- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How does Alvin Bragg get past the statute of limitations?
Posted on 3/22/23 at 4:35 pm to KAGTASTIC
Posted on 3/22/23 at 4:35 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
Random question...what gives Bragg the ability to charge him on federal election charges?
you just replied to my post clearly explaining how
he must get trump, on record, admitting he only did it intending to commit a federal elections crime, and that it wasnt just about making a money grabbing whore telling lies just go away
1
Posted on 3/22/23 at 4:40 pm to GumboPot
He is Black and you are probably raciss fo axing
Posted on 3/22/23 at 4:49 pm to GumboPot
By being an evil piece of shite.
Be like you jaywalking several years ago...and no one thought it was a big deal, but then someone who personally hates you became da, and they twisted that jaywalking thing in such a way to try and turn it into a felony... and attempt to frick you up.
Be like you jaywalking several years ago...and no one thought it was a big deal, but then someone who personally hates you became da, and they twisted that jaywalking thing in such a way to try and turn it into a felony... and attempt to frick you up.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 3/22/23 at 4:53 pm to Indefatigable
Nope. Would get laughed out of court...well fck, dem prog filth judge,OMB...you have a point.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:19 pm to Houag80
quote:
Would get laughed out of court
Why?
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:21 pm to GumboPot
Something as insignificant as the law is not going to stop them
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:34 pm to Indefatigable
quote:So in other words, if 'Indefatigable' sells a business in Texas, then less than a year later he moves to Georgia, the Texas statute of limitation on fraud supposedly associated with the sale essentially never ends because the defendant no longer lives in state?
By arguing that Trump's time residing in DC and Florida tolled/paused the running of the limitation period.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:40 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Why must he do this?
Because Trump can simply say that he paid Daniels so she’d STFU and not cause his family any further embarrassment. Unless Bragg has a portal inside Trump’s mind he can’t prove otherwise.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:44 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
The felony pretzel twisting
+
The same Judge that oversaw the Trump Org trial, the trail of his CFO, and the one overseeing the Bannon case
=
Democrats are vile human scum Pinkos
They aren't just Pinkos any more, they are more like Mao's Red Guard.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 6:43 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
So in other words, if 'Indefatigable' sells a business in Texas, then less than a year later he moves to Georgia, the Texas statute of limitation on fraud supposedly associated with the sale essentially never ends because the defendant no longer lives in state?
No, not in any way.
My comment addressed the NY criminal statute of limitations for nonviolent felonies, involving NY courts interpreting NY law.
It isn’t some general principle, and I didn’t just make it up. NY courts have applied their own criminal statutes that way in the past, and so I’m assuming that is how the Manhattan DA is also operating/arguing.
My hypothesis is probably more accurate than “the Manhattan DA is just ignoring the law and saying frick it,” is it not?
I am simply answering the OP.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 3/22/23 at 6:47 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
LSUconvert
Convert, like you converted from a male to a female?
Posted on 3/22/23 at 6:55 pm to Indefatigable
quote:So in other words, if 'Indefatigable' sells a business in NY, then less than a year later he moves to Georgia, the NY statute of limitation on fraud supposedly associated with the sale essentially never ends because the defendant no longer lives in NY?
My comment addressed the NY criminal statute of limitations for nonviolent felonies, involving NY courts interpreting NY law.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
So in other words, if 'Indefatigable' sells a business in NY, then less than a year later he moves to Georgia, the NY statute of limitation on fraud supposedly associated with the sale essentially never ends because the defendant no longer lives in NY?
Maybe. It seems that NY criminal law allows for the tolling of the SOL under certain circumstances when the alleged perpetrator is not physically in NY.
Again, just an assumption after some surface level research in order to try and answer the OP with an explanation beyond “they’re just totally ignoring the law”.
I’m not advocating the merits of it. In fact I think it circumvents the entire purpose of having a SOL to begin with. Apparently at least one district of the NY Supreme Court disagrees with my opinion though.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:16 pm to NC_Tigah
No CPL Section 30.10(4) (a) sets a maximum tolling period of five years. Civil fraud has a six year SOL in NY. Criminal actions dealing with fraud range across grand larceny, criminal possession of a forged instrument, forgery, falsifying business records, and identity theft. Thus, you could have an criminal Sol from 2 to 5 years. a charge would have to commence within at least 10 years possibly 7 years) from the last event of the fraud. If the perpetrator moves back to NY within five years then the SOL would expire in two to five years minus the time before they moved
Nevertheless, I have not seen anything that indicates a tolling issue outside this thread. The GJ is conducted in secret, but the commentators I read seem to gravitate toward the lsuhoohoo theory of a five year SOL with the predicate act occurring later
ETAC: difference in criminal fraud ranges
Nevertheless, I have not seen anything that indicates a tolling issue outside this thread. The GJ is conducted in secret, but the commentators I read seem to gravitate toward the lsuhoohoo theory of a five year SOL with the predicate act occurring later
ETAC: difference in criminal fraud ranges
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:19 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Nevertheless, I have not seen anything that indicates a tolling issue outside this thread.
Really? Every decent article I have seen on the subject mentions the apparent SOL issue.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:40 pm to keakar
But now, Costello has presented information, that Cohen said Trump never knew about the payments, and Trump never payed him( Cohen, in a formal Document ie. Written proof). I would think that if money wasn’t payed, might be a problem, if true…
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:17 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Bragg has a portal inside Trump’s mind he can’t prove otherwise.
There are other ways to prove intent.
Pay attention.
Posted on 3/22/23 at 8:33 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
How is it possible a hack like Bragg passed the NY bar?
parents were both educated.
Bragg went to Harvard and Harvard law.
so much for your attempted smear.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 3/23/23 at 8:05 pm to CelticDog
quote:
parents were both educated. Bragg went to Harvard and Harvard law. so much for your attempted smear.
So now we know he's a complete dumbfrick.
No smear, fact.
Posted on 3/23/23 at 8:19 pm to GumboPot
Bragg will do what his globalist pimp sugar daddy tells him. Definitely a down low brotha.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News