Started By
Message

re: Former CIA Director John Brennan has been subpoenaed to testify before grand jury

Posted on 10/13/26 at 7:57 am to
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33339 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Since when does someone under investigation get to testify before a grand jury that should hear evidence presented by the prosecution? Is Florida different or is he flipping with evidence about others?


He is a subject, not a target of that investigation, per DOJ official.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486586 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Brennan is a POS, even you can admit, no?

Sure

What does that have to do with anything?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173292 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:00 am to
I cant find what you reference. This is odd...

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
20532 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:09 am to
Well, Decaturd has been a known purveyor of untruths.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33339 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I cant find what you reference. This is odd...


Do you have trouble reading English?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173292 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:28 am to
I missed it on the last page. This sounds like Brennan and Nicole Wallace. Brennan wont call him president, neither does NYT lackeys.
quote:

New York Times examination of the inquiry, based on more than 20 interviews with current and former officials, found that it was star-crossed from the outset.

The theory of the grand conspiracy case is a bedrock of Trumpist politics: that the various investigations into Mr. Trump, spanning nearly a decade, were all part of a nefarious scheme to take him down. That is, there was an ongoing plot stretching from the investigation into ties between Russia and his 2016 campaign to the two prosecutions overseen by the special counsel Jack Smith into his mishandling of classified documents and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

To date, Mr. diGenova and others involved in the case have found it difficult, and time-consuming, to meet the standards of evidence and jurisdiction needed to prove anything close to a conspiracy in a court of law.

Still, the pressure has not relented. The dozen prosecutors still pursuing the inquiry are fast-tracking narrower cases against some chief targets that could be brought quickly, according to people briefed on their work. Leadership of the effort has defaulted back to Washington, and is now being directly overseen by one of Mr. Blanche’s top deputies, Aakash Singh, those people said.

A Justice Department official said leaders in Washington had “full confidence” in the prosecutors now working on the case and would act to uphold the law should “evidence of misconduct present itself.”


quote:
By early 2026, the case had landed on the desk of Maria Medetis Long, a respected national security prosecutor in Miami, who approached the inquiry with an open mind. She eventually determined that the evidence did not support indicting Mr. Brennan, according to people familiar with her account. In April, she put her findings in writing. She was suddenly removed from the case.


quote:
The prosecutors also want testimony from Mr. Brennan. But amid the recent turmoil, they pushed back his appearance from its initial date on Oct. 15 to at least early December.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram