- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gun Control Discussion
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:15 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:15 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
And yet somehow never bothered to learn what a statistic was. They forget to teach you about statistics during your '2 engineering degrees'?
You can't even properly define it. You linked fricking Merriam-Webster, sport.
quote:
Look, I'm done here.
Of course you are.
quote:
You've demonstrated once again that you lack the basic capacity to debate this in a coherent manner. You rely on pretending you said something you didn't, pretending that an answered question was never answered, and falling back on saying "up doesn't really equal up, it equals down - check the dictionary" when you're exposed.
None of that is true. My posts are still there, and anyone can go look at them. What they'll see is yet another BamaAtl beat down, courtesy of DisplacedBuckeye.
Have fun driving your "manual sports car" that you paid for with your inflated salary, on your way to "help" the underprivileged.
fricking hypocrite.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I'm convinced bitchatl is just completely blind to reality.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:21 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You can't even properly define it. You linked fricking Merriam-Webster,
I linked a dictionary to define for you a word you don't understand, and somehow that's my problem....okay, champ.
quote:
My posts are still there, and anyone can go look at them
And I'm sure when they need to laugh at the clown, they'll take a gander.
I notice that you stopped pressing about the "CDC Study" once I pointed out how rat-fricking stupid you were for asking for analysis on it. Good job on learning that, at least.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:23 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I linked a dictionary to define for you a word you don't understand, and somehow that's my problem....okay, champ.
Your definition worked in my favor, not yours, sport.
quote:
I notice that you stopped pressing about the "CDC Study"
No I didn't.
Would you like to discuss it now? I'm ready when you are.
quote:
analysis
Did you add this to the list?
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:24 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
And I'm sure when they need to laugh at the clown, they'll take a gander.
Don't worry. We do. I'm just afraid we aren't laughing WITH you.... We're laughing AT you.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:26 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Your definition worked in my favor
It really didn't. You were saying that survey data didn't compromise a valid statistic, when that's the very definition of a statistic.
quote:
Would you like to discuss it now? I'm ready when you are
I already gave you the answer. The fact that you're still leading with this shows that you can't discuss it.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:26 pm to beerJeep
quote:
We do.
Me, too. I love coming back to see DB get his senile arse kicked!
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Element, something element.
I already gave you the answer. The fact that you're still leading with this shows that you can't discuss it.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:27 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It really didn't. You were saying that survey data didn't compromise a valid statistic, when that's the very definition of a statistic.
That isn't what I said.
quote:
I already gave you the answer. The fact that you're still leading with this shows that you can't discuss it.
Your answers so far have been "I'm waiting on Clames" and "you're not capable of having the discussion."
I'll take my chances. Let's discuss it.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:28 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I love coming back to see DB get his senile arse kicked!
Let's do a survey.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:28 pm to Jbird
quote:
Element
That's it.
Muh Element!
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:29 pm to BamaAtl
BamaAtl, I enjoy your posts in these threads even though I do not agree.
Personally, what do you think is the "political limit" on gun control legislation in America. In other words, which type of legislation do you think is probably not politically possible, at least right now?
As you know, politics is the art of the possible. No matter what the studies say, you can't wave a wand and pass legislation with the snap of the fingers.
Personally, what do you think is the "political limit" on gun control legislation in America. In other words, which type of legislation do you think is probably not politically possible, at least right now?
As you know, politics is the art of the possible. No matter what the studies say, you can't wave a wand and pass legislation with the snap of the fingers.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:38 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Let's do a survey.
You're not capable of designing an unbiased one, champ.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:39 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Your answers so far have been "I'm waiting on Clames" and "you're not capable of having the discussion."
You missed the post where I explained to you why asking for my analysis on a document intended as a starting point for research questions was ignorant.
Maybe go study that one a bit.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:39 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Element he is out of it.
Maybe go study that one a bit.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
You're not capable of designing an unbiased one, champ.
Here's a real simple one.
Up vote if DB won. Downvote if bamaATL won.
Not sure how this is a biased poll. But ohhhhkay
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Personally, what do you think is the "political limit" on gun control legislation in America. In other words, which type of legislation do you think is probably not politically possible, at least right now?
Honestly? I don't think any legislation is possible. The GOP is owned by the NRA, and is willing to let children die in schools, churches, and in the streets in order to keep that spigot of money going. If we were unable to do anything after Sandy Hook, what the hell makes you think Vegas or Sutherland Springs will change any minds?
quote:
As you know, politics is the art of the possible
Part of politics is making the impossible possible through extensive pressure. Obama's election was impossible, until it wasn't. The Civil Rights movement was impossible, until it wasn't. Hell, the ACA was impossible, until it wasn't.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:41 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
You're not capable of designing an unbiased one, champ.
You are more partisan that Displaced by a wide margin. He pisses off everyone. You stick to your talking points. He probably isn't the right poster to accuse of bias. Of course, you of all people, should never accuse anyone of bias.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
and in the streets in order to keep that spigot of money going.
Dems filibustered a bill that would have prevented the shooting because they wanted more. Fact is...they had a chance to do something and they refused. Filibustered. So pipe down with the histrionics. Your party could have stopped the texas shooting and didn't.
Posted on 11/7/17 at 10:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Honestly? I don't think any legislation is possible. The GOP is owned by the NRA, and is willing to let children die in schools, churches, and in the streets in order to keep that spigot of money going. If we were unable to do anything after Sandy Hook, what the hell makes you think Vegas or Sutherland Springs will change any minds?
I should have been more clear, but what do you think is the median voter's limit on gun control legislation that they would support? Let's say dems had the senate, the house, and the presidency. Which type of legislation could they pass that wouldn't result in political anger from median voters?
Popular
Back to top



2




