- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/9/25 at 12:33 pm to L1C4
quote:
I can't wait for the wailing and gnashing of teeth on this board if Rand Paul and Thomas Massie speak out against this. Lol.
"Obstructionist."
According to tCult.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 12:41 pm to IMSA_Fan
i believe it’s more efficient and ethically superior.
i’d rather redirect corporate earnings back to the consumer than let it trickle down as equity ownership for somebody’s retirement account. the economic impact of a direct tax on the high-income individual is much greater.
i’d rather redirect corporate earnings back to the consumer than let it trickle down as equity ownership for somebody’s retirement account. the economic impact of a direct tax on the high-income individual is much greater.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 12:43 pm to stout
I have never liked these economic stimulus or whatever you call it things... It just makes service providers/suppliers charge more....
Posted on 11/9/25 at 12:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
COVID bailouts, for example.
Sure
But an economic stimulus like this just quickly finds its way back to Walmart, target, Amazon or whoever. Hopefully it can help some local businesses also.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 12:57 pm to stout
What exactly is that number for annual income for "High-Income Earners"? I have to see an actual number mentioned anywhere?
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News