- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
GEOTUS has the same approval rating as Obozo with 93% negative coverage
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:31 pm
How scared are the media right now? They cant make him worse than their messiah.
Is this the reason for increasing censorship online? To take back control of the narrative they've lost?
Is this the reason for increasing censorship online? To take back control of the narrative they've lost?
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:34 pm to CptBengal
quote:
GEOTUS has the same approval rating as Obozo with 93% negative coverage
CNN: Polling numbers indicate clear rise in white supremacy in the US
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:35 pm to CptBengal
If you think this is scary for the DNC/MSM Political Complex, throw in their probable candidate the Beta!
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:40 pm to CptBengal
I don't buy for a second that the polls are accurate.
People have openly admitted that they're afraid to say they support or voted for Trump, citing fear of retaliation from the tolerant left.
I suspect his true, actual approval number is >60%.
People have openly admitted that they're afraid to say they support or voted for Trump, citing fear of retaliation from the tolerant left.
I suspect his true, actual approval number is >60%.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:41 pm to CptBengal
quote:
GEOTUS has the same approval rating as Obozo with 93% negative coverage
This is a truly amazing fact.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:43 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
don't buy for a second that the polls are accurate.
People have openly admitted that they're afraid to say they support or voted for Trump, citing fear of retaliation from the tolerant left.
I suspect his true, actual approval number is >60%.
Totally agree.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 11:38 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:We're talking about an anonymous poll here. No one is afraid of being outed.
People have openly admitted that they're afraid to say they support or voted for Trump, citing fear of retaliation from the tolerant left.
That's just another "fake news" response to anything not supporting the Trump narrative.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:30 am to CptBengal
you wrote 5 sentences and lied 3 times. I'm almost impressed.
1. Obama was at 48.1 at this point (day 789). trump is at 41.5.
2. That 93 percent thing was one group looking at the first 100 days only, and 'negative" can mean whatever they want it to. So not only is it horribly outdated, it was entirely subjective even back then.
3. No one is censoring conservative, grow up with your insane conspiracy theories.
1. Obama was at 48.1 at this point (day 789). trump is at 41.5.
2. That 93 percent thing was one group looking at the first 100 days only, and 'negative" can mean whatever they want it to. So not only is it horribly outdated, it was entirely subjective even back then.
3. No one is censoring conservative, grow up with your insane conspiracy theories.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 4:17 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:37 am to MastrShake
Can't figure out If you're a troll on here or just very dishonest
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:18 am to Jones
I gave you very specific and easily verifiable numbers. Reality is not trolling nor dishonest. You should try it.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:22 am to MastrShake
quote:
3. No one is censoring conservative
This is false
What percentage of coverage do you think is negative?
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 1:32 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:29 am to MastrShake
quote:lolz turn on any news network and tell me it isn't 90%+ negative
2. That 93 percent thing was one group looking at the first 100 days only, and 'negative" can mean whatever they want it to. So not only is it horribly outdated, it was entirely subjective even back then.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:36 am to Pelican fan99
quote:always entertaining to see the "facts not feelings" crowd INSTANTLY bail on that whenever it suits them.
lolz turn on any news network and tell me it isn't 90%+ negative
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:39 am to MastrShake
You are such a fairy arse wussie.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:45 am to Pelican fan99
quote:The Rupert Murdoch- owned Wall Street Journal's coverage of Trump is 70% negative.
lolz turn on any news network and tell me it isn't 90%+ negative
Maybe the problem is not the coverage but the one being covered.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:51 am to NIH
quote:
We're talking about an anonymous poll here. No one is afraid of being outed.
quote:It must suck to be so stupid that you can't even try to make a response to what was posted.
Cry harder
Keep up the good work, dumbass.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 1:54 am to texridder
What is stupid is forfeit your individual rights and tell socialists to define your rights. Moron.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 2:27 am to jessieventura9
quote:What is just as stupid is letting alt-right evangelistic authoritarians dictate your rights.
What is stupid is forfeit your individual rights and tell socialists to define your rights. Moron.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 3:40 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News