- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goldman Responds To Court Block Of Trump Tariffs: Nothingburger, White House Can Sidestep
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:48 am to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:48 am to Pandy Fackler
Judge Nap? … really?
1
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:50 am to cadillacattack
quote:
Judge Nap? … really?
It's a video. It's worth watching I suppose. Give it a watch and see.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:51 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Projection can be degrading. You're projecting.
Bite me. I learned statutory interpretation in law school under Antonin Scalia. It's not a question of what you WANT the law to say, it's a question of what the law says.
The Liberation Day tariffs are clear violations of IEEPA. Maybe they can be justified under other authorities. I don't know, but the article cited by OP makes a compelling case that they can be. Huzzah
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:54 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
It's a video. It's worth watching I suppose. Give it a watch and see.
It was informative and shows that the Court procedure wasn't any kind of "judicial coup."
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:55 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
learned statutory interpretation in law school under Antonin Scalia
Is that where you learned to defend illegal gang members due process
We have another dipshite "lawyer" on here. The Law offices of SFP, Billmatt and Boosie. Top lawyers that spend ALL day on tigrrdroppings
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:55 am to IvoryBillMatt
Wait, you went to Law School?! Now it all makes sense, we have another resident “legal scholar” extolling on us the virtues of the Judiciary lol it’s like clockwork with you people
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:56 am to SDVTiger
And are wrong 99% of the time. TDS is a helluva drug
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:58 am to SDVTiger
quote:
that spend ALL day on tigrrdroppings
might want to sit this one out
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:58 am to Rip Torn
quote:
Wait, you went to Law School?! Now it all makes sense, we have another resident “legal scholar” extolling on us the virtues of the Judiciary lol it’s like clockwork with you people
You don't hate them enough. The "law" is screwing around with jargon to run up hours.
No matter how this turns out, lawyers will be making money. That is all that matters to them.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:58 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
And are wrong 99% of the time. TDS is a helluva drug
Its amazing
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:00 am to cadillacattack
quote:
This will be easily overturned … don’t like it? …. get better lawyers …
Courts can only examine evidence that's in the record. Were those reports admitted into evidence? If not, don't lecture me about "better lawyers."
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:01 am to SDVTiger
You have to excuse Ivory, only the best and brightest can get into and pass law school like Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and Letitia.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:03 am to Rip Torn
Ivory = Hank … ?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:03 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
It was informative and shows that the Court procedure wasn't any kind of "judicial coup."
I thought it was an interesting enough vid. All the guy did was lay out the arguments. According to the TV judge, this will be appealed directly to the US Supreme Court.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:05 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
You don't hate them enough.
Hate all you want. If we don't govern our Republic through the rule of law, what's your alternative?
Aren't you glad that the Bill of Rights protects your God-given freedoms?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:06 am to cadillacattack
Ivory has that unique combination of trying to appear non partisan while consistently siding with one particular persuasion while pretending to be the other in principle. It’s a trait that seems to be ingrained in law school
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:07 am to Rip Torn
quote:
You have to excuse Ivory, only the best and brightest can get into and pass law school like Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and Letitia
i knew he was a fraud when he wouldnt stop defending the maryland man like SFP quote:
Ivory = Hank … ?
Yes
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:08 am to IvoryBillMatt
It’s funny how the “rule of law” only seems to apply to certain politicians. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison would be so proud!!
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:11 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
How was I wrong? Wanting the Constitution and laws followed is an inherently conservative position. The President needs better lawyers.
We are way beyond the Constitution my friend, especially when it comes to executive power. Both Roosevelts and Wilson did away with that pesky document (pun intended) while Congress, the courts and the people just watched.
People only use the Constitution has a hammer or shield when they want to get something but we are way off that document unfortunately.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:11 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:As I said, projection can be degrading. You're projecting.
It's not a question of what you WANT the law to say, it's a question of what the law says.
Page 3 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News