Started By
Message

re: Germany demolishes their newest coal-fired power plant. Only 6 yrs old.

Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:49 pm to
We have pretty much converted all of them in this country…. I don’t think a coal fired plant exists in Alabama any longer…. Converted to natural gas or scuttled…
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
6978 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Going to have humans running in hamster wheels to generate the power?

Humanster wheels?
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22475 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:59 pm to
They're going out of their way to freeze next winter.
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2320 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:10 pm to
They also just accepted it when Biden auto penned the order to blow up their pipeline. But climate change!!!!
Posted by HighlyFavoredTiger
La
Member since Jun 2018
970 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:13 pm to
While it’s understandable to question and ridicule Germany for demolishing a large 6 year old coal burning power plant, American citizens need to look in the mirror before we get too critical of others.
POWER magazine reported in February of this year that 780 coal burners have been shut down in America since 2000 and you can be assured that many of those had 10 to 20 more years of life ahead of them and we are on course to close half of the coal burners that still exist in America by 2026.
This continues to destabilize the nation’s power grid and needs to be reconsidered by the current administration, realistically Germany and the rest of the world are probably laughing at us for shutting down generation that is powered by our most abundant resource.
Posted by AquaAg84
Member since May 2013
3874 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:27 pm to
And Germans in DE will continue to be lemmings sorting recyclables religiously while their country gets taken over by migrants' and there is no power to fuel ordinary day to day activities. Dumbasses all.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Need to push Nuclear as safe, sustainable energy


Germany bids farewell to its last nuclear plants, eyes hydrogen future

quote:

“Nuclear power remains a risky technology, and in the end, the risks can’t be controlled even in a high-tech country like Germany,” Environment Minister Steffi Lemke said at a news conference ahead of the shutdown.

She cited the disaster at Japan’s Fukushima atomic power plant in 2011, when a tsunami knocked out the power supply leading to a catastrophic meltdown, evoking memories of the 1986 disaster at Chernobyl that remains a pivotal event for Germany’s anti-nuclear movement.

For the past 12 years, Krone and others have worked to convince public and private partners to invest in what they hope will be a key green fuel of the future. The region already produces more renewable energy than it consumes and aims to become a hub for hydrogen production using wind and solar power in the coming years.

“We have the big advantage that all the infrastructure, the networks, are there,” he said.

One of the world’s biggest clean hydrogen production facilities is due to begin operating in Lingen this fall. Some of it will be used to make “green steel,” a vital step if Europe’s biggest economy wants to become carbon neutral by 2045.
Posted by Chief One Word
Eastern Washington State
Member since Mar 2018
4254 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:38 pm to
Germany will be Islam and muzzles without power.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58200 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:45 pm to
As Nietzsche wrote, the German capacity for self destruction is unparalleled
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36328 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:46 pm to
That is a weird video.

They pretty much just removed the muffler. What about the rest of the plant?
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36328 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

They couldn’t convert it to gas?


They could make it a FGD (flue gas desulfurizaztion unit but those aren't cheap. However, now that the stacks are gone they could build the desulfurizaztion plant and ball mills required to convert the gas and limestone into a gypsum slurry. Which would likely be more economical than demoing the entire plant. Let's see if they go full retard.
Posted by Allister Fiend
Member since Jan 2016
1070 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:47 pm to
Why wouldn’t you just mothball it if you didn’t want to use it? Hell, we still have transport ships sitting (mothball fleet) in the Neches River near Beaumont just in case we need to move military equipment.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6265 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:57 pm to
Even if you believe in the climate fearmongering, blowing up that plant just means importing energy from a country that creates it the same way, and then there is additional waste from having to import it in

And yes, they can say “green” energy - like the wind turbines which are butchering birds and can’t be recycled, or the solar panels which create boatloads of forever chemical waste in china

Why don’t these hippies support nuclear energy? Clean as it gets, and cost efficient
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12327 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Why don’t these hippies support nuclear energy? Clean as it gets, and cost efficient


Nuclear energy will be back. It’s inevitable.
Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4775 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 11:11 pm to
This post was edited on 4/12/25 at 1:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram