- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Great read on Twitter about the reality of NN
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:20 am
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:20 am
LINK
quote:
Net Neutrality didn't even take effect until last year. It was suspended by Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, earlier this year.
The purpose of Net Neutrality is to take regulatory oversight of the Internet out of the FTC's hands and hand it over to the FCC.
The FCC is, of course, responsible for behaving as a moral authority, censoring and fining any entity in its jurisdiction pretty much whenever they feel like it.
The FCC does NOT have strict consumer privacy protection requirements.
The FTC does. This is important.
Not only that, but by considering the Internet a "common carrier", the government gets to dictate how ISPs run their businesses and how they offer service to customers.
There never was, never has been, and never will be an issue of ISPs "deciding what sites you can visit".
That's not just a myth - it's a deliberate lie.
ISPs do manage bandwidth and network traffic, but that's not about capitulating to the highest bidder - it's about ensuring a minimum level of service for all subscribers.
If we needed Net Neutrality, Comcast wouldn't be *throttling* Netflix in the evening.
If anything, they'd be *prioritizing* Netflix traffic, because guess who has enough money to pay off Comcast for preferential treatment? Oh yeah...Netflix.
This isn't about protecting your actual rights.
It's not about "keeping the Internet free and open".
The Internet IS free and open.
You think Comcast is bad now, how do you think it will pan out if the government forces Comcast to treat all network traffic exactly the same?
Instead of parts of the Internet sucking for a small subset of subscribers, the entire Internet will suck for everyone! Why?
Because regulatory burden isn't going to force Comcast to upgrade their network infrastructure.
The only strategy that will actually have an impact on the ISP monopoly is deregulation.
It's become prohibitively expensive to start your own ISP, and now nobody is willing to stand up to the behemoths of Comcast and Time-Warner and AT&T and Verizon.
Except, that is, Google...and we all know why Google started its own fiber optic service.
(Hint: it's not because they're such great guys.)
If you still don't understand what I'm getting at, think of it this way: Heavy vehicles are treated differently from light vehicles on public roads.
Most (if not all) states have DOT laws prohibiting vehicles over 10,000 lbs GVW (gross vehicle weight), and...
...slow-moving vehicles in the passing lane on highways with three or more lanes.
Additionally, heavy vehicles are generally required to pay higher tolls at toll roads, bridges, and interchanges.
Why is this? It's pretty simple.
Left lane restrictions on highways exist to keep the flow of traffic moving consistently and efficiently.
By prohibiting semis and trailers and slow traffic in the left lane, other drivers can pass through more quickly.
If these laws didn't exist, you'd see semis and dump trucks and RVs and whatnot in the left lane, holding up traffic for everyone else.
Kind of like what would happen if NN were enforced & Comcast couldn't manage their bandwidth to ensure the fast-moving traffic (like people checking email or ranting on Twitter) can get through without being held up by the bigger traffic (like you marathoning GoT in 4k).
What about tolls? It's the same idea - heavy vehicles cause more wear and damage to roadways.
Thus, when tolls are implemented with the goal being to augment funding for the toll's roadway, heavy vehicles have to pay more $$, because they impact roadways more than cars.
Kind of like how ISPs negotiate agreements with major bandwidth consumers (like Netflix and Hulu) to offset the significantly higher bandwidth consumption incurred by those services.
The world is not ending because Net Neutrality is going away.
NN didn't exist before 2016, and the Internet was chugging along just fine without it.
We don't need more government regulation over the Internet.
We need less.
Minor correction, because I am old and losing track of time. #NetNeutrality took effect in 2015, not 2016. Either way, it's a relatively new regulation and has only had a negative impact on the Internet due to ISPs scaling back network expansion since it took effect.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:30 am to stout
Reads like it was written for a second grader by a corporate shill attorney.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:31 am to stout
It literally sets the foundation for the chinese style government controlled internet that can be politicized and weaponized.
People need to wake up if they think NN is a good thing.
People need to wake up if they think NN is a good thing.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:32 am to stout
Excellent, thanks for posting.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 7:33 am to stout
That was fricking on point. Too bad none of our morons on this board will grasp it
Posted on 11/22/17 at 9:28 am to stout
If you love government regulation and all of its unseen costs, then youll love NN.
In order to see whats really going on, you need to understand rate-of-return regulations. The usual well-intentioned road to hell that government busybodies just cant resist. Tale as old as time (1887 Interstate Commerce Act.)
This article and the links within explain rate-of-return.
LINK
This is all about interfering in the market process in the name of "fairness" and "consumer protection". These words should warn you that your freedom is being eroded and that big bullies are suppressing the little guys and innovators.
In order to see whats really going on, you need to understand rate-of-return regulations. The usual well-intentioned road to hell that government busybodies just cant resist. Tale as old as time (1887 Interstate Commerce Act.)
This article and the links within explain rate-of-return.
LINK
This is all about interfering in the market process in the name of "fairness" and "consumer protection". These words should warn you that your freedom is being eroded and that big bullies are suppressing the little guys and innovators.
Popular
Back to top

8









