- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida Surgeon General Seeks to End ALL Vaccine Mandates
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:39 pm to Flats
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:39 pm to Flats
quote:
But I don't buy the "this will save health care money so it's ok to mandate" argument he was making.
It is by far the cheapest intervention we have for several infectious disease, as the cost of the sequelae of infections can be lifelong.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:41 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
It is by far the cheapest intervention we have
The cost of the shot has nothing to do with my point. My point is that just because something saves us money, that's not automatically a good reason to mandate personal behavior. That has a cost all its own.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:49 pm to Flats
quote:
The cost of the shot has nothing to do with my point. My point is that just because something saves us money, that's not automatically a good reason to mandate personal behavior. That has a cost all its own
Yes, there are some things you can mandate and some things you can’t. And principally, infectious disease is something you can mandate because of the fact that infectious disease is infectious. You can’t mandate good behavior, even if that behavior might lead to worse outcomes (such as the HIV epidemic in the US).
And what is the cost of a mandate? Be specific here.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:51 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
And what is the cost of a mandate? Be specific here.
The loss of freedom and the willingness of politicians to erode them further when they see it can be done.
Have you honestly forgotten some of the "elite's" behavior during all that craziness? Rule for thee, not for me.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:54 pm to Flats
quote:
The loss of freedom and the willingness of politicians to erode them further when they see it can be done.
With vaccine mandates? What?
quote:
Have you honestly forgotten some of the "elite's" behavior during all that craziness? Rule for thee, not for me.
That is the entire orientation of our political economy. Getting upset about vaccine mandates is definitely easy fodder for doing nothing about pharmaceutical capture of regulatory and academic institutions, and other things that are more important and we could possibly do something about.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:56 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
And what is the cost of a mandate? Be specific here.
Infringing on rights.
Accepting that some will have bad reactions, but that's the price to pay and it's worth it.
Coercing people to a personal risk for someone else's personal benefit (since some can't be vaccinated or are immunocompromised).
To name a few.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:56 pm to TigerDoc
quote:hopefully insurance companies wont cover these kinds of illnesses that could have easily been prevented by vaccines. If your parents are too stupid to vaccinate you then you are too stupid to save.
Not just measles. Buy your healthcare sector stocks everybody - insurance premiums, clinical and public health costs gonna go to the moon if this goes down.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 6:56 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Getting upset about vaccine mandates
I'm not upset about anything, I'm discussing my opinion that "it saves money" is not necessarily a sufficient reason to mandate personal behavior.
Influenza is an infectious disease that burdens our health care system; should we mandate that vaccine as well? Why or why not? Be specific.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:01 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
hopefully insurance companies wont cover these kinds of illnesses that could have easily been prevented by vaccines. If your parents are too stupid to vaccinate you then you are too stupid to save.
You can easily apply this to obesity and obesity related disease.
Also to Substance Use Disorder (drug addicts).
Also to Persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD).
Also to people with a history of inhaling combustable tobacco or marijuana.
Also to thrill seekers and their related, avoidable injuries.
If we nullified insurance coverage for poor life choices, it would certainly save money!
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:02 pm to Flats
quote:
Influenza is an infectious disease that burdens our health care system; should we mandate that vaccine as well? Why or why not? Be specific
We can’t at the moment, because of the morphology of influenza itself. There are several other pathogens for which developing a vaccine would be difficult by virtue of specific characteristics of the pathogen. For pathogens which we have stable vaccines as well as relative control of transmission vectors, we should aim to eradicate those diseases. The savings from the smallpox campaign was worth several orders of what we spent organizing it.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:03 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
We can’t at the moment, because of the morphology of influenza itself.
People get flu vaccines every year. A lot of people choose not to, and that will cost health care money. Why shouldn't it be mandatory?
ETA And why stop there? A lot of people don't even get annual bloodwork or checkups. Mandate that stuff so we can save money.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:07 pm to Flats
quote:
People get flu vaccines every year. A lot of people choose not to, and that will cost health care money. Why shouldn't it be mandatory?
I already told you why it wouldn’t be effective. We don’t have control of the transmission vectors either.
quote:
ETA And why stop there? A lot of people don't even get annual bloodwork or checkups. Mandate that stuff so we can save money.
I mean, you are supposed to.
With this nonsense fatalism, what should we attempt to control in terms of infectious disease?
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:25 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I already told you why it wouldn’t be effective.
Why is the medical community giving millions of people a flu vaccine every year if it’s not effective?
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:33 pm to Flats
quote:
Why is the medical community giving millions of people a flu vaccine every year if it’s not effective?
For me, it provides protection but its efficacy is too variable from season to season, again, for the reasons I’ve already stated. The same is true of COVID vaccines. It is generally a good idea to get vaccinated for specific patient groups though.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:45 pm to Flats
quote:
That's a poor attempt at a deflection. Nobody taking SNAP is forced to accept it.
"Mandatory" vaccination is something of a misnomer. People are likewise not forced to accept it. Most “vaccine mandates” are really eligibility requirements for participation in communal settings. E.g. you can refuse vaccination and be barred from enrolling in school and people can and do home school kids over such refusals.
We used to have compulsory vaccination in the country when smallpox running wild because you were even more dangerous to others with a disease that had a10-30% chance of killing you. The penalty was a fine, and technically they could jail you, but realistically this only happened if you were poor.
If there was a health condition that was contagious and had comparably bad outcomes to smallpox that compulsory diets or exercise could prevent, I would at least mandate it and definitely consider making it compulsory.
But I'm not opposed to some better solution with incentives than mandatory vaccination schemes to keep community immunity up at high enough levels for herd immunity. Any ideas for this?
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:46 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
It is generally a good idea to get vaccinated for specific patient groups though.
I’m not talking about whether or not it’s a good idea, I’m asking why it shouldn’t be mandatory if saving money is the metric.
Or maybe you agree with me that saving money isn’t a sufficient reason to mandate behavior.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:51 pm to Flats
quote:
I’m not talking about whether or not it’s a good idea, I’m asking why it shouldn’t be mandatory if saving money is the metric.
And I am talking about what specific pathogens we can reasonably mandate. I literally described the scenario a few posts up. I’ve already answered which pathogens fall into the category where mandated vaccinations would save money in the long-run.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:51 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
"Mandatory" vaccination is something of a misnomer. People are likewise not forced to accept it
Do this or face negative consequences isn’t a mandate? What would you consider a mandate? Certainly not laws or medical regulations.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:56 pm to Flats
No, I'm saying a vaccine mandate for school eligibility is analogous to dietary coverage of SNAP. You don't have to participate in either, but have to abide by the requirements if you do.
Popular
Back to top


1





