- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:16 pm to TigerBlazer
quote:
I remember when that was the hallmark of being conservative. Not anyone’s business, esp not the govt.
Why can’t we live and let live? Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
You're confused.
It's not anyones business until it's shoved into society, into "education" and into the legal system. What happens to your concept of "it's not anyone's business" then? Why can't we live and let live without serious mental illnesses foisted on us as "normal"?
The guy across the street beats his wife, abuses his kids and sells crack to grade school kids. None of that has anything to do with you. Why do you care? Live and let live...right?
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:17 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
So where's the compassion for the mentally ill?
I have deep compassion for the mentally ill, and they deserve help.
But when society starts to normalize and embrace the steps taken by institutions such as the university of texas—which chooses to manufacture the idea of “toxic masculinity” as a legitimate mental health issue—I believe it’s a problem.

This post was edited on 7/7/18 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:19 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Pathetically transparent deflection.
You're projecting again.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:19 pm to Joshjrn
Non-Mentally ill heterosexual male. Fixed it for you. You can make up all the names you want, but in the end I am the normal one.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:20 pm to Brazos
They also scream “it’s science” when pushing climate change.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:20 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Are you saying it's more a desire to simply deviate from the construct, or does the construct shape the determination?
I'm not sure precisely what you're asking me, so I'll clarify generally:
I think that some people flaunt societal norms as an act of counter culture rebellion. I also think that some people follow societal norms simply out of fear of being ostracized. However, I think the majority of people express behaviors that are a culmination of genetic and epigenetic factors as well as early socialization.
Not sure if that helped
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:21 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
You gave your opinion on "scales" in general. You didn't actually answer my question.
That makes no sense. Your defense of the "reality" of transgender was what you offered...someone's theory of "scales". Thats what I replied to.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:22 pm to Dale51
quote:
You're projecting again.
no u
Read back over every post I've made in this thread. I've done nothing but try to clearly convey my positions and respond to any question posed. If you want to cry in a corner because you don't like what I say, that's your malfunction, not mine.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:22 pm to Joshjrn
quote:My position is that anyone is capable of being attracted to anyone else depending on various social conditions and that anyone is capable of engaging in sexual intercourse with anyone else regardless of any sort of generic preference. I reject the notion of an objective spectrum that people subjectively find themselves on with homosexuality or gender.
So it's your position that people can only be fully heterosexual or fully homosexual, and further, that everyone is equally heterosexual or homosexual.
There is homosexual behavior and heterosexual behavior. There is the male sex/gender and the female sex/gender.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:24 pm to UPT
quote:
the scientific study of the human mind and its functions, especially those affecting behavior in a given context.
Thats nice.
Psychology is incapable of following scientific methodology, regardless of a printed definition. Science relies on objective facts and not "feelings" or theories about abnormal ideations.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:26 pm to Dale51
quote:
That makes no sense. Your defense of the "reality" of transgender was what you offered...someone's theory of "scales". Thats what I replied to.
Straw. Man.
And not only a strawman, but an utterly misidentified strawman. I referenced the Kinsey Scale to tease out people's thoughts on the much larger question of gender being a spectrum; it had nothing to do with transgenderism, per se.
If one accepts that sex and gender are different, it defies both logic and observation to argue that there are zero people on this planet who display behaviors that are commonly associated with a gender that is different from their sex.
The two discussions are entirely discrete.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:29 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
My position is that anyone is capable of being attracted to anyone else depending on various social conditions
I find that statement to be extremely interesting, and I don't mean that in any kind of mean spirited or rhetorical way. Would you mind spending a bit more time on it? Is it really your position that everyone's sexual preference is malleable?
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:31 pm to Joshjrn
False. There are two genders, male and female. That's the way it's always been and always be. This shite stain will mocked and laughed about in the future. It will be known as the time that Donald J Trump stepped in and saved us all.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:33 pm to Joshjrn
I would simply suggest that the idea that some things like gender are simply "societal constructs" ignores how determinative such things are in natural reality. I also acknowledge that there will be outliers who wish to, for whatever reason (choice? genetics?) deviate from that determinative. I don't know what that means as far as what others should be demanded to "accept", but I'd guess therein lies the rub in most cases.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:35 pm to Brazos
quote:
False. There are two genders, male and female. That's the way it's always been and always be. This shite stain will mocked and laughed about in the future. It will be known as the time that Donald J Trump stepped in and saved us all.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I take it you believe THAT there are more than two genders.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:44 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I would simply suggest that the idea that some things like gender are simply "societal constructs" ignores how determinative such things are in natural reality. I also acknowledge that there will be outliers who wish to, for whatever reason (choice? genetics?) deviate from that determinative. I don't know what that means as far as what others should be demanded to "accept", but I'd guess therein lies the rub in most cases.
I don't know if you and I are actually that far apart.
I think the starting point is determining whether there are universal "gender roles" to begin with. While there are certainly some broad similarities (warfare is overwhelmingly masculine), there are exceptions even to those norms (Amazonian culture, Viking culture, etc). Further, there are some things that vary differently by culture. For example, depending on the culture you find yourself in, cooking is can be utterly feminine, utterly masculine, or anywhere in between. We could spend hours going over example after example of that kind of "purely cultural" construct.
But once you move past that, there are always going to be people that don't seem to fit that cultural role. There are famous stories of women hiding their sex to join armies, be surgeons, etc. There are southeast Asian cultures that have "sexually male gender female" individuals that have been defined as their own category for long before anyone had ever heard of a SJW.
But I believe what you're getting out is how much choice is involved in this process. Even if we concede that sex and gender are separate, hell, even if we concede that gender is a continuum, that doesn't necessarily mean that gender is fluid. I certainly think it's an interesting question, but I also think reasonable people can disagree on the answer.
This post was edited on 7/7/18 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:46 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I don't know if you and I are actually that far apart.
I wasn't suggesting we were.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:48 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
And not only a strawman, but an utterly misidentified strawman. I referenced the Kinsey Scale to tease out people's thoughts on the much larger question of gender being a spectrum; it had nothing to do with transgenderism, per se.
Then you misidentified the point, which was, someones theory of "explanation" based on their preferred understanding based on their "scale" does not make it reality..per se.
I
Popular
Back to top



1




