 40 fricking years ago. None of that.
I submit to you that yeah, we get a long line of people. People who are clearly motivated due to the POWER involved. People who frankly, must kinda not even like their families or at least not like them enough to spare them the bull shite. And, we get a lot of people(just look at congress) who frankly, wouldn't qualify for HALF that salary doing any regular jobs in the world.
So yeah, it's $200+K plus power. You're going to get people lining up. Unfortunately, it also comes with enough bull shite that you aren't getting the RIGHT people lining up.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:36 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:Honestly all the national office salaries seem low.
Right now they get paid $240-255,000. Seems kinda low, does it not?
Not to put too fine a point on it, but when the POTUS is awarded salary at a fraction of the income of several people on this board, I'd say that salary is just a bit low. I don't give a damn if the recipient is Obama, Carter, Nixon, or Trump. IMO the job and our national capacity warrant at least $1M/HOR seat, $2M/Senate or SCOTUS seat, and $4M for the POTUS.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:46 pm to Navytiger74
quote:I try.
You raise some interesting points.
quote:You can't. You can only hope to reduce it.
Don't know that there's anyway to separate power from megalomania, though
quote:Probably a mountain too high.
Maybe we could strengthen privacy laws,
quote:
but people who won't expose their families for $400K aren't going to do it for $1M or $2M.
Meh. I think this is overstated. Sure, many would still remain anonymous. But again, we're just trying to improve and I submit that like everything in the world, there are people across the spectrum. You have the "no fricking way, not for all the money in the world" people. You have the "gimme that job.........I loves me some power" people.
But, you also probably have a lot of people who fall into the, "many, I'd like to do it but it's just hard to justify the hardships, the nasty shite etc etc while taking a pay cut too!
And remember, this has another element not found that hypothetical job listing I talked about.
At least in the hypothetical, your family only gets shite on if you get the job. We are hoping highly talented people will run.........which means their families will be totally shite on AND........best part, it COULD damage their normal career...........and, they might not even get the job!
Remember, very few people start at the top. Think about this almost from the bottom up. Think about just how shitty a person you generally have to be to run for State Legislature and open yourself to that shite when you may never amount to anything politically?
I know I'm cynical, but my view is, the current setup pretty much guarantees that at least 75% of the people who run for office at the rungs of the ladder that eventually lead to the top are completely shitty people.
The ONLY rational reason for even running is liking power just a wee bit too fricking much.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Yep.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but when the POTUS is awarded salary at a fraction of the income of several people on this board, I'd say that salary is just a bit low. I don't give a damn if the recipient is Obama, Carter, Nixon, or Trump. IMO the job and our national capacity warrant at least $1M/HOR seat, $2M/Senate or SCOTUS seat, and $4M for the POTUS.
I literally was just part of a meeting where the top dog in the room made more than any soul in congress or the Senate and he's pushing Oval office money. An immensely talented businessman and here's the best part. He's not even really a somebody in the overall corporation. If he went to a meeting of their top executives, I doubt they'd recognize him and put a name with the face.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 6:51 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Right now they get paid $240-255,000. Seems kinda low, does it not?
Hmmm, a lot of them are carried out feet first so probably not.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:02 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
What general is making 300k?
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:03 pm to ShortyRob
I gather from your cursing that you're heavily emotionally invested in increasing Supreme Court salaries.
Looking at the amount of federal judges pulled from academia or public service (federal prosecutors usually), it would seem to me that the most qualified people have already chosen lower salaries before going to the bench. That is unless you honestly believe people in private practice are just refusing to switch to the bench after being approached. If you believe that, go look up the number of people who clerked for Supreme Court judges (the cream of the crop) then moved to academia or public service. It's pretty high. If you don't want to do all that work, you can just call opposing viewpoints stupid and assume the same motivators exist across careers.
Looking at the amount of federal judges pulled from academia or public service (federal prosecutors usually), it would seem to me that the most qualified people have already chosen lower salaries before going to the bench. That is unless you honestly believe people in private practice are just refusing to switch to the bench after being approached. If you believe that, go look up the number of people who clerked for Supreme Court judges (the cream of the crop) then moved to academia or public service. It's pretty high. If you don't want to do all that work, you can just call opposing viewpoints stupid and assume the same motivators exist across careers.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:12 pm to td01241
quote:
What general is making 300k?
A 4-Star makes base pay, better than $17K per month depending on time in service. $20K isn't uncommon.
Their housing allowance, assuming they're married is $2178. They also get BAS of about $370.
For the guys with $20K base pay, that's $270K.
Keeping in mind that of that pay, the BAH and the BAS isn't taxable. Hence, a bit over $30K isn't taxed. In their bracket, that effectively means it's like earning more another 10+K.
Get's pretty damned close and SOME 4 Stars have base pay of $20,500.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:13 pm to Hahawg
quote:Sadly, I think you actually think the above qualifies as a refutation.
Looking at the amount of federal judges pulled from academia or public service (federal prosecutors usually), it would seem to me that the most qualified people have already chosen lower salaries before going to the bench. That is unless you honestly believe people in private practice are just refusing to switch to the bench after being approached. If you believe that, go look up the number of people who clerked for Supreme Court judges (the cream of the crop) then moved to academia or public service. It's pretty high. If you don't want to do all that work, you can just call opposing viewpoints stupid and assume the same motivators exist across careers.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:23 pm to ShortyRob
I suppose I could've just posted a one sentence quip instead.
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:31 pm to ShortyRob
There ain't many 4 star generals brah
Posted on 1/31/17 at 7:37 pm to td01241
quote:I simply answered the question. I didnt say their were a bunch
There ain't many 4 star generals brah
Popular
Back to top


0




