re: Fmr. CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield: Jab Should Not Have Been Called a vaccine

quote:

---

But you were very pro-vaccine, were you not?

---

In a general sense, yes, but again, I was not in support of the strategy that was employed for numerous reasons. Although the powers that made the decisions invoked other disease control strategies by referencing smallpox, the major difference in the approach was that the pharmaceutical companies involved made an extremely cost-effective, dry powder vaccine which did not require refrigeration and they did not attempt to enforce patents. When it was announced that the companies involved now would instead protect their patents in late 2020 or early 2021, I knew that it was a lost cause.

The end result was a very narrow vaccine which wasn't used as it was promised, with frequent updates to match the mutation rate of the virus, nor was it used thoughtfully. I suggested that, if that was the strategy chosen, the only viable way to use it would be a global rollout within an incredibly short time period, with epidemiological measures such as lockdowns used as a last-line measure to limit the genomic diversity of the virus in the hopes that it would reach its 'error mutation rate' and eventually fizzle out. That was never going to happen, but the limitations of the vaccine did not prevent me from suggesting that the design of it was clever, using the most antigenic and vital portion of the virus morphology against it, while also focusing on an epitope-biased response.

quote:

---

First do no harm. It should have never been mandated and never recommended for anyone but the highest risk patients, if at all.

---

Mandates have to be used within an overall strategy. Here is a post I made from 2021 where I echo some of these notions as well as provide more nuance. LINK

quote:

---

Not shitting on you, just curious as to why you still were such a proponent for it, especially in younger, healthier subjects.

---

If you look at that link, I provide a justification, but in short, the thought process at the time was that decreasing disease severity and course will decrease viral load and potentially the overall infectivity. But as I point out in that next paragraph, if you want to control disease, you need a cogent strategy, not a piecemeal one. If the powers that be decide we have to use the mRNA vaccine, that requires a set of other measures in order to maximize the effectiveness of the vaccine. We were never going to do that, and thus prolonged the pandemic for no real reason other than money. And I don't see that industrial complex being broken any time soon, which does not portend good things for even epidemic level events in the future.

quote:

---

It 100% looks like it was just an sociological experiment in compliance and obedience.

---

I agree with everything you said, except for this. I truly believe that this pandemic was unleashed on the world to get Donald Trump out of office. It was the only way the global elites were ever going to be able to get millions of totally unaccountable and fraudulent mail-in ballots that would be needed to beat Donald Trump in 2020. They literally put up a completely controllable fricking dementia-riddle vegetable because they knew there would be enough fraudulent ballots cast that they could put anyone in office.

quote:

---

Smart people knew it was not a vaccine.

---

Smart people should know better than to make that statement. Of course it is a vaccine. It is simply increasingly ineffective, and unnecessary outside of very specific circumstances.