re: Historian who confronted Davos billionaires leaks Tucker Carlson rant

quote:

---

I will say this: if I were having someone audit something for me, I’d hire a Dutchman.

---

You know, now that you say that, I have worked with a guy at a Luxembourg asset manager who has a Dutch last name, and the guy was an absolute stickler for minutiae.

The assholes don't believe in tipping either and will flat out tell you that. Horrible culture.

Never heard of this guy. But that fact he made an apperance at Davos to speak "Truth To Power," or whatever he's pitching, is kind of a red flag to me that he is controlled opposition.

Not that I'll ever be debating him on TV, but I think I can smell an interesting background on him.

Also just looking at him, my spidey sense is tingling with an alert that he is prone to babbling non-stop, not allowing his opponent to respond, and interrupting constantly, while becoming aggrieved if he himself is interrupted.

So unlike Tucker, I have a way to deal with individuals like this.

Duck Tape.

First time he interrupts me, I tape his mouth shut. When I'm done talking, I rip it off and tell him he can now respond.

But first I let him know I have a whole roll of the stuff.

Best of all this guy... if you squeezed him, you could fill up jugs with Soy. So, I dunno I imagine I could have lots of fun with his hypocrisy and personal habits.

Only half joking, but one thing about these guys is no one cares about them. So they haven't done any research into them.

The dude has things about him you could spin into a firestorm - you just don't see or they are not selected and propped up to "Strike The Pose," if they don't.

quote:

---

Its a pretty easy argument to be made that if there was no Fox News, there would only be 'one side' of the story across the other news channels. Thats even more dangerous than having two sides with billionaires backing them. I hate Fox New but understand the importance of having the other sides arguments out there. It's necessary and there is no way to go back at this point.

---

So you don’t actually want an honest media, you just want a dishonest media that pushes your views. Got it.

If only more people spoke like this to loser communists and socialists, maybe we wouldn’t have to deal with them.

They deserve to be berated and have their asses kicked again and again and again. They’re thieves.

quote:

---

Being a modern Liberal means being totally oblivious to irony.

---

Interesting. How about you unpack this for me a bit. Where have I defended dishonest media? Be specific please. Or are you just putting words in my mouth because I didn’t vote for Trump like many on here love to do?

You Tucker worshipers are NPC af

quote:

---

Laughing at your attempt to bastardized our language.

---

“Your language” huh? Y’all are funny The 4chanification of the right is a sight to see.

quote:

---

That accurately describes the current situation. So it's ironic you are accusing someone of desiring something "you" already have - and use constantly.

---

You seem to be having trouble. First of all “I” don’t possess anything. I don’t deny that the liberal media so to speak exists nor do I argue that it’s a good thing or, as the poster I quoted said “necessary” for balance. The media pushes establishment corporate democrats, whom I don’t often support.

The “well they do to it so it’s okay” mentality is a big problem in politics today and in this situation gives the impression that an honest media isn’t what many who post here actually desire.

quote:

---

he got tucker because he has money?

---

Well I mean, are you arguing that Carlson being paid millions to be a cable talk show host wouldn't influence the views he expresses on the show?