- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How hard would it be for a dem president to rescind all of president Trump
Posted on 1/18/18 at 3:01 am
Posted on 1/18/18 at 3:01 am
Accomplishment just like Trump annihiated obama’s Legacy, if elected?
Restore food stamp and entitlements, open the flood gates to illegals, free heath care, increases taxes etc...
Only safe bet are the judges.
Restore food stamp and entitlements, open the flood gates to illegals, free heath care, increases taxes etc...
Only safe bet are the judges.
14
Posted on 1/18/18 at 3:19 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
free heath care, increases taxes
These were done by congress not by EO.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 3:48 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:Obama's """Legacy""" was built on EO's. That is not the direction Trump is going. Taxes with require Congress. Replacing the mandate will require Congress. Whatever DACA deal is struck will require Congress.
Trump annihiated obama’s Legacy
Posted on 1/18/18 at 4:23 am to Northwestern tiger
TBH the most disturbing thing out of this is the recent ruling that not only is BO entitled to do what he wished via EO, he is allowed protections from them being reversed by a successor.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 4:27 am to Volvagia
quote:Won't stand. But given a Hillary appointed SCOTUS, Libs and Cons should both shudder at where we were headed from a governance stance. Unbelievable how audacious the courts have become.
he is allowed protections from them being reversed by a successor
Posted on 1/18/18 at 4:38 am to Northwestern tiger
Just pray we never have another Alinsky tactic using communist as president
EOs aside, we barely survived!
We'd probably be goners if Hill had won
EOs aside, we barely survived!
We'd probably be goners if Hill had won
Posted on 1/18/18 at 5:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Won't stand. But given a Hillary appointed SCOTUS, Libs and Cons should both shudder at where we were headed from a governance stance. Unbelievable how audacious the courts have become.
This
If Hillary would have won and taken the Senate then SCOTUS would have been turned in to a National 9th Circuit Making bad legal decisions that would affect peoples lives for the next 100 years.
This post was edited on 1/18/18 at 5:37 am
Posted on 1/18/18 at 5:35 am to Volvagia
quote:
TBH the most disturbing thing out of this is the recent ruling that not only is BO entitled to do what he wished via EO, he is allowed protections from them being reversed by a successor.
No ruling declaring that is legitimate. And the notion that an EO can't be reversed by future presidents just defies common sense.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 7:25 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
How hard would it be for a dem president to rescind all of president Trump
With the stupidity in this country I don't believe it would be that difficult.
Here's the narrative:
"Dear America,
We have grown too fast and we're too strong. We need roll back all of the Trump economic policies so we're not so strong and intimidating to the 3rd countries around the world. We need to be their equals and we need to lead from behind. Just trust me and everything will be OK......for the 3rd world countries."
Thank and God bless the other guys
Your Demtwat Prez
Posted on 1/18/18 at 8:28 am to Northwestern tiger
It would happen in a blink of an eye because EVERY Dem would vote lock step and the usual Rino's would assist. There would be no court reversals or challenges like there are now. Trump's victory has exposed all of this yet Americans are so duped they still can't see it
Posted on 1/18/18 at 8:29 am to Northwestern tiger
Taxes would take Congress. So should immigration technically.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 8:32 am to Northwestern tiger
It's a safe bet that it won't be as easy because Congress is doing the heavy lifting as they should.
They represent the whole country and most of the time act like they only represent their party.
DACA isn't a law.
You want "so-called dreamers" to be eligible to stay...Congress needs to fundamentally change the laws of this land.
Are you finally ready for fundamental change?
They represent the whole country and most of the time act like they only represent their party.
DACA isn't a law.
You want "so-called dreamers" to be eligible to stay...Congress needs to fundamentally change the laws of this land.
Are you finally ready for fundamental change?
Posted on 1/18/18 at 8:38 am to roadGator
quote:
DACA isn't a law.
You want "so-called dreamers" to be eligible to stay...Congress needs to fundamentally change the laws of this land.
Are you finally ready for fundamental change?
I don't mind the principle behind DACA and would not have a problem with Congress rectifying the issue through legislation. But it was certainly an extraconstitutional overreach by the Executive Branch.
This post was edited on 1/18/18 at 8:52 am
Posted on 1/18/18 at 8:48 am to roadGator
quote:
Are you finally ready for fundamental change?
No and certainly not by the assholes in DC today. The 'Dreamers' need a law ONLY for them so politards and courts can't abuse it like the 14th amendment. The 'Dreamers' for the most part can stay but they shouldn't get immediate citizenship or any entitlements. The criminal dreamers and the welfare dreamers need to go.....and all of the dreamers parents need to go. Violating laws need to have consequences.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:And Unconstitutional in their actions. Flaunting their biased opinions from the bench....
Unbelievable how audacious the courts have become.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:41 am to Northwestern tiger
Not hard. Trump has issued far more EO’s than Obama at this point, and now that the GOP has set precedent with the nuclear option, it will be easy for a democratic congress to act quickly.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:43 am to Old Hellen Yeller
Does a President need an EO to undo an EO?
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:52 am to Volvagia
quote:
TBH the most disturbing thing out of this is the recent ruling that not only is BO entitled to do what he wished via EO, he is allowed protections from them being reversed by a successor.
Just another piece of evidence supporting my contention that the USA is finished and will be subjugated by a Leftist Global Government -- eventually -- it will take 150 years for it to happen.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:53 am to Wtodd
quote:
With the stupidity in this country I don't believe it would be that difficult. Here's the narrative: "Dear America, We have grown too fast and we're too strong. We need roll back all of the Trump economic policies so we're not so strong and intimidating to the 3rd countries around the world. We need to be their equals and we need to lead from behind. Just trust me and everything will be OK......for the 3rd world countries." Thank and God bless the other guys Your Demtwat Prez
The brainwashed masses will swallow it hook line and sinker, ably assisted by mass media and pop culture.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 9:56 am to Northwestern tiger
His EO's and his shaping of the Executive Branch and Cabinets can be reversed pretty easily. Legislation would have to be done via Congress, so it would depend on the makeup of Congress at that time.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News