- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hamas announces Iran will now be their ‘largest backer’ of military and financial aid
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:18 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:18 pm to cajunangelle
That's an informative article. thanks.
Placeholder until a more comprehensive plan can be put in place.
Placeholder until a more comprehensive plan can be put in place.
This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 10:19 pm
1
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:21 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Trump has no tools at his disposal to rescind the deal in practice?
rescind what?
the deal was Obozo gave them cash and wont monitor them.
What can trump rescind?
seriously.
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:22 pm to CptBengal
Certifying precludes snapback sanctions. CA posted a good article on the last page about the mechanisms
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Are those not valid questions?
Can we not ask why Trump has continued a deal for 8 months that he railed against for two years?
At some point you'll have to stop being mindless fan boys and answer some questions for yourself.
and what do you suggest he do??????????????
do you think they will return the $450 billion in cash we delivered to them on a pallet????????????
come on, we are waiting for your wonderful wisdome to explain just WTF can trump do now "after the fact"? they got everything up front.
so if we cancel the deal, that in fact never was a deal, but and outright surrender to them, then even the smallest semblence of anything we got from the deal, will be gone, even though about all we get out of it, is some fake inspections, and fraudulent monitoring that they themselves control
This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:27 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That's an informative article. thanks.
Placeholder until a more comprehensive plan can be put in place.
boosie are you turning into an unbiased pugilist?
Posted on 8/29/17 at 10:28 pm to MButterfly
What an unworthy POTUS he was. Borderline traitor.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 12:51 am to keakar
quote:I heard it was $100 trillion. Might as well go all in if we are going to make up numbers.
do you think they will return the $450 billion in cash we delivered to them on a pallet????????????
Posted on 8/30/17 at 4:39 am to MButterfly
Thank you Barack HUSSEIN Obama, you fricking disgrace to humanity.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 5:26 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is the Iran deal going to be Trump's version of Obama's Gitmo?
Run your mouth as a candidate but get the super secret info as HNIC and realize this is actually the best option?
I think Trump has certified compliance two or three times. Why not simply tear the deal up day one?
There is no deal here.
Obama gave everything away. We actually have zero recourse if they don't comply.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 6:34 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is the Iran deal going to be Trump's version of Obama's Gitmo?
Why don't you keep up with the fricking news?
TRUMP TARGETING IRAN DEALyou keep up with the fricking news?
Posted on 8/30/17 at 7:02 am to keakar
Breitbart agrees with obama. 150billion.
Not 450billion.
Ps. Huckabee opines 5 trillion.
Not 450billion.
Ps. Huckabee opines 5 trillion.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 7:03 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 7:09 am to MButterfly
I thought the ayatollah was major backer for years.
I believe so. Assad no longer major contributor; hamas giving props to remaining meddlers.
I believe so. Assad no longer major contributor; hamas giving props to remaining meddlers.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 7:11 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 7:17 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
You might want to do some fact finding before making an arse of yourself (and then upvoting your arse making skills).
Trump can't do anything but sanction Iran and even with that, Obama probably wrote a clause in there saying that we can't do that. The Iranians made obama their bitch during those negotiations. obama shouldve stuck with organize bbqs and free cell phone drives in the community.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 8:42 am to Loserman
quote:
There is no deal here.
Obama gave everything away. We actually have zero recourse if they don't comply.
That's not the problem with the deal. The problem is that it was written in a way that allows room for varying interpretations. Meaning the US could feasibly argue that Iran isn't following it while Iran can feasibly argue that they are. It's the kind of deal that functions more like a pretext to war thanna truly diplomatic action. I'm fairly confident that wasn't unintentional.
The US has sanctioned Iran for decades and nothing good comes from it. Probably the only notable impact of the sanctions has been to completely isolated Iran from US diplomatic akd economic efforts and policy. The snap back provisions would really only matter if Iranians are allowed to build enough economic activity around the lifted sanctions that it will matter if it "snaps back". We aren't even close to that now. In fact, we were closer to it in the sanctions riddled Bush and Ahmadinajad era than we ever were under Obama or trump.
The US primary leverage over Iran is via potential kinetic action like airstrikes or ground war or subversion of their regional operations. The latter being something the US has failed miserably at since 2001. In fact Iran is far more influential since 2001. Which is hilarious.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 8:51 am to MButterfly
Iran is fricking flush now, so, why not?
Posted on 8/30/17 at 8:56 am to gthog61
quote:
TRUMP TARGETING IRAN DEALyou keep up with the fricking news?
Tillerson has been exposed. He is a dead man walking. Trump can't replace him soon enough.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News