- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/18/23 at 6:35 am to hogcard1964
quote:
There's a few of those here. Strange hill to die on.
I get there may be a legal challenge. I also get people are opposed to the death penalty.
It’s the socially awkward enthusiasm that some possess to rush in and defend pedophiles.
He will next say, “I didn’t defend anyone. I just pointed out a precedent”.
Maybe he doesn’t understand the partiality he presents when discussing pedophilia.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 6:39 am to Powerman
quote:
Can't imagine life is very pleasant for a child rapist in prison. I think the death penalty might be the easier way out for them.
In most prison systems, death (ultimately) after a long wait isn’t the punishment. The punishment is having spent that waiting period on Death Row, which is a very different living condition than gen pop.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:How many of the down votes do you think are because of your post?
As of this response, 7 downvotes simply for stating reality
How many do you think are because of you?
For the record, the current tally at the time of this post is 57 down votes vs the one up vote you gave yourself.
Impressive
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:25 am to Rebel
quote:Most pedos appear to be proud people....
You sure do seem to take pride in being pro pedo.
Sick
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:37 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
William Gladson said a grand jury had indicted Joseph Andrew Giampa on six counts of Sexual Battery Upon a Person Under Twelve Years of Age and three counts of Promoting a Sexual Performance by a Child,
Hopefully we start setting some precedence here and turn his lights out..
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:40 am to Penrod
quote:
It was ruled that way by a past SCOTUS. That does not mean a future SCOTUS sees it that way. T
No fricking shite? REALLY? Go re-read my comments.
quote:
This is, after all, a matter of opinion, not a clear constitutional violation. See Roe v Wade for an example.
This is based in the words of the Bill of Rights. It's not made up like Roe. Completely different thing.
quote:
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
This is a legitimate Constitutional question, unlike the abortion issue.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not constitutional.
Oh that matters again? Or just to protect pedos?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:41 am to Rebel
quote:
It’s the socially awkward enthusiasm that some possess to rush in and defend pedophiles.
Who is defending pedophiles ITT?
Correcting OP with the reality of the current state of the law has no overlap with the underlying facts/ accusations.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:42 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Oh that matters again?
It's always mattered
quote:
Or just to protect pedos?
The precedent applies to a lot more than just pedos.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:42 am to GusAU
quote:
Most pedos appear to be proud people....
Hank wants them in minimum security so they dont get hurt.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:43 am to LATIGERFAN
quote:
Will be overturned by judges that observe the rule of law.
Very true. But I appreciate the effort on the part of the State of Florida.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's always mattered
Then why do we federally fund and protect illegal immigration in states that oppose it?
This post was edited on 12/18/23 at 7:45 am
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:46 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Then when do we federally fund and protect illegal immigration in states that oppose it?
That's a loaded question. To discuss this properly you're going to have to break that down into separate questions each with their own constitutional issue.
Like, for example, "protect illegal immigration". You have to define that specifically and give examples. Most of the issues at the border involve the Geneva Convention, which was a set of treaties legally agreed upon by Constitutional process. What is your Constitutional issue, exactly? Are you claiming that we didn't properly sign/ratify these treaties?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 7:47 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Not constitutional.
Oh that matters again? Or just to protect pedos?
Rape used to be eligible for the death penalty, think it was ruled unconstitutional in the 70s.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who is defending pedophiles ITT?
I already said you would proclaim this.
quote:
He will next say, “I didn’t defend anyone. I just pointed out a precedent”.
In your eagerness to be a provocateur, you always align with pedos.
I don’t believe you are an actual pedo (like Hank). But you certainly have a blind spot to how you present to other people.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:11 am to Rebel
quote:
In your eagerness to be a provocateur, you always align with pedos.
There is no alignment with pedos.
I'm speaking of the prosecutor wasting his county's time and resources. I didn't discuss the underlying incident/charge.
quote:
But you certainly have a blind spot to how you present to other people.
Only within the unnatural state of this board, but most of that is projection. Again, see this thread (and your posts). Remove the emotional thinking and understand what is specifically being discussed.
I didn't discuss the Florida pedo. The only reference to anything pedo ITT from me is my reference to the USSC case.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Pedo defender SFP to the rescue
Posted on 12/18/23 at 9:33 am to Kjnstkmn
No one was murdered but it's a lead-pipe cinch that those little ones lost something that will never be regained or repaired.
In that spirit, perhaps not the death penalty but some form of castration or FGM would be apropos...
In that spirit, perhaps not the death penalty but some form of castration or FGM would be apropos...
Posted on 12/18/23 at 9:35 am to Kjnstkmn
MAGA & Chief Spokeswoman Loomer will hate it.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News