- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you want to discuss the 315k vote situation or something else? It seems like you want to discuss something else.
You're either happy with the results of a ridiculously compromised election system or its useful idiot.
There is zero logic behind the system, from registration to voting to counting, unless you're objective is to create a system that's easily defrauded.
We can argue machines and recounts and ballots until we're blue in the face, and get nowhere. That's by design.
I'll put it this way - I would bet my house that if you had to prove citizenship while registering, had to vote in person with legit ID (or mail in a notarized ballot with a deadline of election day), the federal government would look different than it does today.
2
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:31 pm to G2160
Muh clerical errorz!!!!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:31 pm to G2160
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. AJC - Fulton County reprimanded for double-scanned ballots in 2020 recount
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:48 pm to David_DJS
quote:
We can argue machines and recounts and ballots until we're blue in the face, and get nowhere. That's by design.
Exactly.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:53 pm to David_DJS
quote:
We can argue machines and recounts and ballots until we're blue in the face, and get nowhere. That's by design.
Well that's extremely important to this specific story
Otherwise, you permit people to use dishonesty and conflation to project "evidence" of "fraud" out of anything. CLEARLY that's what many on this message board want to do, which is why they react so much when their bubble is popped and the dishonesty/conflation is pointed out.
Just look at how so many want to leave the context of this story and get very upset when forced to remain within its framing.
quote:
I would bet my house that if you had to prove citizenship while registering, had to vote in person with legit ID (or mail in a notarized ballot with a deadline of election day), the federal government would look different than it does today.
Very possible. However even that doesn't prove fraud.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Very possible. However even that doesn't prove fraud.
It should be easy for you to wrap that huge brain of yours around something so simple.
It is nearly impossible to prove fraud that's staring you in the face. That's by design. Not unlike watching NBA basketball.
ETA -
quote:
Just look at how so many want to leave the context of this story and get very upset when forced to remain within its framing.
That's because your approach is like we're in a courtroom, with evidentiary rules, etc., rather than look at the big and obvious picture and agree, "yeah this whole thing is fricked up."
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:04 pm to David_DJS
quote:
That's because your approach is like we're in a courtroom, with evidentiary rules, etc.,
It's more I understand the patterns of the conspiratorial mind and the shitty rhetoric that's has developed since 2016. They have been given a few talking points they don't fully understand and can't adequately defend, so when they are backed into a corner they jump to other talking points there been told to use.
Keeping them on topic and using facts and logic
That's why if they can't pivot, the next move is to attack the facts as fraudulent.
It's the same thing over and over
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
"Since 2016"
Omg
Recently bias much lol
PS
Read a history book please
Omg
Recently bias much lol
PS
Read a history book please
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:08 pm to goatmilker
The demographics on here shifted HARD in 2016 along with the definition of "conservative". Then it ramped up even worse in. 2019 with Q
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you ever going to take a stab at why Fulton won’t release their ballot images as required by state law?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes it has.
But nothing new under the sun.
A populist President has brought populist supporters with him.
The Establishment has fought this tooth and nail.
Here we are.
But nothing new under the sun.
A populist President has brought populist supporters with him.
The Establishment has fought this tooth and nail.
Here we are.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's more I understand the patterns of the conspiratorial mind and the shitty rhetoric that's has developed since 2016. They have been given a few talking points they don't fully understand and can't adequately defend, so when they are backed into a corner they jump to other talking points there been told to use.
You can ask a few of the participants in this thread - I argued the silliness of the "tabulators in Maricopa county" argument for months on here, as well as the embarrassing "case" that Kari Lake's lawyers put on in her election fraud hearing. I know the difference between BS designed for social media (clicks and contributions) and the system we have that was quite literally put together to foster fraud.
And recognize that you're not different in arguments than "they" are. When challenged you often resort to "that's a different topic" rather than addressing the overriding point - our elections are compromised.
quote:
That's why if they can't pivot, the next move is to attack the facts as fraudulent.
It's the same thing over and over
Yep. And you do it, too.
Answer this simple question - do you think there is meaningful registration/voter fraud in the US at the federal elections level?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:16 pm to David_DJS
quote:
do you think there is meaningful registration/voter fraud in the US at the federal elections level?
What threshold is meaningful ?
And are we including legal things like legal MIV and ballot harvesting as fraud?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
Democrats could battle this by producing the paper ballots.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And are we including legal things like legal MIV and ballot harvesting as fraud?
Fraudulent MIV and fraudulent ballot harvesting is still fraudulent.
For example in Arizona MIV, an immediate family member can drop off ballots and there may be a cap on the number, let's say there is and it's five. So there is legal MIV. But if you've got someone not an immediate family member dropping off a few hundred ballots, that's fraud. Same story about harvesting.
Do you believe there is meaningful registration/voter fraud in the US at the federal election level?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:27 pm to antibarner
quote:
Fox guarding the henhouse counselor. Who did the recounts? The same people that screwed the thing up to start with? If so we can't trust that.
They confessed counselor. They did not follow election law, Not election suggestion. LAW. You're allegedly an officer of the court you should be outraged. This
This is where you’ll lose SFP. He’s a liberal, so it’s not the letter of the law that counts, it’s how he FEELS about it that’s important.
This way, he’s never wrong. He can change how he feels about a situation, argue whatever position he’s feeling at that moment, and will never be wrong.
It doesn’t matter that they actually broke election law, he feels that they upheld the “spirit” of the law.
I bet SFP would argue with a stop sign.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you ever going to take a stab at why Fulton won’t release their ballot images as required by state law?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:32 pm to loogaroo
Maybe this has been answered already but what is the purpose of requiring a signature on the tabulator tapes?
Is it a chain of custody thing? is it so there is a record of who actually ran the tabulator?
Is it a chain of custody thing? is it so there is a record of who actually ran the tabulator?
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News