- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:15 am to ChiGator
Youre dumb.
Sure, any change in any economic metric will have some sort of negative effect in some unproven category TEMPORARILY.
Sure, any change in any economic metric will have some sort of negative effect in some unproven category TEMPORARILY.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:16 am to ChiGator
Back in the late 1960's, I remember there were hundreds of textile mills that had been thriving for over 100 years all over the South. In what is now Soho in NYC, there were a great many sweat shops making clothes of all kinds.
Then, the tariffs on Indian textiles were dropped. Over a couple of years, all of that domestic production vanished.
The good news for me was that I was able to rent a former textile/sweat shop loft of 3000 sq. ft. for $500 a month.
Then, the tariffs on Indian textiles were dropped. Over a couple of years, all of that domestic production vanished.
The good news for me was that I was able to rent a former textile/sweat shop loft of 3000 sq. ft. for $500 a month.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:19 am to wackatimesthree
Well, they can pay increased labor costs, or pay the tariffs, or sell less product. Those are the options, currently and the near future at least.
Or....and hear me out for a second...
Maybe all parties involved can just stop the silliness and drop all tariffs.
Or....and hear me out for a second...
Maybe all parties involved can just stop the silliness and drop all tariffs.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:21 am to ChiGator
quote:
A competent administration would have provided companies incentives over time to make moves abroad before being hit with tarrifs.
There may be some truth here. I mean, Clinton definitely provided incentive the other way for manufacturing to leave, and it only took a couple decades for us to become a service and tick-tock economy. We make nothing anymore.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:23 am to wackatimesthree
Haven't seen the massive price increases that panicans here predicted...
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:24 am to deuceiswild
quote:
Well, they can pay increased labor costs, or pay the tariffs, or sell less product. Those are the options, currently and the near future at least.
Sure, and each of those choices has negative consequences. None of them are neutral toward the economy. Again, you can't draw water out of one side of the pool. When you suck money out of a system, there is a reaction inside the system. It might be that raises and hiring gets frozen. It might be the cancellation of expansion. It might be the company's stock goes down as the company becomes less profitable. It might be that the company has to raise prices to pay the tariffs or the increased labor costs.
But something has to happen to offset the action. It can't not.
quote:
Maybe all parties involved can just stop the silliness and drop all tariffs.
Sure. I've said that from the outset. If the point of the tariffs was to force other countries to drop them, sure, fine.
But number one, that hasn't happened. And number two, that goal is diametrically opposed to at least two other stated goals for the tariffs in the first place.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:25 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Haven't seen the massive price increases that panicans here predicted..
I seem to have already made a post about you and exactly what you would say. It's up close to the beginning of the thread.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:26 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
And number two, that goal is diametrically opposed to at least two other stated goals for the tariffs in the first place.
No, it isn't. If there's one thing Trump has been consistent on... and by consistent, I mean since the 80s, it's tariffs.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:29 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Look, I don't mind raising taxes to pay down the debt IF we also cut spending.
This is my major sticking point, I would be OK paying more in taxes if i was 100% certain that the money would not be pissed away on stupid stuff. but that will unfortunately never happen.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:30 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Sure. I've said that from the outset. If the point of the tariffs was to force other countries to drop them, sure, fine. But number one, that hasn't happened.
That doesn't mean it won't happen. Tariffs aren't a catastrophic economic event that moves things in a week or a month. Plus, countries have ways they can try and offset or fight them or lessen their effects. It takes a while to sink in.
You may turn out right in the end. But I'm not ready to say they're a failure yet.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:33 am to deuceiswild
quote:
Or....and hear me out for a second...
Maybe all parties involved can just stop the silliness and drop all tariffs.
That's not what MAGA wants. To them, cheap labor is unfair and we shouldn't have to compete with it regardless of tariff status.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:36 am to deuceiswild
quote:
No, it isn't. If there's one thing Trump has been consistent on... and by consistent, I mean since the 80s, it's tariffs.
Then explain to me this.
If the tariffs result in everyone dropping their tariffs, including us, what now is the mechanism for replacing the income tax with tariff revenue (one stated goal), and what now is the leverage for forcing manufacturing back to the US (another stated goal)?
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:40 am to deuceiswild
quote:
Tariffs aren't a catastrophic economic event that moves things in a week or a month.
Yeah, we covered this, remember?
Trump has 1,016 days left in office. No country is going to drop tariffs in the next 1,016 days.
Why?
Because they have an excellent chance that on day 1,017 the tariffs disappear like a fart in the wind or at least get reduced down to something workable for them.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:46 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:Yes, it is
Is the scale of that graph purposely meant to be misleading?
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:46 am to ChiGator
According to Bureau of Labor Statistics..
Consumer prices in the U.S. rose by 7.0% from 2021
8.0% in 2022, the highest annual increase in decades,
3.4% in 2023
2.9% in 2024
2.7% in 2025
And 3.3% so far in 2026, with energy spiking it currently.
Costts go up, never come down. Chinese and other foreigners are still making money off of us, even with Tariffs.
An indicator is the NY real estate market. 3-7 million dollar listings in Manhattan are in high demand. Foreigners are gobbling them up. If you are renting high end apartment in NYC, there is a good chance your landlord is in China.
Consumer prices in the U.S. rose by 7.0% from 2021
8.0% in 2022, the highest annual increase in decades,
3.4% in 2023
2.9% in 2024
2.7% in 2025
And 3.3% so far in 2026, with energy spiking it currently.
Costts go up, never come down. Chinese and other foreigners are still making money off of us, even with Tariffs.
An indicator is the NY real estate market. 3-7 million dollar listings in Manhattan are in high demand. Foreigners are gobbling them up. If you are renting high end apartment in NYC, there is a good chance your landlord is in China.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:46 am to ChiGator
Im confused, according to this chart, inflation should have been negative 5% the first half of 2025, did I miss that number from the BLS?
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:47 am to Flats
quote:
To them, cheap labor is unfair
Even once it's explained to them that in the context of any given country's economy, the labor isn't even particularly cheap...only in the context of ours.
The average Chinese factory worker who makes $6 an hour very likely lives better on that wage than the average factory worker who makes $17 an hour here.
But you move that manufacturing back here and the producer is now looking at 3 x the labor costs.
It works just fine for everyone involved—the net benefit to everyone is greater, in fact—or the Chinese worker to make her $6 an hour there and for the American producer to pay $6 an hour labor.
But Trump says things like, "We're being taken advantage of," and they believe it.
*As I have always said, it's true that we need certain items manufactured here for national security reasons. But we don't need tariffs to accomplish that goal. Just contract with civilian companies that are already here to produce whatever is needed for NS.
MAGA thinks we don't produce anything here anymore. We're still 2nd in the world in manufacturing, behind only China.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:47 am to deuceiswild
quote:
No, it isn't. If there's one thing Trump has been consistent on... and by consistent, I mean since the 80s, it's tariffs.
He may have been consistent in pushing them but his claimed reasons/goals are all over the place and frequently contradictory.
Posted on 4/10/26 at 11:54 am to ChiGator
Once again, OP starts a thread in bad faith with an extremely misleading graph.
We get it, Iran isn't working out the way you hoped. Time to take a break from grooming kids and wishing death on American troops to start another thread that leads with a blatant lie.
We get it, Iran isn't working out the way you hoped. Time to take a break from grooming kids and wishing death on American troops to start another thread that leads with a blatant lie.
Popular
Back to top


0





