- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:10 am to The Maj
quote:
Dims didn't give two shits about any of the Epstein crap until recently.
Exactly my point... If a list does exist, I really don't think they know what they are asking for which leads me to believe the "list" doesn't really exist and they are doing their usual grandstanding...
I think a list of sorts does exist and it's in Ghislane Maxwell's head. If you really want to see the FBI/DOJ squirm have a reputable reporter/journalist ask Kash Patel and Pam Bondi where are all the surveillance vids and the meta data from Epstein and Maxwell's smart phones/devices and the meta data of those who traveled on Epstein's jet and visited Fantasy Island.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:16 am to VOLhalla
Epstein's only clients were intel agencies. Everyone else in his "little black book" were targets for information, influence or black mail.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:18 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
it's in Ghislane Maxwell's head
Yeah, I would question the validity of this list or at least the completeness of such a list...
quote:
meta data from Epstein and Maxwell's smart phones/devices and the meta data of those who traveled on Epstein's jet and visited Fantasy Island
I didn't say evidence didn't exist, I said "the list" may not exist as in a ready made list suitable for publishing...
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No, that's not what he said
It’s the same straw man that Bondi is using.
“The government is never going to release the video tapes of children being sexually assaulted.”
Well, no shite, that’s not what people want.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:23 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
The government shouldn't be releasing child porn.
If only they had editing software to blur the sensitive parts and teenager identifies. God knows I’ve seen more of Hunter Biden than I ever wished to see
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:31 am to Rebel
quote:
Because you can’t just release a bunch of names implying everyone is a pedo.
You can. I don’t care if they’re all pedos either, if anyone looked the other way or profited from the scheme — they are just as guilty.
In fact, the idea of a non-pedophile enabling pedophiles so as to enrich themselves with money or power is just as repulsive as pedophilia itself.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
There's no excuse. My comment was simply that I would also vote against some addition to a law that vaguely requires the release of Epstein files. They should be specific in what they want released.
Why are you so pissy about by comment
Your first comment literally implies this law could or would allow for the release of CP.
quote:
My view on this would depend on how vague the language was. The government shouldn't be releasing child porn.
My comment was simply to ease your mind that there is absolutely no law congress could pass that would result in the release of CP without congress having to amend the current criminal statutes related to CP. You are getting worked up over something that literally cannot happen unless congress explicitly amends those federal statutes.
My comment isn't an editorial about whether this law should or shouldn't be passed. I make ZERO comment on whether it would be good or bad. Read my comments a few times since I think you are imagining things are in my comment when they are not.
I'm done with my fruitless attempt to help you grasp that. Stay salty about it if you want.
Later.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:36 am to VOLhalla
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:41 am to Chorizo chang
quote:
If only they had editing software to blur the sensitive parts and teenager identifies. God knows I’ve seen more of Hunter Biden than I ever wished to see
That wasn't released by the government.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:41 am to PeleofAnalytics
Again, they are saying it's ALL child porn. It is very possible we have already seen every document that isn’t.
This post was edited on 7/15/25 at 10:42 am
Posted on 7/15/25 at 10:44 am to VOLhalla
It’s mind blowing how bad the GOP has played this 50/50 issue.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 11:05 am to Chorizo chang
quote:
If only they had editing software to blur the sensitive parts and teenager identifies.
To be fair, under the Georgia Open Records Act, none of a child molestation case can be released to the public. No amount of redaction/masking can be done in order to make contents of the case releasable.
This post was edited on 7/15/25 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 7/15/25 at 11:09 am to VOLhalla
Uniparty votes...
Posted on 7/15/25 at 11:13 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
My view on this would depend on how vague the language was. The government shouldn't be releasing child porn.
If only the government was allowed to release redacted information.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News