- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Whether or not he could or would indict a sitting President, the report cleared Trump of collusion. You agree, right? The report also left it to the AG to decide on Obstruciton. The AG and Rosenstein said no obstruction. You agree right?
Cleared of collusion.
You are mistaken about obstruction. Try retorting to the quoted bit from the op.
It's referred to Congress.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:20 pm to CelticDog
Just to point this out again, you believed that your duly elected president was a Russian plant, spy, and traitor, Otto.
That is so absolutely batshit insane that your opinions are generally moot now.
And to make matters worse, you were SADDENED by the fact that that wasn’t true.
That is a whole different level of insanity.
Oh, and that ban bet I posted earlier is still in play, big boy.
That is so absolutely batshit insane that your opinions are generally moot now.
And to make matters worse, you were SADDENED by the fact that that wasn’t true.
That is a whole different level of insanity.
Oh, and that ban bet I posted earlier is still in play, big boy.
This post was edited on 4/26/19 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:22 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Just to point this out again, you believed that your duly elected president was a Russian plant, spy, and traitor, Otto.
And
When nothing comes of the latest silliness, he'll disappear for like 2 months again like a pussy
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:23 pm to CelticDog
quote:
You are mistaken about obstruction. Try retorting to the quoted bit from the op.
Who has the say on CRIMINAL obstruction? (Hint: the AG)
What did the AG do? (Hint: exonerate)
If you want to focus on the political recourse...then yes, Congress has the power to impeach. They can do this without having to meet the burden of proving a thing. Congrats.
I just want you to be clear there was not and will never be criminal obstruction.
Glad we can agree.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:23 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Cleared of collusion.
What were your predictions on collusion? Dead wrong? I thought so.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:25 pm to BBONDS25
What's your take on state of new York vs Trump in re tax fraud?
Anything going to come of it?
Anything going to come of it?
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:26 pm to CelticDog
quote:
What's your take on state of new York vs Trump in re tax fraud?
Anything going to come of it?
No
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:26 pm to CelticDog
quote:
What's your take on state of new York vs Trump in re tax fraud?
Is it tax fraud? What state tax are they alleging he fraudulently avoided? I thought it was bank fraud. That has no legs.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:27 pm to CelticDog
quote:No.
What's your take on state of new York vs Trump in re tax fraud?
Anything going to come of it?
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:29 pm to Scruffy
I was asking Barry but ok, noted.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:47 pm to CelticDog
quote:The fact that you can't deduce the answer all by yourself is honestly, an indictment of your lack of analytical skills
I was asking Barry but ok, noted.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 2:57 pm to CelticDog
quote:
was asking Barry but ok, noted.
I responded. Do you not have the details? Are you just hoping? That didn’t work out well for you with Muh Russia.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 3:33 pm to CelticDog
quote:
was and will be policy not to indict sitting presidents.
Got a non-attorney talking about attorney things here. Sad.
I'm correct.
Im not hating, Im not insulting, Im just telling you that there is no policy. If you know of something in a DOJ Policy Manual please share, but Id suggest not wasting your time.
Mueller cited "guidance" provided in a October of 2000 Bill Clinton DOJ "opinion memorandum" that itself relied upon a 1973 DOJ opinion memorandum penned by the Nixon DOJ. Those years and Presidents are more than relevant in the consideration of the "opinions" at those times, for obvious reasons.
Mueller was bound by no official policy or law. As stated above and by himself, he was "guided" by that "opinion".
Ask yourself this: If Trump sawed a person's head off while literally in the WH and he doesnt even try to deny it...you really believe they'd go with "clean up the mess, but dont bother POTUS about it, nothing can be done"?
Posted on 4/26/19 at 3:42 pm to davyjones
Fine. Guidance. It amounts to policy.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 3:46 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Fine. Guidance. It amounts to policy
What abt the head sawing aka murder part, say in POTUS' 1st year? What do they do with that?
Posted on 4/26/19 at 5:56 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Fine. Guidance. It amounts to policy.
Did you ever say firing Comey was obstruction? If you did, you are being hypocritical.
This post was edited on 4/26/19 at 5:57 pm
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News