- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Giuliani to Release Trump Rebuttal Within Hours of Release of Full Mueller Report
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:39 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:39 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Nothing should be said in rebuttal.
A short "haha, told you so" would be epic.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:39 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Dems see no exoneration. The report will be used, regardless of content, to damage Trump.
I can see writing up a rebuttal to Democrats who use the report to try to damage Trump, but writing a rebuttal to a report that completely exonerates you is odd to me.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:41 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
but writing a rebuttal to a report that completely exonerates you is odd to me.
Report does not "completely exonerate Trump."
Hence the need for spin.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:44 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Why would Trump need a rebuttal against a document that completely exonerates him?
Got a firm grasp on things, dontcha?
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:44 pm to CelticDog
there is no such thing as “complete exoneration” in legal world
There is either exoneration or prosecution
If there is not sufficient evidence to bring a charge, you are assumed innocent under our laws.
There is either exoneration or prosecution
If there is not sufficient evidence to bring a charge, you are assumed innocent under our laws.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:45 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
I'll go ahead and say what we should be seeing tomorrow:
"Not only did I do nothing illegal, but THIS a-hole former president did XYZ and this report has said evidence in it to make those claims. I am officially requesting an investigation into this matter and will cram his smug smile and dumbo ears farther than michelle ever got her dick in that arse."
My version could use a little clean up, but you get the idea.
And libs are dumber than I thought if they think Barr isn't waiting on Go.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:45 pm to CelticDog
And again . . . that's not how the legal system works. People are not exonerated in our system of justice. You are either charged with a crime, or you are a free and innocent citizen with all of your God given rights. GET IT?!!!
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:46 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Thanks . . . you beat me to it!
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:46 pm to bamarep
quote:
want CRIMINAL indictments from our DOJ against those that tried to subvert an open and free election. It's so fricking obvious Ray fricking Charles could do the Grand Jury presentations for the prosecution.
Not. Going. To. Happen.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:46 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Then after the report is out, guliani just deletes the parts that Mueller did not catch on to.
SO that's how it's going to go. Got it.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:52 pm to BamaNixon
Because his opponents are the same liars who gloated afterwards about lying about romney’s Taxes?
You actually believe if he said nothing that the report would be treated fairly?
You actually believe if he said nothing that the report would be treated fairly?
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:53 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Why would anyone rebut a report that says you're innocent?
That's like the defendant objecting to a not-guilty verdict.
I'd guess that its more like a defendant reacting to a not-guilty verdict with something like this....
"I've been saying this whole time that I was not guilty. I tried explaining the whole situation to the police but as it turns out the police chief and the DA have been having a homosexual relationship (very nasty) and knew that I had the goods to expose their butt pirating so they colluded to frame me. They wanted to frame me because while they were riding each other's hershey highway I was nailing both of their wives. (Both women are now very satisfied, just look at the size of these hands)
I demand they be fired immediately and jailed for abuse of power and prosecutorial misconduct. Oh, and tell the democrats that I am hearing reports that they are colluding with China to steal the election so my team and I will be returning the favor, errr I mean investigating it fully."
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:53 pm to Jjdoc
What is there to rebut? If it's a full exoneration of the President, as he's claimed, he should be able to let it stand on its own.
Except that obviously he was lying when he claimed that.
Except that obviously he was lying when he claimed that.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 2:59 pm to Jjdoc
If Trump stuck his foot out one day to Comey, the Dems will say that is convincing evidence of obstruction
Posted on 4/17/19 at 3:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
there is no such thing as “complete exoneration” in legal world
There is either exoneration or prosecution
If there is not sufficient evidence to bring a charge, you are assumed innocent under our laws.
“There was no collusion with Russia. There was no obstruction, and — none whatsoever,” Trump said. “And it was a complete and total exoneration. It’s a shame that our country had to go through this.”
It's not like I made up the term "complete exoneration," so I assume you are attacking the words of POTUS.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 3:04 pm to Jeff Boomhauer
quote:
"I've been saying this whole time that I was not guilty. I tried explaining the whole situation to the police but as it turns out the police chief and the DA have been having a homosexual relationship (very nasty) and knew that I had the goods to expose their butt pirating so they colluded to frame me. They wanted to frame me because while they were riding each other's hershey highway I was nailing both of their wives. (Both women are now very satisfied, just look at the size of these hands)
This is some weird stuff right here.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 3:07 pm to BamaNixon
I’m attacking anyone who employs the term
As for obstruction, it would be extremely difficult to prove it in court because there was no underlying crime.
As for obstruction, it would be extremely difficult to prove it in court because there was no underlying crime.
Posted on 4/17/19 at 3:09 pm to BamaAtl
Again, you are BY DEFINITION exonerated if you are not prosecuted. It’s a legal term.
If trump were to go around saying “the report completely says nothing bad about me”, that will likely be misleading.
If trump were to go around saying “the report completely says nothing bad about me”, that will likely be misleading.
Popular
Back to top


0








