- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/5/25 at 4:52 am to RohanGonzales
Lawler from New York is what I had seen.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:04 am to RohanGonzales
quote:Mike Lawler of NY. Did make it through foreign affairs cmte.
5 pages of whining for nothing, apparently nobody knows who submitted it and there was ZERO movement to round up votes and pass it
It simply expands the existing anti-boycott law to international organizations such as NATO.
So if that's your thing, and it isn't mine, I'm not sure how you enforce that. Would it mandate we withdraw from NATO if they boycott Israel? (I might be for that... the pulling out of NATO thing).
It seems like conservative virtue signaling to me.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:49 am to blueboy
quote:
What is the point of these laws?
To further line the pockets of Congresspeople on the take.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 5:55 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
apparently nobody knows who submitted it
It was Mike Lawler, Republican from New York.
Posted on 5/5/25 at 6:15 am to GumboPot
Apartheid?
What a poor use of the term.
I mean, is isolating terrorists (Hamas) a bad idea in this guys mind?
Otherwise, he has valid points.
What a poor use of the term.
I mean, is isolating terrorists (Hamas) a bad idea in this guys mind?
Otherwise, he has valid points.
Page 6 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News