- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hillary Clinton spent $10 million dollars for Obama to approve fake Russia investigation
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:51 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:51 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Now, conspiracy to overthrow the United States government has no statute of limitations.
Bless Real Rob’s heart
1
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:55 am to Decatur
I laughed at that. You know I think Russiagate was a disgrace and massive scandal, but these right-wing influencers are pushing slop fairy tales.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:56 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:Decatur still believes.
You know I think Russiagate was a disgrace and massive scandal
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:57 am to Bunk Moreland
The Left tried to get him removed from office and foment hatred of a man who had done nothing wrong.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:57 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
You know I think Russiagate was a disgrace and massive scandal, but these right-wing influencers are pushing slop fairy tales.
And they're using echo chamber reinforcement to try to punish pointing this out. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad and transparent.
However, the saddest part is when they project DKE bullshite.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
You did say that Hillary was up to some frickery (my word), yes?
Is your position that while unethical things occurred, these did not cross the illegal threshold?
Also, I do not like the word conspiracy, unless used in a legal sense via a charge like “conspiracy to commit _______”. But when conspiracy is looked at in a more broad term like conspired to ______, then it simply describing they planned or appeared they had plans to do something. Smoke doesn’t always mean there is fire, but sometimes fire doesn’t mean a strict illegal action.
Is this a fair assessment of some of your views? I am not asking you to argue the legal merits of what is being discussed but instead trying understand your general position on these types of matters.
(I think I had 3 questions in there, but if there are more than that, I’d be grateful for at least your view on all)
Is your position that while unethical things occurred, these did not cross the illegal threshold?
Also, I do not like the word conspiracy, unless used in a legal sense via a charge like “conspiracy to commit _______”. But when conspiracy is looked at in a more broad term like conspired to ______, then it simply describing they planned or appeared they had plans to do something. Smoke doesn’t always mean there is fire, but sometimes fire doesn’t mean a strict illegal action.
Is this a fair assessment of some of your views? I am not asking you to argue the legal merits of what is being discussed but instead trying understand your general position on these types of matters.
(I think I had 3 questions in there, but if there are more than that, I’d be grateful for at least your view on all)
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:58 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
The Left tried to get him removed from office
As pointed out early in this thread, the 2 impeachments had NOTHING to do with Russiagate. Nothing whatsoever.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
The 2 year fake investigation by Mueller? That didn't have any intended consequences'?
They were trying find him guilty in the court of public opinion, first, and then if Mueller could have fabricated ANYTHING, they'd have pushed forward.
Stop pretending otherwise.
They were trying find him guilty in the court of public opinion, first, and then if Mueller could have fabricated ANYTHING, they'd have pushed forward.
Stop pretending otherwise.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The primary driver of the Russian collusion narrative was the special prosecutor that Trump's own admin created, I might add. This investigation led to a complete exoneration of Trump within the collusion narrative.
Point of clarification: Trump was never investigated under the conspiracy prong of the Russia investigation. He was investigated solely for obstruction of justice.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:14 am to Decatur
quote:jRexcatur's witch hunt hardon still after all these years.
Point of clarification: Trump was never investigated under the conspiracy prong of the Russia investigation. He was investigated solely for obstruction of justice.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:15 am to Decatur
quote:
Point of clarification: Trump was never investigated under the conspiracy prong of the Russia investigation. He was investigated solely for obstruction of justice.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:16 am to Jbird
You don’t have to constantly troll people all day long every day, Jbizzle.
There’s another way.
There’s another way.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 8:17 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:17 am to Decatur
Troll?
Dude you still believe the piss dossier.
Dude you still believe the piss dossier.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:21 am to Jbird
quote:
Troll?
Yeah, it’s pretty much all you ever do.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:22 am to Decatur
You
still
believe
the
piss
dossier.
Fact.
still
believe
the
piss
dossier.
Fact.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:22 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
The 2 year fake investigation by Mueller? That didn't have any intended consequences'?
The investigation that started by the Trump admin exonerated Trump. It gave him one of his biggest PR victories in term 1.
quote:
They were trying find him guilty in the court of public opinion,
The Trump admin? They started the Mueller investigation not DEMs
quote:
Stop pretending otherwise.
You don't seem to have a solid grasp on the facts. I'm not the one pretending
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:23 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Will the army of democrat federal judges step in to shield Hildebeast from conviction? I believe there's a term for this? Seditious Conspiracy.
Which brings me to ask? Will we see a cuffed Hildbebeast doing her perp walk?
Once and for all we need to do away with the two-tiered Justice System.
Nobody is above the law........not even Hildabeast .
President Trump is right about........everything.
Which brings me to ask? Will we see a cuffed Hildbebeast doing her perp walk?
Once and for all we need to do away with the two-tiered Justice System.
Nobody is above the law........not even Hildabeast .
President Trump is right about........everything.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:24 am to Jbird
I always said it needed corroboration. You can go back and read my posts again if it wasn’t clear to you.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 8:25 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:26 am to Decatur
quote:
Trump was never investigated under the conspiracy prong of the Russia investigation. He was investigated solely for obstruction of justice.
You're conflating specific legal terms with the actual discussion on the broader concept of Russian Collusion/muh Russia
The report got into tons of details about potential collusion and found none, which is remarkable given how many countries (including Russia) were trying to get Trump to make a mistake
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 8:27 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:27 am to GeorgePaton
quote:
I believe there's a term for this? Seditious Conspiracy.
HRC engaged in seditious conspiracy against Obama? Explain.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News