- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Funny... within 24 hours of the Epstein files, we had wall to wall breakdowns
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:26 am to Jbird
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:26 am to Jbird
quote:
Why would an FBI agent make that statement?
Valid question. Sounds like we need a lot more evidence to judge
You just argued my point. Thank you
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 8:27 am
1
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
So irrelevant at this time.
Nice
Nice
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:27 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
If I say that I’m railing your wife, your response is for me to give you specific positions.
Bad allusion attempt is bad
But I assume you're conceding you don't have any evidence to answer the question?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:27 am to Jbird
quote:
So irrelevant at this time.
No. That's not what it means. Do better.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
Of course.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you don't have any evidence to answer the question?
So a confession that wasn’t coerced isn’t good enough?
That’s an interesting take.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 8:31 am
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
The gbi fraud in Michigan the fbi hid.
They didn't hide anything. They investigated and it wasn't viable
Interesting you say that...
Because all of the "tips" about Trump were also determined to not be viable, yet that didn't stop the reporting about it.
Because, you see, THAT'S what my post was about: the clearly different treatment by the media of very similar document releases from the government.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:31 am to udtiger
Inb4 irrelevant.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
****DERAIL ALERT***
There is a literal BAG OF PAPER with INK.
Now if you're excusing peepeegate and russiarussiarussia hoax information...
Staying on track, the OP makes the greatest point. The MSM is not going to shine any light on their own corruption. They are connected. It is evident.
quote:
Because nobody cares outside of the most NPC of MAGA-types and there is very little meat on the proverbial bone.
There is a literal BAG OF PAPER with INK.
Now if you're excusing peepeegate and russiarussiarussia hoax information...
Staying on track, the OP makes the greatest point. The MSM is not going to shine any light on their own corruption. They are connected. It is evident.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:38 am to udtiger
quote:
Because all of the "tips" about Trump were also determined to not be viable, yet that didn't stop the reporting about it.
I brought this up the night of the speech. You're days late.
The Epstein story was something that the nation cared about. The irrationality and dishonesty you're posting about above was also not one-sided. Trump was a minor player in that story overall with all the people who had their lives derailed for simply being mentioned in the files (with no nefarious allegations).
Many threads were made on here counting scalps of those in the perceived out-groups who faced that fate.
quote:
Because, you see, THAT'S what my post was about: the clearly different treatment by the media of very similar document releases from the government.
People cared about the Epstein files across the population
People don't care about this election stuff in 2026
Go back to my LITERAL first words responding to your OP
quote:
Because nobody cares outside of the most NPC of MAGA-types and there is very little meat on the proverbial bone.
Had Trump come with something of substance (like the QTards believed), it may be different. But this was just another nothingburger over a story most of the country has tuned out due to 6 years of no direct, credible evidence and lots of nothingburgers.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
If I say that I’m railing your wife, your response is for me to give you specific positions.
Bad allusion attempt is bad
But I assume you're conceding you don't have any evidence to answer the question?
The word you're looking for is "analogy"
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:40 am to BestBanker
quote:
Now if you're excusing peepeegate and russiarussiarussia hoax information...
You do realize I dismissed those just the same, right?
quote:
The MSM is not going to shine any light on their own corruption.
What corruption of "the MSM" did Trump give direct, credible evidence of in his speech?
He vaguely referenced some who allegedly god paid money by China, without any names or evidence. He also ignored what was in the documents about countries like Russia and Israel.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Epstein story was something that the nation cared about.
That's where you're wrong.
It was a story that the national media cared about (and the Dems when they thought they could wrap it around Trump's neck). A smaller number of actual Americans cared about that story than the MAGA and Q-tards you referenced.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 8:41 am
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:41 am to udtiger
Bingo
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:43 am to udtiger
quote:
That's where you're wrong.
It was a story that the national media cared about
Oh OK. This is where we ignore evidence based in reality and refer to the vague conspiracy.
Next you're going to do the emotional melt thing where you talk about how the country is doomed, I guess, as that's your schtick
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Literally nothing I said touched on the left
And I'm countering the promotion of Leftist economics in a thread this morning
I don't know why some people can't see it, but you're certainly a lawyer and living up to most expectations.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:51 am to udtiger
For those keeping score at home...
The point made in the OP has been conceded by the board contrarian, but the clear and unmistakable difference in the treatment of these two stories has been excused basically because "people cared about Epstein, but not about election fraud."
The point made in the OP has been conceded by the board contrarian, but the clear and unmistakable difference in the treatment of these two stories has been excused basically because "people cared about Epstein, but not about election fraud."
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:07 am to udtiger
quote:
The point made in the OP has been conceded by the board contrarian,
I made the point 1-2 days ago, as I said in this thread.
We saw this with the Epstein files being released bigly
quote:
Posted on 7/17/26 at 10:29 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
but the clear and unmistakable difference in the treatment of these two stories has been excused basically because "people cared about Epstein, but not about election fraud."
Did you just learn this morning news will cover stories of public interest/demand more?
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 9:10 am
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:24 am to Jbird
Spot on.
He is a small government proponent, just one with small conservative representation.
He is a small government proponent, just one with small conservative representation.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:24 am to udtiger
quote:
people cared about Epstein
The interesting about people on here is that they cared deeply about the Epstein stuff until Trump started telling them not to
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News