How about Jim Jordan on the intelligence committee?

Even suit jackets are afraid of Mr Jordan.

I actually think he has been focusing on the wrong point. But he is going at it for sure.

quote:

---

There's another one that's doing well but his name slips me.

---

The gray/white haired older guy. He’s been on point too.

Edit for Hubba: Turner?

quote:

---

I actually think he has been focusing on the wrong point. But he is going at it for sure.

---

Yeah. Tucker (?) is the guy that really dropped the bomb by pointing out every damn thing Sondland said today was based on presumptions, and not on facts.

Shouldn't have taken so long for that to be pointed out.

eta-Turner is the guy I was thinking of.

quote:

---

Jordan and Stefanik are turning into rock stars in all this.

---

Turner picked up a Coat this week as well.

JJ, Ratcliffe and Turner have done good work along with Stefanik. Stewart and Connelay have had moments as well. Hell, even Hurd has made a point or two. Overall, I would say they did a good job.

quote:

---

That too. I just want them to hammer the point that if the President had any reason to have concern of possible corruption in Ukraine, it is his responsibility to inquire. Anyone's opinion/presumption is irrelevant after that.

---

This point can’t be overstated. The POTUS is entitled to investigate corruption. Anything after that is moot.

And no one has bothered to define “Bribery” as intended by the impeachment clause - and that is, that a president may be bought by a foreign country. That’s clearly not what’s happened. Bribery shouldn’t even be on the table.

Jordan isn't stupid, that's for sure. That whole panel of Republicans were top notch.

quote:

---

This point can’t be overstated. The POTUS is entitled to investigate corruption

---

Actually, defense and state investigate that, by law, in order provide funding. Congress appropriates funding, they approved funding after that investigation was completed. President, by law, cannot block that funding - law made in 70 from Nixon blocking funding.

So it cannot be overstated that you are wrong, that most republican points dance around the actual issue - for instance, “the investigation never happened” as if the attempt that undermines the interest of the nation isn’t a problem - and that your boy Jim Jordan, whether making good points or bad ones, just yells over and talks constantly so that no one can get a word in.

But you are of the mind that the one who yells loudest must be right.

MAGA

Jordan = Democrats lied accusing him of being involved in covering up sexual harassment while coaching at OSU.

Nunez = was temporarily removed from House Intelligence Committee when Democrats falsely filed ethics complaints after he went to WH to review top secret documents.

Radcliffe would’ve been attacked more severely if he hadn’t removed himself from consideration as intelligence chief.

Stefanik has been call trashed but that’s not a big deal. We’ll see what Democrats trot out there about her as we continue.

The story on Jordan is a lie and hit piece. Same thing with the ethics complaint on Nunes.