Started By
Message

re: Four socialist-backed candidates win Pennsylvania legislative primaries

Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:25 am to
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20884 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:25 am to
START THE ROTORS
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20884 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

I normally don’t read your drivel, but it is nice to see the good guys advancing.


What are your thoughts on the lumpenproletariat?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55506 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:32 am to
Untermenschen, obviously.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Socialism and capitalism are meant to coexist.




Not according to Karl Marx, or Lenin, or Mao, or any other figure head of Socialist ideology.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:36 am to
quote:

There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them


Maybe to people who have never studied politics and make up definitions as they go.



Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:38 am to
quote:

In a country like Denmark




Denmark is more economically free than the U.S.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30917 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Four socialist-backed candidates win Pennsylvania legislative primaries


"Backed" can mean a lot of things.

Trump was "backed" by the KKK. It doesn't mean one shite about what the man is about though.

I would need more info than just saying they're "backed" by them to get into any kind of moral outrage.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17028 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Then it ceases to have meaning. A word or idea that has many definitions is no effective word at all.


Does the word frick cease to have meaning?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53485 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:50 am to
quote:

I would need more info than just saying they're "backed" by them to get into any kind of moral outrage.



Then read.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Does the word frick cease to have meaning?


"frick" is slang and used in situations where its intended meaning is easily decipherable by the context of the statement.

For instance:

Socialism royally fricks up an economy.

Anyone who believes that the a central command economy is preferable to a market economy is fricking retarded.

These stupid fricks don't know an ounce of history if they advocate socialism.


I could go on.


This post was edited on 5/16/18 at 11:57 am
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17028 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Except that they all fricking suck and normally end with millions dead and starving.




We have numerous socialist programs in this country. Do they all suck?
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:54 am to
quote:

We have numerous socialist programs in this country.


No, we don't. The only arguable one is the military but even then our citizens are not prevented from forming a paramilitary group from private capital.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55506 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:56 am to
quote:

We have numerous socialist programs in this country. Do they all suck?



Really, what are these socialist programs?

Calling redistributive programs socialist only serves to make actual socialism palatable.

These programs are wealth redistribution, not socialism. The ideas might have some intersecting preferences, but they are NOT the same in policy.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17028 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 11:58 am to
quote:

"frick" is slang and used in situations where its intended meaning is easily decipherable by the context of the statement.

For instance:

Socialism royally fricks up an economy.

Anyone who believes that the a central command economy is preferable to a market economy is fricking retarded.

These stupid fricks don't know an ounce of history when the advocate socialism.


I could go on.


So frick is used as a spin-off from it's intended meaning? The same way socialist programs can be a spin-off from it's defined meaning?

I'm not advocating for full socialism. However, some socialist programs are good for our country. Just like full blown capitalism is not good.

Everything in moderation.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

The same way socialist programs can be a spin-off from it's defined meaning?



Nope. Clearly you missed the entire point. Socialism, or any political/economic ideology is not slang.


quote:

I'm not advocating for full socialism. However, some socialist programs are good for our country. Just like full blown capitalism is not good.


"Socialist programs" would be industries completely owned by the U.S. government who production, distribution, and consumption schemes were controlled by Washington.

We don't have those.

Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55506 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

So frick is used as a spin-off from it's intended meaning?


frick is colloquial. Its uses are varied due to the evolution of language. The definition and usage of a word like socialism - or capitalism, or Georgism, fascism, whatever - has ideological and practical implications. So their functions, as words, are utterly different.

Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17028 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

"Socialist programs" would be industries completely owned by the U.S. government who production, distribution, and consumption schemes were controlled by Washington.


Once again, I'm not saying "full blown" socialism. I'm saying programs that have socialist concepts such as the military.
They work and have been working for a long time.
The same can be said for capitalism. There isn't a "free market" in this country and never will be.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17028 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Its uses are varied due to the evolution of language.


The same can be said about the evolution of socialism.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I'm saying programs that have socialist concepts such as the military.
They work and have been working for a long time.
The same can be said for capitalism. There isn't a "free market" in this country and never will be.


Redistribution programs and government funded agencies is not "socialism" - full blown, half blown or otherwise.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55506 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

The same can be said about the evolution of socialism.



Not as I understand it. I'm willing to be proven wrong. As I see it, though, socialism still means collective control of the means of production. Has the intent moved beyond that?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram