- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Feud between The Daily Wire and Steven Crowder goes public...
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:35 am to LSUnation78
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:35 am to LSUnation78
quote:
Your big brain sure showed me.
His sub base is $5-6M/month in recurring revenue but continue to flame away instead bringing any value to this thread
1
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:36 am to jnethe1
quote:
I said anyone, so that would remove the idea that he would be special.
You said "everyone who doesn’t present the narrative that big tech wants" which you apparently believe includes Crowder.
So...back to you.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:36 am to 3nOut
quote:
if they’re going to let him get away with what he said, Crowder shouldn’t be worried.
Yeah Matt Walsh, Jordan Peterson, and Michael Knowles take on some hotwire social issues and have not been yanked from youtube. Twitter has been the fascists in most of the cancelations
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:36 am to GumboPot
quote:
Are DW content providers allowed to discuss the 2020 election fraud? IDK because I'm not a DW customer.
Ben is a bigass grifter. He toes the line when told.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
What is the alternative? I suppose that Crowder could always work for free
So essentially demonetization because he doesn’t present the narrative that is deemed allowable.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:37 am to jnethe1
quote:
it’s about the ability for him to lose revenue based on something he can’t control.
He can control it. He just doesn't think he should have to.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:37 am to jnethe1
So instead of allowing businesses to protect themselves from loss of revenue, you think they should just give crowder a blank check to do whatever he wants, revenue streams be damned?
Bottom line(wether anyone likes it or not) these people depend on revenue and exposure from big tech.
Thats not DW’s fault. They’re fighting it as much as anyone else. But reality is reality. You dont stay in business by burning benjamins
Bottom line(wether anyone likes it or not) these people depend on revenue and exposure from big tech.
Thats not DW’s fault. They’re fighting it as much as anyone else. But reality is reality. You dont stay in business by burning benjamins
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:38 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do you think YouTube should be forced to pay Crowder, regardless of what he says on their platform?
Should a kid who demonstrates toys with his parents on YouTube get paid?
This post was edited on 1/19/23 at 8:39 am
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:39 am to RollTide1987
quote:how is he worth even a quarter of that?
- The Daily Wire would pay Crowder $50 million over four years, with the option of paying him $25 million for a two-year renewal
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:39 am to LSUnation78
quote:
They’re fighting it as much as anyone else
DW is part of the problem.
Say something about Israel.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:40 am to jnethe1
quote:
Should a kid who demonstrates toys with his parents on YouTube get paid?
If YouTube decides to pay him, sure.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:41 am to LSUnation78
quote:
So instead of allowing businesses to protect themselves from loss of revenue, you think they should just give crowder a blank check to do whatever he wants, revenue streams be damned?
If he’s bringing views/clicks, then what is the issue?
And how can there be a loss of revenue?
quote:
Bottom line(wether anyone likes it or not) these people depend on revenue and exposure from big tech.
That’s the same as saying a fisherman depend upon the seas for fish. There’s no changing that medium.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:41 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
I realize Tucker is making bank at Fox, but I'm actually kind of stunned he hasn't jumped ship to start his own thing yet.
I would think he is under contract. Maybe when the Fox News/Tucker contract expires he will venture out on his own.
Furthermore, Tucker is carrying Fox News' streaming service, Fox Nation. Tucker has single handily made that part of the network successful and is an extremely important part of Fox News going forward as boomers die off. After Gen X, the majority of content will be on demand.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:42 am to wutangfinancial
According to who? He told DW he doesnt even know his sub numbers.
And how many of those subs already sub to DW+ there is a lot of overlap in audiences. So whats DW’s pickup?
If he is certain of that figure, then its really easy to negotiate the contract.
And how many of those subs already sub to DW+ there is a lot of overlap in audiences. So whats DW’s pickup?
If he is certain of that figure, then its really easy to negotiate the contract.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:42 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You said "everyone who doesn’t present the narrative that big tech wants" which you apparently believe includes Crowder.
And includes anyone else who has options that are deemed not tolerable. So back to you
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:42 am to jnethe1
quote:
So essentially demonetization because he doesn’t present the narrative that is deemed allowable.
The cost of doing business today.
Honesty is not a value modern humans appreciate. We all must pretend.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:43 am to wutangfinancial
quote:
He'd be a moron to work for somebody else.
And yet thats all hes done the entire time hes been doing his show. But great contribution to this thread!
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:43 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
If YouTube decides to pay him, sure.
What is the basis for the kids pay who has the YouTube channel with his parents?
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
He can control it. He just doesn't think he should have to.
How can he control it?
Tell me what he (and anyone else like crowder) has to do.
Posted on 1/19/23 at 8:44 am to jnethe1
quote:You are not asking DW to be his employer, you are asking them to be his insurance company, providing a guaranteed revenue stream.
It’s not about the money, it’s about the ability for him to lose revenue based on something he can’t control. We have seen companies banning people for saying there are two genders. Based on that, there is no possible way to say he controls his own situation.
Page 7 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News