- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For decades doctors said formula was better than breastmilk
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:16 am to Gaggle
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:16 am to Gaggle
Nestle's produced a LOT of powdered formula for transport to Africa. It was purchased by lots of foreign aid agencies trying to help with poverty.
The African women were capable of breastfeeding but when they saw the pictures of healthy babies on the front of the package they opted for formula.
One problem. The formula had to be mixed with water. Their water was full of bacteria that adults could handle. But the babies died.
The African women were capable of breastfeeding but when they saw the pictures of healthy babies on the front of the package they opted for formula.
One problem. The formula had to be mixed with water. Their water was full of bacteria that adults could handle. But the babies died.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:19 am to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
The fact that people bought into this ridiculous theory is astounding.
Not really, in that era doctors were viewed as one level below God, their dictates were not to be questioned.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:24 am to EA6B
quote:
in that era doctors were viewed as one level below God
Dr. Fauci doesn't like your use of the word 'were.'
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:15 am to Gaggle
quote:
For decades doctors said formula was better than breastmilk
I’m going to need a source on this. Not like from one or two doctors, but a consensus statement from a pediatric/medical governing body.
Saying it’s “medically approved” and a reasonable alternative to breast milk isn’t sayings it’s “better.”
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:16 am to Category5
quote:
Many babies will lightly latch on and use the breast as a pacifier. Those babies could easily become malnourished in a very short time. Formula allows the mother to know how many ounces the child is getting.
Sure, a lot of babies do that. But an otherwise healthy baby would never “become malnourished” from this unless its mom has a serious problem with milk production. No type of pacifier will keep babies from getting hungry, and the hungrier they get the louder they cry. You can’t really fail to notice that. You definitely wouldn’t let it go on to the point of malnourishment if you’re a remotely competent parent. Besides, a baby that’s constantly suckling is also constantly stimulating increased milk production as part of a hormonal feedback loop that serves its function in the vast majority of adult women. (The practicality of it is a lot more open to debate.)
Also, I don’t know if you have any firsthand experience with this — but even a baby who’s latched on 24/7 just for comfort will get milk for sustenance at certain intervals. Once there’s a certain quantity of milk built up, the breasts release it reflexively, and the baby will swallow just as reflexively whether awake or asleep. And, reflex or not, as a mother you are definitely aware that it’s happening.
I’ll give you that measuring isn’t as easy. It can still be done if there’s genuine reason for concern, though. One of my kids had some issues right after birth and the hospital lent me an extra-sensitive scale so I could weigh him immediately before and after a feeding, and then calculate the difference to determine his milk intake. Cumbersome but very effective. For the typical mom and baby, though, there’s no actual need to get liquid measurements in the first place. If babies are growing, behaving, and developing appropriately, then they’re getting everything they need from whatever amount of breastmilk they ingest. Most of the time, measuring provides zero benefit for the baby; it just makes the parents feel better.
Bottom line, yes, many doctors claimed formula was superior for reasons beyond the ones listed above, and their reasons were largely rooted in ignorance. Others, such as your point about not being able to measure breastmilk easily, are issues of convenience and simplicity rather than actual superiority. These days, there’s just no real support for the argument that formula is “better” than breastmilk. It’s an acceptable alternative that may be the best choice for some people or in some circumstances, not a superior product in general. Nothing wrong about that … or with that.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:31 am to Gaggle
quote:
Of course the numerous studies published in the years after indisputably prove breastfeeding is superior, breastfed children are overall healthier, fewer hospital visits, longer lifespan, lower risk of seemingly every disease.
My wife (no pics) breastfed both of our children. Until they were almost a year old. Neither have any allergies, rarely get sick and are very athletic.
My brother and his wife did formula exclusively. Their kids are allergic to shellfish, tree nuts, and animal dander (dogs and cats). They are sick several times a year and always have some ailment.
I know it’s not a real “study” but it is enough for me to recommend everyone breast feed. Yea it is a pain for the wife to have to schedule time or pump but the health benefits are well worth it.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:40 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I wish you good luck in your research. I know that it's borne of an earnest desire to learn more
I’m going to need a source on this. Not like from one or two doctors, but a consensus statement from a pediatric/medical governing body.
Saying it’s “medically approved” and a reasonable alternative to breast milk isn’t sayings it’s “better.”
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:47 am to zatetic
DDT was a savior for the south. It absolutely eliminated malaria in the U.S.
Although it's thought to have a link to breast cancer it was pulled from the market due to making birds egg shells thin.
Other than that it's probably one of the best pesticides ever invented.
Although it's thought to have a link to breast cancer it was pulled from the market due to making birds egg shells thin.
Other than that it's probably one of the best pesticides ever invented.
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 11:48 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:50 am to Gaggle
This falls in the No shite Sherlock category. Any fool can guess that natural breastfeeding is better - that is, assuming your mom isn’t a crackhead.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:55 am to Eli Goldfinger
It’s pretty common knowledge now that breastfeeding is more healthy. Some baby’s don’t latch on though and women are forced to pump or use formula. My wife has weird nipples and my son couldn’t use them. It is what it is. So she pumped.
Most formulas say something to the effect of “Has ingredients similar to breast milk”. I don’t know how long they have been like that cause we only had a child 2 years ago.
Most formulas say something to the effect of “Has ingredients similar to breast milk”. I don’t know how long they have been like that cause we only had a child 2 years ago.
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 11:57 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:11 pm to Crimsonite94
My wife eats a very healthy protein packed diet. She's in phenomenal shape and never gets sick. She's due in a few months and will breast feed relentlessly because there's no doctor on the planet that could convince us her naturally produced milk isn't the absolute best thing for our baby.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:23 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I’m going to need a source on this. Not like from one or two doctors, but a consensus statement from a pediatric/medical governing body.
In the eras I am familiar with the late 50s and the 60s almost no woman breast feed, the few that did were looked upon as some kind of freak. All these mothers got the idea that using formula was a good idea from some where. Drs were placed on a pedestal then, if they had said breast feeding was better that’s what would have happened. My moms Doctor absolutely told her formula was a better source of nutrition, of course he said that while lighting up a Camel.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:29 pm to Gaggle
Doctors have never said formula over natural breast fed milk. This is complete bullshite. So are we now gonna second guess every fricking doctor because the vaccine doesn't work like you thought it did? I'm not for mandating the vaccine, but there are plenty of vaccines out there that actually do work. Let's not discredit all of them.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 12:36 pm to AirbusDawg
quote:Yes they did.
Doctors have never said formula over natural breast fed milk
quote:No it's not.
This is complete bullshite
quote:No, we should have already.
So are we now gonna second guess every fricking doctor because the vaccine doesn't work like you thought it did?
quote:Breastfeeders were considered like antivaxxers. Pre-covid antivaxxers, the autism kind. That's what correct and polite majority society thought of breastfeeders. Into the 80s and even 90s in parts of the country, breastfeeding was considered by the majority to be like some kind of hippie dippie alternative medicine anti science crap. Formula has all the nutrition. This is what most everyone thought, and breastfeeding was stigmatized for this reason. Doctors had began being directly advertised formula by the manufacturers in the 1940s-50s. For decades from this time doctors everywhere directly, implicitly, and tacitly promoted the use of formula over breastmilk.
I'm not for mandating the vaccine, but there are plenty of vaccines out there that actually do work. Let's not discredit all of them.
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 11/25/21 at 1:03 pm to Gaggle
The wife breast fed both of our kids until they were 15 months old.
No health issues for them, and she lost pregnancy weight fast.
No health issues for them, and she lost pregnancy weight fast.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 1:24 pm to EA6B
quote:
In the eras I am familiar with the late 50s and the 60s almost no woman breast feed, the few that did were looked upon as some kind of freak. All these mothers got the idea that using formula was a good idea from some where. Drs were placed on a pedestal then,
Ok if that’s the case why are y’all struggling to provide evidence that most doctors were arguing formula was better than breast milk? I wasn’t alive then and the anecdotal evidence of random PB posters is about as unreliable of a source as it gets.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 1:27 pm to Gaggle
quote:
Breastfeeders were considered like antivaxxers. Pre-covid antivaxxers, the autism kind. That's what correct and polite majority society thought of breastfeeders. Into the 80s and even 90s in parts of the country, breastfeeding was considered by the majority to be like some kind of hippie dippie alternative medicine anti science crap. Formula has all the nutrition. This is what most everyone thought, and breastfeeding was stigmatized for this reason. Doctors had began being directly advertised formula by the manufacturers in the 1940s-50s. For decades from this time doctors everywhere directly, implicitly, and tacitly promoted the use of formula over breastmilk.
You can keep repeating this over and over, doesn’t make it true my guy.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 1:36 pm to onmymedicalgrind
You're very ignorant. There are things you don't know about the world and the way things were. You're not willing to find out, obviously. My epistemology is not yours. You said you need more sources. YOU need them. So go get them. I don't have one thing I read that convinced me. I'm not afraid of what you'll find because I know how things were and I know you're ignorant. You're dismissive and protectionist. If you're a doctor, I trust doctors less now because of your posts.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 1:48 pm to Gaggle
This is an excellent post. I know you have the vaccine in mind and all the certainty surrounding it, but my mind went to SSRIs and SNRIs. These antidepressants are being handed out like candy by every Dr Tom, Dick, and Harry despite very dubious evidence that they help most people. They also cause severe dependency problems, and many will never be able to come off of them. Of course, the money flows, and we all know that’s what really matters. It’s not a flaw of science or medicine. It’s just that capital will always try to grow and create new markets, and your body and mind are fertile territory.
Popular
Back to top



0






